Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Not that I'm forgiving the murderous act in any way, shape or form, Malaysian Airlines has to accept a degree of culpability also. Since the war started most international carriers chose to cease flying that path and diverted to new routes around the trouble. Malaysian, Singapore and a few other airlines continued to use it as it is the most economical route. Wonder if they think it was money well saved now?
Quote from: Smokey on July 19, 2014, 09:55:29 AMNot that I'm forgiving the murderous act in any way, shape or form, Malaysian Airlines has to accept a degree of culpability also. Since the war started most international carriers chose to cease flying that path and diverted to new routes around the trouble. Malaysian, Singapore and a few other airlines continued to use it as it is the most economical route. Wonder if they think it was money well saved now? Interesting was talking about exactly the same thing to someone today. QANTAS, Delta & KLM to name 3 major airlines are refusing to fly in that airspace because of what's going on there and despite it being deemed to be "safe" to fly there. It would appear Maylasian Airlines have made a very poor error in judgement by putting $$ ahead of safety
Quote from: tony_montana on July 18, 2014, 08:51:41 PMQuote from: mightytiges on July 18, 2014, 08:05:40 PMThe Russians claiming they had nothing to do with this is a sick joke. Russian separatists with Russian military hardware senselessly shoot down a civilian aircraft killing 300 people. Nah, nothing to do with Russia .I'd be very surprised if Moscow gave any sort of orders of that nature - that's just sick. Don't America arm most nations on earth? In the Balkan war in the 90's nato forces were fighting the serbs and the serbs were armed by the yanks... just saying mt - selling arms is a massive trade for the yanks and russiansI don't believe they had anything to do with it, but handing the rebels the equipment to carry it out is probably their doing.
Quote from: mightytiges on July 18, 2014, 08:05:40 PMThe Russians claiming they had nothing to do with this is a sick joke. Russian separatists with Russian military hardware senselessly shoot down a civilian aircraft killing 300 people. Nah, nothing to do with Russia .I'd be very surprised if Moscow gave any sort of orders of that nature - that's just sick. Don't America arm most nations on earth? In the Balkan war in the 90's nato forces were fighting the serbs and the serbs were armed by the yanks... just saying mt - selling arms is a massive trade for the yanks and russians
The Russians claiming they had nothing to do with this is a sick joke. Russian separatists with Russian military hardware senselessly shoot down a civilian aircraft killing 300 people. Nah, nothing to do with Russia .
Quote from: WilliamPowell on July 19, 2014, 05:55:35 PMQuote from: Smokey on July 19, 2014, 09:55:29 AMNot that I'm forgiving the murderous act in any way, shape or form, Malaysian Airlines has to accept a degree of culpability also. Since the war started most international carriers chose to cease flying that path and diverted to new routes around the trouble. Malaysian, Singapore and a few other airlines continued to use it as it is the most economical route. Wonder if they think it was money well saved now? Interesting was talking about exactly the same thing to someone today. QANTAS, Delta & KLM to name 3 major airlines are refusing to fly in that airspace because of what's going on there and despite it being deemed to be "safe" to fly there. It would appear Maylasian Airlines have made a very poor error in judgement by putting $$ ahead of safetyAfter seeing the images from flightradar on here it makes it hard to understand why they went through instead of around like every other airliner has done.http://m.couriermail.com.au/news/airlines-including-qantas-quit-flying-over-ukraine-airspace-months-ago/story-fniztvng-1226993758257
Does anyone know what happened to the crew of the US naval vessel which in the late 80s shot down an Iranian airliner by mistake.Were there prosecutions in that case?
Quote from: Judge Roughneck on July 18, 2014, 11:31:45 AMQuote from: Angus Hampson on July 18, 2014, 10:37:23 AMQuote from: Mr Magic on July 18, 2014, 10:34:26 AMQuote from: Angus Hampson on July 18, 2014, 08:20:05 AMNa im all the americans stepping up to the plate. Cause that's worked so well in the past.yeah true it was them who knocked down the twin towersnothing wrong with america getting involved buddy wake uphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I QuoteThe Collapse of Building Seven – 9/11By Charlotte Atkinson / July 17, 2014 / 3 Comments The Collapse of Building SevenBuilding seven was a 47 storey tower, which collapsed just seven hours after the twin towers, however this building was not hit by a plane. How exactly did this tower collapse?The investigators of the National Institute of Standard and Technology, located near Washington DC, said fires on several different floors caused the collapse of building seven. This would make it the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse because of a fire. Conspiracy theorists argue that the tower was brought down in a controlled demolition.National Institute of Standard and Technology lead investigator, Dr Shyam Sunder said, “Our working hypothesis now actually suggests that it was Twin Towersnormal building fires that were growing and spreading throughout the multiple floors that have caused the ultimate collapse of the buildings”.However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse of building seven is impossible. Architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth argue that there must have been a controlled demolition. Founder of the group, Richard Gage says it’s an obvious example of a controlled demolition using explosives. “Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11. A sixth grader can look at this building falling at virtually free-fall speed, symmetrically and smoothly, and see that it is not a natural process. Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least resistance. They don’t go straight down through themselves”. Investigators have made four extremely complex computer models worked out to the finest detail to figure out the mystery of the collapse of building seven, as there is no steel to study. They believe the fires burnt long enough to weaken and break the connections that held the steel structure together.The collapse of building seven is said to be caused by uncontrollable fires. What are your views? Comment belo- See more at: http://consettmagazine.com/blog/2014/07/17/the-collapse-of-building-seven-911/#sthash.bvaaxY21.dpuf[/size]Interesting link Judge and its quite obvious that it was a controlled demolition of building 7 based on the very clear evidence in the video.Would like to chat about this in a more appropriate thread as its a bit off topic for this one.
Quote from: Angus Hampson on July 18, 2014, 10:37:23 AMQuote from: Mr Magic on July 18, 2014, 10:34:26 AMQuote from: Angus Hampson on July 18, 2014, 08:20:05 AMNa im all the americans stepping up to the plate. Cause that's worked so well in the past.yeah true it was them who knocked down the twin towersnothing wrong with america getting involved buddy wake uphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I QuoteThe Collapse of Building Seven – 9/11By Charlotte Atkinson / July 17, 2014 / 3 Comments The Collapse of Building SevenBuilding seven was a 47 storey tower, which collapsed just seven hours after the twin towers, however this building was not hit by a plane. How exactly did this tower collapse?The investigators of the National Institute of Standard and Technology, located near Washington DC, said fires on several different floors caused the collapse of building seven. This would make it the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse because of a fire. Conspiracy theorists argue that the tower was brought down in a controlled demolition.National Institute of Standard and Technology lead investigator, Dr Shyam Sunder said, “Our working hypothesis now actually suggests that it was Twin Towersnormal building fires that were growing and spreading throughout the multiple floors that have caused the ultimate collapse of the buildings”.However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse of building seven is impossible. Architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth argue that there must have been a controlled demolition. Founder of the group, Richard Gage says it’s an obvious example of a controlled demolition using explosives. “Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11. A sixth grader can look at this building falling at virtually free-fall speed, symmetrically and smoothly, and see that it is not a natural process. Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least resistance. They don’t go straight down through themselves”. Investigators have made four extremely complex computer models worked out to the finest detail to figure out the mystery of the collapse of building seven, as there is no steel to study. They believe the fires burnt long enough to weaken and break the connections that held the steel structure together.The collapse of building seven is said to be caused by uncontrollable fires. What are your views? Comment belo- See more at: http://consettmagazine.com/blog/2014/07/17/the-collapse-of-building-seven-911/#sthash.bvaaxY21.dpuf[/size]
Quote from: Mr Magic on July 18, 2014, 10:34:26 AMQuote from: Angus Hampson on July 18, 2014, 08:20:05 AMNa im all the americans stepping up to the plate. Cause that's worked so well in the past.yeah true it was them who knocked down the twin towersnothing wrong with america getting involved buddy wake up
Quote from: Angus Hampson on July 18, 2014, 08:20:05 AMNa im all the americans stepping up to the plate. Cause that's worked so well in the past.
Na im all the americans stepping up to the plate.
The Collapse of Building Seven – 9/11By Charlotte Atkinson / July 17, 2014 / 3 Comments The Collapse of Building SevenBuilding seven was a 47 storey tower, which collapsed just seven hours after the twin towers, however this building was not hit by a plane. How exactly did this tower collapse?The investigators of the National Institute of Standard and Technology, located near Washington DC, said fires on several different floors caused the collapse of building seven. This would make it the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse because of a fire. Conspiracy theorists argue that the tower was brought down in a controlled demolition.National Institute of Standard and Technology lead investigator, Dr Shyam Sunder said, “Our working hypothesis now actually suggests that it was Twin Towersnormal building fires that were growing and spreading throughout the multiple floors that have caused the ultimate collapse of the buildings”.However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse of building seven is impossible. Architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth argue that there must have been a controlled demolition. Founder of the group, Richard Gage says it’s an obvious example of a controlled demolition using explosives. “Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11. A sixth grader can look at this building falling at virtually free-fall speed, symmetrically and smoothly, and see that it is not a natural process. Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least resistance. They don’t go straight down through themselves”. Investigators have made four extremely complex computer models worked out to the finest detail to figure out the mystery of the collapse of building seven, as there is no steel to study. They believe the fires burnt long enough to weaken and break the connections that held the steel structure together.The collapse of building seven is said to be caused by uncontrollable fires. What are your views? Comment belo- See more at: http://consettmagazine.com/blog/2014/07/17/the-collapse-of-building-seven-911/#sthash.bvaaxY21.dpuf
Quote from: Gigantor on July 20, 2014, 10:50:25 AMDoes anyone know what happened to the crew of the US naval vessel which in the late 80s shot down an Iranian airliner by mistake.Were there prosecutions in that case?The USA government 'awarded' medals for tour of duty... to the soldiers that shot down a civilian plane killing 66 children , 290 people. My understanding is they were not prosecuted as it was apparently an accident...https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655
