That Pelchin article was truly rubbish.
He rated us the lowest yet look at adelaide Collingwood essendon fremantle. Joke. Pies lost two match winners yet rated that high. Beams and Harry O are in their top 10, yet that rated higher than us..Joke.
not sure what is not to like what collingwood did.
they lost obrien basically for varcoe in a three club player swap.., they basically managed to snare crisp who looks real promising, nd 5 degoey and nd 25 greenwood, to replace beams. while not in the same class as beams greenwood is a handy inside mature replacement especially if his form continues. degoey though could be a beauty and every bit as good as beams..
degoey for beams, i rated heeney, petracca , degoey then brayshaw in that order as far as mids go. add moore f/s at 9 and bloody hell theres some real potential gone to that club. to top it off they took maynard with a second rounder.
imo they had a very good trade /draft period with the hand they were dealt.
to me they covered their senior losses as best as they could and once again well and truly looked after the long term future.
what is scary is the thought of both scharenberg and freeman coming into their team both very high picks last yr and both injured last yr. basically high quaity new recruits.
yes beams is a big loss but harry o they couldnt get out the door quick enough there had been too many issues. ball retired but his best was way behind him.
i think pelchens ratings swayed by both trades and nd. not surprising richmond and freo rated worse than anyone else because of the lack of trades.
personally if im sceptical about any clubs trade / draft period its geelongs. to me in trades both of stanley and clarke are high risk. as is blease as a f/a. ditto for me with nakia cockatoo at nd pick 10.