Author Topic: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?  (Read 6369 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« on: November 19, 2015, 09:58:42 PM »
Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list? We crunch the numbers

AFL.com.au
19 November 2015


MEMO Adam Treloar: there's little separating Richmond and Collingwood on paper.

Their primary lists ahead of next week's NAB AFL Draft show little separates them when it comes to age.

The Tigers are the ninth oldest team in the competition with an average age of 24.58, while the Magpies are 14th with 24.29.

They're even closer when it comes to average games played – the Tigers are seventh with an average of 78.7 and the Pies ninth with 78.4.

The Tigers have 12 players who were taken in the top 15 of their draft years, and the Pies 10.

They both made plays at the trade table this year that may dictate their progress in coming seasons.

The Tigers filled needs – they added inside midfielder Jacob Townsend (aged 22) from Greater Western Sydney and line-breaking half-back Chris Yarran (24) from Carlton.

After the retirements of Nathan Foley and Daniel Jackson the year before, they bolstered their inside depth by adding Port Adelaide midfielder Andrew Moore (24) as a delisted free agent.

The Pies picked up three and lost three – James Aish (20), Jeremy Howe (25) and Treloar (22) came in for Nathan Freeman (20), Ben Kennedy (21) and Paul Seedsman (23).

Finals appearances in the past two seasons suggest the Tigers are in a better position at the moment.

They have seven players who finished inside the top 100 of this year's Official Player Ratings, compared to the Pies' three – although Scott Pendlebury did rank second overall at the season's end.

But which team will be in a better position when Treloar enters his prime in three to four years?

At nearly 30, ruckman Ivan Maric is Richmond's oldest player. By comparison, the Pies' big men, Jarrod Witts and Brodie Grundy, are 23 and 21.

Richmond also relies on its second-oldest player Troy Chaplin (29) to help marshal the backline, while Brett Deledio is 28 – and it's well known the Tigers struggle when he's not playing well.

The Pies will grow less reliant on their oldest player Dane Swan (31) as Jack Crisp and Taylor Adams (both 22), who finished third and fourth in the best and fairest, continue to emerge.

Travis Cloke (28) and Jack Riewoldt (27) are close in age but there is a gap in experience with 233 games to 180.

The Magpies have Darcy Moore (19) already entrenched in his apprenticeship to be the next forward star, while the Tigers have Liam McBean, a proven VFL goalkicker, who has played two games in three seasons.

Can the Tigers take a big enough forward step while their premiership window is open in the next few years, or will the Magpies' decision to trade away this and next year's first-round draft picks for Treloar pay off?

One thing is certain – the rivalry between Collingwood and Richmond has been given a boost ahead of their round two clash on April 1 next season, with the Magpies firing the opening shot.

AFL.com.au's best 22s for 2016 (AFL Player Ratings in brackets - the lower score is better).

B: Nick Vlastuin (205), Alex Rance (30), Dylan Grimes (359)
B: Marley Williams (130), Nathan Brown (427), Alan Toovey (296)

HB: Chris Yarran (109), Troy Chaplin (161), Bachar Houli (179)
HB: Travis Varcoe (181), Ben Reid (522), Tom Langdon (150)

C: Brandon Ellis (196), Anthony Miles (117), Kamdyn McIntosh (437)
C: Steele Sidebottom (41), Adam Treloar (27), Jack Crisp (170)

HF: Dustin Martin (49), Ty Vickery (300), Shane Edwards (43)
HF: Jeremy Howe (149), Darcy Moore (530), Dane Swan (75)

F: Ben Griffiths (379), Jack Riewoldt (46), Kane Lambert (489)
F: Jamie Elliott (113), Travis Cloke (225), Alex Fasolo (275)

Foll: Ivan Maric (54), Trent Cotchin (73), Brett Deledio (23)

Foll: Brodie Grundy (256), Scott Pendlebury (2), Taylor Adams (223)

I/C: Shaun Grigg (194), Reece Conca (363), Taylor Hunt (377), Ben Lennon (524)

I/C: James Aish (297), Levi Greenwood (206), Jordan De Goey (484), Matt Scharenberg (672)

Richmond overall Player Ratings: 4707. Average: 214

Collingwood overall Player Ratings: 5451. Average: 248

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-11-19/collingwood-v-richmond-who-has-the-better-list-we-crunch-the-numbers

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2015, 01:30:27 AM »
Adam Treloar says Collingwood’s list is better than Richmond’s — is he right?

Al Paton
Herald Sun
November 20, 2015


RATING THE LISTS

Treloar might wish he had seen an early draft of the Champion Data 2016 Prospectus before his Falls Creek press conference.

The AFL stats gurus provide a complete rating of every club’s list, and they have given a sneak peak on the Magpies and Tigers.

Collingwood has two players rated elite for their position — Scott Pendlebury and Dane Swan.

The Tigers have five — Alex Rance, Dustin Martin, Brett Deledio, Jack Riewoldt and Bachar Houli.

There were seven “above average” Magpies at the start of last season — Dane Swan, Travis Varcoe, Steele Sidebottom, Jarryd Blair, Jamie Elliott, Paul Seedsman and Marley Williams. Based on 2015 form Swan returns to the elite bracket for 2016 while Varcoe, Sidebottom, Williams and Elliott should hold their spots. Paul Seedsman was traded to Adelaide and Jarryd Blair is touch and go.

Taylor Adams is a certainty to jump into the “above average” category along with former Lion Jack Crisp.

Treloar will also be there and ex-Demon Jeremy Howe might too (he was rated above average 12 months ago), but the jury is out on James Aish, who was rated below average last year but with the potential of a No.7 draft pick.

And the Pies have No.5 pick Jordan de Goey, pick 6 Matt Scharenberg and father-son gun Darcy Moore, who should all be pushing towards elite in the next 2-3 years, plus a 10-year ruckman in Brodie Grundy.

The downside is the loss of No.10 pick Nathan Freeman to St Kilda and No.19 pick Ben Kennedy to Melbourne — and the age of Swan (32 next February) and Travis Cloke (29 in March), who could both be gone when the likes of Treloar, Adams and De Goey reach their prime. Cloke’s powers have faded but replacing him will be top of the list management agenda — the Pies’ leading goalkickers this year were Jamie Elliott (35), Cloke (34) and Alex Fasolo (17) which isn’t a recipe for premiership success.

At Richmond, meanwhile, Martin and Houli jumped into the elite category while Shane Edwards has slipped back to above average.

Nick Vlastuin and Troy Chaplin did enough to stay in the above average category along with Ivan Maric and Trent Cotchin, although the captain’s elimination final performance will haunt him for a while.

Chris Yarran was rated elite at the start of the year but is set for a tumble, although the Tigers will be hoping he plays more like the 2014 Yarran than the 2015 version at Punt Rd.

There aren’t many players dropping from the top bracket, but there aren’t a lot pushing up from below either, with Brandon Ellis (rated average last year) the clear standout. The Tigers need the likes of Reece Conca (average), Ty Vickery (average) plus first-round draft picks Ben Lennon and Corey Ellis to make the jump.


BUCKY’S TAKE

Former Hawthorn recruiter Gary Buckenara put every club’s list under the microscope after the 2015 season. Here’s a quick version of what he said about the Magpies and Tigers.

COLLINGWOOD

Nathan Buckley has a number of quality young players on his list and the sky is the limit for the group next season — finals are a non-negotiable and even challenging for a premiership isn’t out of the question.

It was inexperience that cost them this season, while bad luck with injuries also played a role but as a club internally, they’d still be disappointed.

For mine, the Pies have been disappointing the last couple of years even though they have been in a bit of a development/rejig mode. It’s time for them to start delivering.

I see them being a contender next year — as I said earlier as a minimum should play finals in 2016 — but if not next year in terms of challenging then definitely in 2-3 years the Pies should be knocking on the door of winning a premiership.


Richmond fans can expect to see a lot more of youngster Corey Ellis next season. Picture: Colleen Petch

RICHMOND


The time is now, Richmond. Your premiership window is open.

The fact is this list as it stands, with the addition of Chris Yarran during the trade period, can beat anyone on its day. They are a very dangerous side with a good spread of talent across all lines. It’s consistency and lack of confidence that holds the group back.

What I have learnt by analysing Richmond’s list at the conclusion of 2015 and heading into next year is that the Tigers are definitely in the window and must win a premiership in the next two to three years or they risk missing out and sliding back down the ladder … again.

September action is a non-negotiable for the next three years.


THE VERDICT

Treloar is wrong if he’s talking about right now — the Tigers’ list is well stocked with high-grade talent and ready to challenge for a flag. That’s hardly surprising looking at what happened this year when Richmond won 15 games to Collingwood’s 10, including a 91-point thumping of the Pies in Round 21. Richmond’s main problem is turning that into results in September.

But if Treloar is looking a couple of years into the future, he might have a point.

While Richmond’s core of Cotchin (25), Riewoldt (27) and Martin (24) are all in their prime, there are some concerns at the top end in the form of 29-year-olds Troy Chaplin and Ivan Maric, while Brett Deledio is 28.

The bigger worry is making an impact while the window is open — something the Tigers have conspicuously failed to do in the past three seasons — before being overtaken by the juggernauts of GWS and Gold Coast. And possibly Collingwood.

Sidebottom, Adams, Moore, de Goey, Crisp and Grundy — plus Treloar and Aish — form a group ready to bust open the flag window. And while Swan and Cloke might be in the twilight of their careers, superstar Pendlebury is still only 27 and has just signed a four-year contract.

Interestingly given the state of each club’s list, Collingwood traded away pick 7 in this year’s draft and their first-round pick next year in the Treloar deal — so they are banking on the current squad delivering. While Richmond has pick 12, the Pies don’t get a look in until pick 27 this year and the story will be similar next year.

The first test for Treloar’s theory will be in Round 2 next year when Collingwood and Richmond face off on a Friday night at the MCG.

That game suddenly has a lot more spice, and is it a coincidence it’s on April 1?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/adam-treloar-says-collingwoods-list-is-better-than-richmonds--is-he-right/news-story/0b467356796092a9c327ac2cd040fbc6

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2804
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2015, 11:25:28 AM »
I think we're entering similar territory as Hawthorn when they were contenders (and ultimately winning) in 2008

In that GF, they had a 24 year old Brad Sewell who was a jet, a 24 year old Luke Hodge, a 26 year old Sam Mitchell, a 21 year old Lance Franklin who kicked 113 goals that year and a 21 year old Lewis with a 34 year old Shane Crawford to provide a bit of experience and flair.

During the 2016 season our A graders are in a higher age bracket with Cotchin (26 in Apr) Martin (24 Jun) Miles (23 in Feb) Rance (26 for whole season) Riewoldt (27) Deledio (29 in Apr).

This isn't too dissimilar to the 08 Hawthorn team. So the questions for me are, does that make Yarran our Stuart Dew? If we don't win a premiereship with Lids on the team, is that the end of the premiership window because from a psychological sense, the more you stumble at the same hurdle the harder it gets to over come (St. Kilda between 09-11)

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2015, 11:40:51 AM »
I think we're entering similar territory as Hawthorn when they were contenders (and ultimately winning) in 2008

In that GF, they had a 24 year old Brad Sewell who was a jet, a 24 year old Luke Hodge, a 26 year old Sam Mitchell, a 21 year old Lance Franklin who kicked 113 goals that year and a 21 year old Lewis with a 34 year old Shane Crawford to provide a bit of experience and flair.

During the 2016 season our A graders are in a higher age bracket with Cotchin (26 in Apr) Martin (24 Jun) Miles (23 in Feb) Rance (26 for whole season) Riewoldt (27) Deledio (29 in Apr).

This isn't too dissimilar to the 08 Hawthorn team. So the questions for me are, does that make Yarran our Stuart Dew? If we don't win a premiereship with Lids on the team, is that the end of the premiership window because from a psychological sense, the more you stumble at the same hurdle the harder it gets to over come (St. Kilda between 09-11)
Just need a 21 year old Lance Franklin and we're set! ;D
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7576
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2015, 07:57:12 PM »
McBean  :shh
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2015, 08:38:11 PM »
McBean  :shh
I wish. Somehow I think he isn't quite the same player.....
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2015, 08:47:49 PM »
I think they have done a great job over the last 3 or 4 years to stockpile young talent while offloading some of their more experienced players for one reason or another, that had taken them as far as they could.
They have been brave in doing this and Buckley has taken a hit over it. It shows me he is willing to make tough decisions that aren't always going to be popular ones. Could we say the same about Hardwick?
But it's one thing to draft potentially good kids but it's another for them to become good/great players. It's a risk they took and IMO it will pay off.

Is their list better than ours?
Not at the moment obviously as we have played finals the last 3 years and they haven't but things can change pretty quickly and we had better start getting more brave with our trading or we could get overtaken really quickly.
We also need to start playing our young talent and moving on the Grigg's, Houli's, Hunt's and Chaplin's of the club. They have taken us as far as they are going to.

It's not to say I don't hate them though but Essendon clearly have my most hated club at the minute with North a close second.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2015, 09:03:03 PM »
If Treloar and Aish came to Richmond, we clearly would have had the better list. That's the strange thing about the comments from Treloar. He and Aish weren't there when he was making his decision.....
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2015, 09:23:27 PM »
I think we're entering similar territory as Hawthorn when they were contenders (and ultimately winning) in 2008

In that GF, they had a 24 year old Brad Sewell who was a jet, a 24 year old Luke Hodge, a 26 year old Sam Mitchell, a 21 year old Lance Franklin who kicked 113 goals that year and a 21 year old Lewis with a 34 year old Shane Crawford to provide a bit of experience and flair.

During the 2016 season our A graders are in a higher age bracket with Cotchin (26 in Apr) Martin (24 Jun) Miles (23 in Feb) Rance (26 for whole season) Riewoldt (27) Deledio (29 in Apr).

This isn't too dissimilar to the 08 Hawthorn team. So the questions for me are, does that make Yarran our Stuart Dew? If we don't win a premiereship with Lids on the team, is that the end of the premiership window because from a psychological sense, the more you stumble at the same hurdle the harder it gets to over come (St. Kilda between 09-11)
Just need a 21 year old Lance Franklin and we're set! ;D

darcy moore ?
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2015, 09:24:02 PM »
I think they have done a great job over the last 3 or 4 years to stockpile young talent while offloading some of their more experienced players for one reason or another, that had taken them as far as they could.
They have been brave in doing this and Buckley has taken a hit over it. It shows me he is willing to make tough decisions that aren't always going to be popular ones. Could we say the same about Hardwick?
But it's one thing to draft potentially good kids but it's another for them to become good/great players. It's a risk they took and IMO it will pay off.

Is their list better than ours?
Not at the moment obviously as we have played finals the last 3 years and they haven't but things can change pretty quickly and we had better start getting more brave with our trading or we could get overtaken really quickly.
We also need to start playing our young talent and moving on the Grigg's, Houli's, Hunt's and Chaplin's of the club. They have taken us as far as they are going to.

It's not to say I don't hate them though but Essendon clearly have my most hated club at the minute with North a close second.

well said mate  :clapping
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17863
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2015, 09:27:10 PM »


Just need a 21 year old Lance Franklin and we're set! ;D

darcy moore ?

Spencer White for the rookie list. :shh
"Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire." 

- Gustav Mahler


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2015, 09:28:00 PM »
I think they have done a great job over the last 3 or 4 years to stockpile young talent while offloading some of their more experienced players for one reason or another, that had taken them as far as they could.
They have been brave in doing this and Buckley has taken a hit over it. It shows me he is willing to make tough decisions that aren't always going to be popular ones. Could we say the same about Hardwick?
But it's one thing to draft potentially good kids but it's another for them to become good/great players. It's a risk they took and IMO it will pay off.

Is their list better than ours?
Not at the moment obviously as we have played finals the last 3 years and they haven't but things can change pretty quickly and we had better start getting more brave with our trading or we could get overtaken really quickly.
We also need to start playing our young talent and moving on the Grigg's, Houli's, Hunt's and Chaplin's of the club. They have taken us as far as they are going to.

It's not to say I don't hate them though but Essendon clearly have my most hated club at the minute with North a close second.

well said mate  :clapping
Let me guess, your favourite bit was moving on Grigg and Chaplin. Am I right? :snidegrin
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2015, 09:29:30 PM »
I think they have done a great job over the last 3 or 4 years to stockpile young talent while offloading some of their more experienced players for one reason or another, that had taken them as far as they could.
They have been brave in doing this and Buckley has taken a hit over it. It shows me he is willing to make tough decisions that aren't always going to be popular ones. Could we say the same about Hardwick?
But it's one thing to draft potentially good kids but it's another for them to become good/great players. It's a risk they took and IMO it will pay off.

Is their list better than ours?
Not at the moment obviously as we have played finals the last 3 years and they haven't but things can change pretty quickly and we had better start getting more brave with our trading or we could get overtaken really quickly.
We also need to start playing our young talent and moving on the Grigg's, Houli's, Hunt's and Chaplin's of the club. They have taken us as far as they are going to.

It's not to say I don't hate them though but Essendon clearly have my most hated club at the minute with North a close second.

well said mate  :clapping
Let me guess, your favourite bit was moving on Grigg and Chaplin. Am I right? :snidegrin

Collingwood list management under Buckley has been excellent for mine - laugh it up chuckles

i didnt even read the 2nd paragraph. was nodding my head during the first. upon further inspection a truly grand post

BT for president  :clapping
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2015, 10:10:23 PM »
If Treloar and Aish came to Richmond, we clearly would have had the better list. That's the strange thing about the comments from Treloar. He and Aish weren't there when he was making his decision.....
I'm not really fused about Aish. I haven't really seen much to tell me he will be anymore than "just" a player. No real weapons IMO.
And I know this will get some reaction but I think Treloar is a good player but not great. And I don't think he will ever get to that. Just my opinion.

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2804
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2015, 12:26:57 AM »
If Treloar and Aish came to Richmond, we clearly would have had the better list. That's the strange thing about the comments from Treloar. He and Aish weren't there when he was making his decision.....
I'm not really fused about Aish. I haven't really seen much to tell me he will be anymore than "just" a player. No real weapons IMO.
And I know this will get some reaction but I think Treloar is a good player but not great. And I don't think he will ever get to that. Just my opinion.

I see where you're coming from there but I think the danger lies in what happens to a 'good but not great' player in Treloar when he is also in the company of Taylor Adams, Pendlebury, sidebottom, swan? The environment could make him an absolute beast.