Author Topic: Jack Graham that is [merged]  (Read 164942 times)

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #765 on: October 01, 2022, 01:00:33 PM »
Will rotate off the bench , our best tagger and covers injuries, happy days

Broadsword

  • Guest
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #766 on: October 01, 2022, 01:04:00 PM »
He's also a Boston Bruin--my team--so this is doubly good news.  :cheers

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3861
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #767 on: October 01, 2022, 01:16:25 PM »
Good that he stayed was never going to be a disaster if he left.

In some ways if he decided to go it would have been good for us in the sense that we will be offering up plenty of picks for Taranto and Hopper and this may well have been a good way to get back into the draft with a decent pick.

Have always been concerned when we don't utilise decent picks in the draft each year. This draft has been touted as a very good one.

The other question of where does he play and in front of who in whatever role remains.

He is not in front of Taranto, Hopper, Prestia Martin, Bolton  Cotchin and Sonsie imo.

Imo he is just too slow to play an outside role and should not get a hb flank or wing role in front of Pickett, McIntosh, Ralphsmith and the other two kids in Brown and Banks.

He should not imo get a game in front of M Rioli and Cumberland as small fwds and on top of that with the midfield depth he is in a contest with Martin and Bolton as well who will definately spend a lot of time forward.

Does he play from the bench? debateable.
Imo Miller or Soldo will play preferably Miller who offers far better flexability and genuine cover if a tall goes down in a game. He  is tracking in the right direction and really should be played as part of long term view

That leaves Cotchin Sonsie, Baker all mids to round out the bench..Thats who i envision he will be in competition with for a spot along with Short and Ross.

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #768 on: October 01, 2022, 02:15:52 PM »
Not sure where you heard this years draft being touted as a very good one. From what I’ve read it’s being classed as a weaker one with next years draft looming as very strong. However I feel like that’s the narrative every year so who the hell knows anymore.

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #769 on: October 01, 2022, 02:18:51 PM »
TK , you might be right
He MIGHT sneak into the 20, 21, 22 zone
He wouldn’t be picked ahead of
Prestia
Taranto
Cotchin
Hopper
Martin
Bolton

Won’t be picked on a wing
Won’t be picked as a forward

Can’t see how he’s possibly starting 18

Time will tell .. just my opinion

Yeah if I were to pick my best 22 right now including the 2 giants boys, I must admit I would have graham as 23rd man. But like I said coaches need to find the right balance. We all know what jacks strengths are and if the coaches think we need influx of that, then he’ll come right in.

Also if the past couple years are anything to go by, even if you just rely on injuries to other players to get a spot in the team, your likely to still play 15+ games.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8921
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #770 on: October 01, 2022, 02:32:14 PM »
TK , you might be right
He MIGHT sneak into the 20, 21, 22 zone
He wouldn’t be picked ahead of
Prestia
Taranto
Cotchin
Hopper
Martin
Bolton

Won’t be picked on a wing
Won’t be picked as a forward

Can’t see how he’s possibly starting 18

Time will tell .. just my opinion

Agreed however Prestia and Cotch are certainties to miss games next year.
Dusty likely playing forward more.
Bolton able to play hybrid.
Graham behind them all but likely to get enough midfield time.

Broadsword

  • Guest
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #771 on: October 01, 2022, 03:04:10 PM »
Not only will players not play every game, but they won't play every minute of the games they play. That is, it's better to think in terms of midfield ROTATIONS than starting positions on a team sheet. If he can help out with the rotations, that's his spot in the team.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #772 on: October 01, 2022, 03:08:51 PM »
That article says he rejected a trade to Port doesn't say his staying.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8921
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #773 on: October 01, 2022, 03:29:22 PM »
That article says he rejected a trade to Port doesn't say his staying.

Wonder if the Crows swooped in with a bigger deal?

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57994
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #774 on: October 01, 2022, 03:33:40 PM »
The media must be gutted they were wrong again about Richmond :snidegrin.

Good stuff, Jack. The whole point of bringing in two mids was to expand our midfield depth and rotations which we lacked this year. There's also talk of the AFL bringing in five on the bench next year, so there will likely be an extra spot for another mid in our 23.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39000
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #775 on: October 01, 2022, 06:26:52 PM »
That article says he rejected a trade to Port doesn't say his staying.

That's the spirit









 :sarcasm2
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Assange Tiger 😎

  • Bong Lord
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3393
  • Leader Of AT's Outsiders
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #776 on: October 01, 2022, 06:42:49 PM »
You can cut the Chutney crap at this point I reckon, WP.

You and others said he was just in SA to see family. He met with another club and decided it wasn't for him. Fact is he did meet with Hinkley and some of you said that was never on the table.. :shh in his heart it probably never was, but he did his due diligence. Nothing wrong with that and good luck to him in 2023.

Agree with everything Damo said about him battling for midfield time. However, can easily see Dimma throwing him on a flank despite not being suited to the position....:shh
I work in Africa and they were taking the pee out of me for saving Africa.......
"Living the dream ,not as a slave to the system. If that makes me a tosser, then I'm a proud tosser... I have plenty of time to toss"

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #777 on: October 01, 2022, 09:06:38 PM »
I reckon port missed out on Dunkley, saw that we were bringing in Taranto and hopper and thought they could lure graham back to SA as he may be squeezed out of the side. They called his manager who passed on the info onto jack and they decided it wouldn’t hurt to tour their training facilities and hear what they had to say. Jack was either unimpressed by their presentation/offer and/or never really considered leaving Richmond and therefore gave port a thanks but no thanks.

No Richmond pushing him out the door or jack actively pursuing a move elsewhere. No harm no foul.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39000
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #778 on: October 01, 2022, 11:06:02 PM »
You can cut the Chutney crap at this point I reckon, WP.


 :help

What are you on about?

Chutney deserves kudos when Chut is on the money.

I am not Chutney if that's what you are suggesting
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #779 on: October 01, 2022, 11:10:40 PM »
That article says he rejected a trade to Port doesn't say his staying.

That's the spirit









 :sarcasm2

Mate the fact is he met with Port while you suggested no he was there for family and nothing in that article says he decided to stay at Punt Rd all it mentioned he doesn't want to go to Port.