Author Topic: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks / We get pick 26 as compo [update]  (Read 65960 times)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #150 on: October 07, 2016, 05:33:46 PM »
Above average in so much he has kicked more goals than almost everyone around his age bracket

All forwards get "fed" the ball especially full forwards

Watts kicked more goals than him this year :lol

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #151 on: October 07, 2016, 05:35:19 PM »
Above average in so much he has kicked more goals than almost everyone around his age bracket

All forwards get "fed" the ball especially full forwards

Watts kicked more goals than him this year :lol

The same Watts that went 7 picks higher than him?

Online Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19577
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #152 on: October 07, 2016, 05:36:00 PM »
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Online Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19577
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #153 on: October 07, 2016, 05:38:05 PM »
Above average in so much he has kicked more goals than almost everyone around his age bracket

All forwards get "fed" the ball especially full forwards

Watts kicked more goals than him this year :lol

The same Watts that went 7 picks higher than him?

Well, that makes it all ok then.....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #154 on: October 07, 2016, 05:51:01 PM »
Above average in so much he has kicked more goals than almost everyone around his age bracket

All forwards get "fed" the ball especially full forwards

Watts kicked more goals than him this year :lol

The same Watts that went 7 picks higher than him?

The same Watts that no one has rated for 8 years. I guess in turn we shouldn't care how many more people Vickery kicked goals than because chances are, he went higher than them so it doesn't count

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14098
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #155 on: October 07, 2016, 05:54:44 PM »
Eff him off lads. Be clinical and ruthless

Not disputing that at all but given its a 2 year contract it's more likely to be late 30's. Ruthless IMO would be say FU we are matching and let's deal with north

Be honest what are the chances any club let alone us has of landing someone descent with a late 30 pick

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #156 on: October 07, 2016, 06:01:15 PM »
Above average in so much he has kicked more goals than almost everyone around his age bracket

All forwards get "fed" the ball especially full forwards

Watts kicked more goals than him this year :lol

The same Watts that went 7 picks higher than him?

The same Watts that no one has rated for 8 years. I guess in turn we shouldn't care how many more people Vickery kicked goals than because chances are, he went higher than them so it doesn't count

Oh man! That really does take the stuffing cake. How are the Watts apologists (and they're bloody everywhere) that suddenly justify his pick coz he's played one "decent" season? What's the measure of a decent season you ask? Kicking more goals than Vickery in his worst season since 2010 when Richmond went 8-14 of course. God love you blokes!

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #157 on: October 07, 2016, 06:05:52 PM »
Above average in so much he has kicked more goals than almost everyone around his age bracket

All forwards get "fed" the ball especially full forwards

Watts kicked more goals than him this year :lol



The same Watts that went 7 picks higher than him?

 :shh

Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40617
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #158 on: October 07, 2016, 06:26:08 PM »
Other thing to consider is if we match and then try and trade and we can't then we are stuck with him for 2 more years

Pretty sure, most on here want him goneski   :whistle
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14098
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #159 on: October 07, 2016, 06:32:30 PM »
I want dimwit and that piggy sue gone first, but putting that aside.

Vickery has to bypass trade week, ND and PSD before he stays with us

This correct willy? If so its not gonna happen so let's match and start growing some balls for once
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40617
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #160 on: October 07, 2016, 06:37:10 PM »
I want dimwit and that piggy sue gone first, but putting that aside.

Vickery has to bypass trade week, ND and PSD before he stays with us

This correct willy? If so its not gonna happen so let's match and start growing some balls for once
If we dont do a trade

Then he stays

He is a restricted FA, means if we match only way he goes is via trade.

No trade he stays. Under FA rules we match we are required to keep on the same terms in the Hawks offer

That's my understanding

Ch7 news are saying he will speaking to them in tonight's news
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #161 on: October 07, 2016, 06:42:39 PM »
Bet he doesn't go anywhere  :damnpc
Caracella and Balmey.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #162 on: October 07, 2016, 06:45:58 PM »
Hawks only want him because he is free. To get anything better than 25-30 they would have to give us their first pick.   :rollin


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98796
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #163 on: October 07, 2016, 06:56:03 PM »
Vickery interviewed on Ch 7 news:

* Mark Stevens said it's not quite a done deal. Tigers have until Monday to match the deal. Richmond waiting for what compensation they receive from the AFL.

* Ty said he was "excited at the opportunity for a fresh start". He said he needed fresh start at a "positive environment" like Hawthorn where he could "achieve his best football".

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14098
Re: Vickery agrees to terms with Hawks [update]
« Reply #164 on: October 07, 2016, 06:57:10 PM »
Not sure William. Think if we can't trade he can nominate for the draft and put a price on his head?

Dwaino this is a business and Hawks want him and it seems need him, so they will give us what we want.

This assumes they match which they should if it's a Waite type of scenario.

Scenario is simple. Don't match and accept 26 etc or tell them all to Get F and try grab a better pick than 40. Their second pick is around 33.




Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.