This why we should at least be trading back into the draft. Would love to get one of Garlett, Langford or Goddard with a second Top 20 pick.
that would be too logical. we are embracing the nd this yr or so ive been told but as far as i can tell not one attempt to trade into better picks.
have said a few times a draft of something like 12 laverde mid/utility, 15 marchbank kpd, 25 lamb tall fwd and 31 kietel kpf , 47 mid. would be great.
seems we are neither interested in getting players or getting picks. they must be over the moon with the current list.
Was thinking the same thing.....
let me rephrase it.
a draft of something like 12 laverde, 15 marchbank, 25 lamb, 31 kietel and 47 mid, would HAVE been great. a part reason for posting here is to complain about the way we have gone about it. no chance of trading players out when we resign them all before the trade period has even begun. ive complained for awhile now this very thing.
clearly those in charge think we are very close im wondering when people will start to hold em to their actions.
clearly to improve enough and break even with most other clubs we will need to find a miles type or two with rookie picks good luck with that, and we will need to nail all 3 or 4 of our nd picks which with fjs record id say is near on impossible. he may get 12 right but his record with picks like 31, 47, and 66 which is our lot atm is grim.
so no trades no f/as poor nd record, poor rookie list record leaves exactly what.
Who do you want to trade out that you reckon will actually get us pick 15? I can't promise everyone else won't rip into you, but I won't
Edited to correct quote
