Author Topic: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo  (Read 22756 times)

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #90 on: February 19, 2016, 08:15:25 PM »
Jeez that Ellis is soft
B Ellis. = Butter Ellis
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58589
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #91 on: February 19, 2016, 08:18:14 PM »
Possies:

Conca    14
B.Ellis     13
McIntosh 12
Grigg      12
C.Ellis     10
Marcon    9
Chappy   9
Menadue 9
Broad      8
Lennon   7
Lambert 7
Morris    7
Griffs     6
Townsend 5
Lloyd      5
Astbury  5
Floss      4
Batch    4
Chol      3
Vickery   2 .... (off concussed)
Short     2
Rioli      1
Soldo   1


Disposals:  155 - 192  (cont. 61 - 60; stoppages 12 - 9 )
Clearances:  16 - 16  (cent. 4 - 7 )
Inside 50s:   21 - 22  (marks  2 - 6)
Tackles:       37 - 36
Hitouts:         9 - 32
Frees:           9 - 7

http://www.afl.com.au/match-centre/nab-challenge/2016/1/fre-v-rich
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #92 on: February 19, 2016, 08:19:04 PM »
Conca? Surely not?!  :laugh: ;)

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40082
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #93 on: February 19, 2016, 08:20:34 PM »
Conca? Surely not?!  :laugh: ;)

Hes been OK but would love to know the efficiency %. He's butchered a few but most of them have
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #94 on: February 19, 2016, 08:21:25 PM »
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19138
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #95 on: February 19, 2016, 08:21:58 PM »
Conca's been arse - should leave him in WA.....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #96 on: February 19, 2016, 08:24:17 PM »
Conca has been cheap ball city. 

Some big howlers too
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Petey

  • Bad
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
  • SgtAA of OER
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #97 on: February 19, 2016, 08:24:55 PM »
Conca has been ass

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #98 on: February 19, 2016, 08:28:10 PM »
Conca's been arse - should leave him in WA.....

Trade for a whopper with cheese and divide between 70,000 members.  Would be a good deal
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #99 on: February 19, 2016, 08:30:37 PM »
35 years of this poo

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58589
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #100 on: February 19, 2016, 08:31:26 PM »
Aaron Sandilands has helped Fremantle to an advantage of 32 to nine in the hit-outs, winning 18 hit-outs to one against Ben Griffiths. The Dockers have outscored Richmond 4.0.24 to 3.1.19 from stoppages, despite the Tigers leading clearances 17 to 16.

At the half, Fremantle has used the ball better in the blustery conditions, kicking at an efficiency of 67 per cent compared to Richmond's 58 per cent. Forward of centre the Dockers have gone at 62 per cent by foot, compared to the Tigers' 52 per cent.

http://www.afl.com.au/match-centre/nab-challenge/2016/1/fre-v-rich
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58589
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #101 on: February 19, 2016, 08:34:25 PM »
Marks inside 50 and set shots have been the main difference tonight. We've had to scramble goals at ground level without Jack and TV off the ground.

22 - 56
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58589
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #102 on: February 19, 2016, 08:35:53 PM »
We work it around the 50 and Broad finds Chol 25m out on the boundary. However, the kick is OOTF.

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #103 on: February 19, 2016, 08:37:17 PM »
Markov hmmmmm
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: NAB 1: Richmond vs Freo
« Reply #104 on: February 19, 2016, 08:39:44 PM »
Astbury playing waaaaay off his man for the second lead in a row
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018