Again, I'm totally confused by your angle. Why did you decide to compare Watts to Vickery? Watts was chosen ahead of Vickery and so should be performing better. Or is your point that Watts was a dud #1 pick?
If so you'd be a hypocrite if you potted any draft choices Richmond made who were outperformed by subsequent draft picks. (et. al Tambing/Franklin, Conca/Caddy, Heppell, Prestia)
So again, why Watts?
There's no angle, no spin, no agenda and I don't understand why you don't get it. I've dumbed it down for you as much as I can but I'll try one more time. Someone said he's kicked more goals than most in his draft year (which is true) and it reminded me Watts kicked more than him this year. I find that funny. Simple.
If you're still struggling to understand, stop reading because the following will probably confuse you as it's moving onto a different point.
I find it ironic that you use "earlier draft pick" as an excuse though. First you ramble on implying Watts is a dud who cares what he did this year it doesn't justify his draft position but then turn around and say he should be performing better because he was pick 1. Do we not hope pick 6 this year is the best of the lot (if we keep it) or do we hope it's the 6th best because eh, we took them behind five other blokes.
