Trade/FA rumours

[WA Tiger]

yeah, WATs got a few 20 cm puffer fish in there, for sure.

yeah its a subjective thing but anyone we dont get isnt much of a criteria

So out of that 8 are you kidding me that if we landed one of them they wouldn't be a big fish at our club???

[Penelope]

Your second list?

but still no

to me only dangerfield and treloar

Out of curiosity, who on our list would you regard as a big fish?

[(•))(©™]

Yarran is an eel not a fish.

[Dougeytherichmondfan]

Yarran is an eel not a fish.

He was a big fish a few years ago....

[WA Tiger]

Your second list?

but still no

to me only dangerfield and treloar

Out of curiosity, who on our list would you regard as a big fish?

Well, I see more on that list. Ours; Martin, Jack, Rance, Deledio and at a stretch Cotchin.

[Penelope]

yeah, thats pretty much agreeable.

so how many in your list do you put in the same class as these?

[Diocletian]

"Big Fish" or not... I'd just like a player or two of genuine, proven quality who'll genuinely improve the list, - Redden will, Tomlinson, Henderson or Carlisle will as would have Bennell, Luenberger and even Suckling...not just bargain basement fringe types who'll only be minor upgrades at best and invariably still have deficiencies... 

[WA Tiger]

yeah, thats pretty much agreeable.

so how many in your list do you put in the same class as these?

Bennell, Dangerfield, Treloar, McCarthy, Dixon, Henderson and Sellwood. So we had a crack at one of them, if you look at Aish and Redden as well, if they go then there is a fair bit around.

[WA Tiger]

yeah, thats pretty much agreeable.

so how many in your list do you put in the same class as these?

So out of my list, how do you compare Conca, Grigg, Bachelor, Hampson, B Ellis and Griff to them? Because I would have any of my list over this lot!!

[Penelope]

bennel could be, dixon may be, not convinced about the others. Hendeson does go close and i would be happy to get him.

"Big Fish" or not... I'd just like a player or two of genuine, proven quality who'll genuinely improve the list, - Redden will, Tomlinson, Henderson or Carlisle will as would have Bennell, Luenberger and even Suckling...not just bargain basement fringe types who'll only be minor upgrades at best and invariably still have deficiencies... 

hard to argue against the sentiment, although i reckon the last three fall under the deficiency statement, for various reasons. Our poor ruck stocks do make leuninburger seem more appealing than he actually is, IMO

[Stalin]

Dangerfield
Bennell
Trelor
Dixon
Carilse
Tomlinson
McCarthy
Lbueger

Pretty much any former very high expansion club picks

Ruck man

Assorted key defenders

[Stalin]

Your second list?

but still no

to me only dangerfield and treloar

Out of curiosity, who on our list would you regard as a big fish?

Given , how old and Shyte troy Chappy is

And given how young , and what ability Carlisle has already show in earlier seasons

[with have to include this line for al ;  and given Chaplin would in theory be replaced by the said new acquisition, this is how it's related ]

For Richmond - that would be a big fish

Given list presently, with long term success in mind

IMO

[Penelope]

ah ok, not only does trot chaplin make hacks good players, he makes minnows big fish.

he really is an amazing person............

[Stalin]

Is jake needles a "hack" ?

Would

grimes jake needles rance deledio c Ellis vlastuin houli

Be superior to te current model?

[YellowandBlackBlood]

Andrew Moore anyone?