« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Did we miss Houli?  (Read 4056 times)

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8117
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2017, 11:04:21 AM »
Could also be what you THINK he doesn't do...
Logged
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2017, 11:18:40 AM »
Quote from: Hard Roar Tiger on July 05, 2017, 11:04:21 AM
Could also be what you THINK he doesn't do...

It's funny YOU should say that
Logged
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13309
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2017, 12:02:54 PM »
Quote from: Tigeritis™©® on July 05, 2017, 12:14:02 AM
Didn't miss seeing him pulling out of contests avoiding any sort of contact play.

Did miss the new backhanded fist knocking out a player early in the game play. .

Add to that we didn't miss his turnovers
Logged

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2017, 12:33:00 PM »
Im not anti Markov but

Oleg against Port - 9 disposals
Bachar against Carlton-  28 disposals.
Logged
Unleash the tornado

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5648
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2017, 12:44:00 PM »
Quote from: mat073 on July 05, 2017, 12:33:00 PM
Im not anti Markov but

Oleg against Port - 9 disposals
Bachar against Carlton-  28 disposals.


And it is worse than that...


Oleg against Port - 9 disposals @ 44% eff, O marks, 1 tackle
Bachar against Carlton-  28 disposals @92.9% eff, 9 marks, 5 tackles.

Did we miss Houli?

Maybe not but the side would have been better for his inclusion.

 :cheers
Logged
Quote from: Diocletian on June 08, 2024, 04:00:35 PM
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2017, 12:45:57 PM »
The defense rests .
Logged
Unleash the tornado

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19456
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2017, 12:54:43 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on July 05, 2017, 06:55:27 AM
If you look at our kick ins in the first half - absolutely, structure completely broke down - then without doubt we certainly did

It improved after half time but it still wasn't great.


Some of Short's options were questionable but he usually shares kick-in duties with Houli anyway and Houli's kick-in options are often questionable as well, I'd also argue the main reason our structure broke down in the first half because Trengove & Dixon double-teamed Rance out of the game.

Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19456
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #22 on: July 05, 2017, 12:57:39 PM »
Quote from: 1965 on July 05, 2017, 12:44:00 PM
Quote from: mat073 on July 05, 2017, 12:33:00 PM
Im not anti Markov but

Oleg against Port - 9 disposals
Bachar against Carlton-  28 disposals.


And it is worse than that...


Oleg against Port - 9 disposals @ 44% eff, O marks, 1 tackle
Bachar against Carlton-  28 disposals @92.9% eff, 9 marks, 5 tackles.

Did we miss Houli?

Maybe not but the side would have been better for his inclusion.

 :cheers

Stop the press: 29 year-old in his 158th game had better stats in comfortable home win v bottom 4 side with a man down for most of the match than 20 year-old in his 12th game did in hard fought away win v top 4 side at full-strength.... :clapping


Quote from: mat073 on July 05, 2017, 12:45:57 PM
The defense rests .

The defence had a nice rest from having to defend Houli's turnovers....
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #23 on: July 05, 2017, 01:44:11 PM »
I see Houli as a spillage crumbing back.

His run is often negated by his disposal turnover rate.

Hasn't had a bad seasn but the future isn't him
Logged
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 759
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2017, 01:56:16 PM »
Why are many of the posters comparing Oleg to Houli?

Oleg did not play Houli's run and carry role, he played a close marking defenders . (something that Houli is incapable of doing)

At one stage Edwards had Houli's role and it switched as the game progressed.
Logged

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #25 on: July 05, 2017, 02:12:24 PM »
Quote from: yandb on July 05, 2017, 01:56:16 PM
Why are many of the posters comparing Oleg to Houli?

Oleg did not play Houli's run and carry role, he played a close marking defenders . (something that Houli is incapable of doing)

At one stage Edwards had Houli's role and it switched as the game progressed.

Coz Markov more or less took Houli's spot. And Markov should be a run and carry player. He's a gazelle. No one is having a crack at Markov, he's a got a huge ceiling. Just some think Houli is better replaced by a dish cloth - which is rubbish. Houli's a decent contributor, just has some deficiencies.
Logged

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #26 on: July 05, 2017, 03:14:14 PM »
Houli is good to have, to bring back if one of the kids gets injured
Logged
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #27 on: July 05, 2017, 05:08:30 PM »
Gee wiz this if funny stuff
Logged

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19456
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #28 on: July 05, 2017, 06:02:23 PM »
So who here honestly believes we would've won by more had Houli been playing?
« Last Edit: July 05, 2017, 06:27:55 PM by Diocletian »
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13309
Re: Did we miss Houli?
« Reply #29 on: July 05, 2017, 08:12:29 PM »
Not me
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »