Author Topic: Patrick Naish delisted [merged]  (Read 39268 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97882
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Patrick Naish has been delisted (RFC site)
« Reply #120 on: August 24, 2021, 03:28:53 PM »
The Club has informed Patrick Naish that he will not be offered a contract for the 2022 season.

Wishing you all the best for the future, Naishy 💛

https://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/1007822/richmond-announces-list-change/

Offline TFL

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 851
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #121 on: August 24, 2021, 03:39:30 PM »
Love the way he bought into the culture etc and seems like a great kid

However just not hard enough or willing to put his body on the line

Shame but have to make these decisions

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #122 on: August 24, 2021, 03:40:39 PM »
Wish him all the best

But not at all surprised by the decision

right call by the Club
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #123 on: August 24, 2021, 04:02:39 PM »
Yeah bad luck for the guy but he just wouldn't collide with his opposite number enough, wouldn't stick tackles.  I can see why they dropped him.

Best of luck for the future

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #124 on: August 24, 2021, 05:36:56 PM »
Wishing him all the best for the future. Shame he did not make it.

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #125 on: August 24, 2021, 06:14:20 PM »
We delisting one at a time are we?

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14021
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #126 on: August 24, 2021, 06:28:39 PM »
smart decision number 1 by the club this offseason.

how long can we keep holding these duds with our picks and soldo coming back etc

Egg next to go please.



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5401
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #127 on: August 24, 2021, 06:29:28 PM »
We delisting one at a time are we?
Probably, yes, as one by one we find out those who don’t have a trade suitor.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19371
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [update]
« Reply #128 on: August 26, 2021, 12:05:35 PM »
Filth a chance to pick him up....were after him last year until the salary cap drama blew up... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97882
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [merged]
« Reply #129 on: September 01, 2021, 06:46:16 PM »
Mitch Cleary reckons Naish could end up at the Pies now that McRae is their coach.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97882
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [merged]
« Reply #130 on: October 01, 2021, 02:30:57 PM »
"Richmond have been the best team of the last four years and it just so happens I was there for that period. I felt I did everything I could, so I'm now ready for another opportunity."

- Patrick Naish

https://twitter.com/traderadio/status/1443729308946612240

Patrick Naish has had discussions with "a couple of clubs" as he searches for another opportunity after being discarded by Richmond.

The midfielder told Trade Radio that coach Damien Hardwick was transparent throughout his time at the Tigers that Naish needed to put on weight and work on his contested game.

"I'm continuing to build up my body. I've built that and I've done that, I'm up to AFL-level in terms of that, but can still get a bit stronger in my physique," Naish said.

"Then continue to work on my contested game, it probably wasn't a massive strength of mine.

"I feel like I'm most damaging on the wing, even at half-back or half-forward. I'm a pretty good decision-maker, got a pretty good kick, I can read the game well and I've got good leg speed."

https://www.afl.com.au/news/682735/delisted-tiger-hopes-for-afl-lifeline-after-pretty-positive-chats
« Last Edit: October 01, 2021, 02:48:04 PM by one-eyed »

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [merged]
« Reply #131 on: October 01, 2021, 10:45:40 PM »
Poor bugger was probably play d out of position, good luck to him

Offline Buddysucks

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1063
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [merged]
« Reply #132 on: October 02, 2021, 10:39:22 AM »
Every photo I see of this guy he has a beer in his hand. Not what you want to see from a young fringe player.

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [merged]
« Reply #133 on: October 02, 2021, 12:59:17 PM »
Didn’t they say his brother is a lot better?? (AFL)

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9928
Re: Patrick Naish delisted [merged]
« Reply #134 on: October 02, 2021, 01:21:20 PM »
Good luck to him.

4 years on the list and still 182/77. Too small for me, and he plays soft to boot because I have to admit not all skinny kids are bruise free but this one sure is.

Hard to carry blokes who play loose, unaccountable footy. Short on his own is bad enough.