« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 80   Go Down

Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 200413 times)

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #285 on: October 12, 2019, 07:21:50 AM »
Quote from: big tone on October 11, 2019, 08:58:50 PM
Quote from: Andyy on October 11, 2019, 01:23:50 PM
Geelong is stuffed.

Ablett + Taylor finished, Selwood, Hawkins and Danger not far behind. Stevens probably beyond his prime and a little washed up.

This is a team that is desperately trying to win a flag before the inevitable rebuild, but IMO they just don't quite have the talent. I'm enjoying watching them scramble to get over the line though as it's only going to hurt them for the next decade :)
I agree Andy.
I think they might drop down next year to 7 or 8th.
Giving Taylor another year is sad IMO.
HE IS FINISHED.

What is is the saddest bit re Taylor is he thinks he can go again. He showed this season (not just against us) that the game has passed him.
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #286 on: October 12, 2019, 10:11:28 AM »
Players are on a good earn
 Its hard to quit and do something else which psys alot less.
Logged

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5302
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #287 on: October 12, 2019, 10:24:58 AM »
Geelong ...

Essendon ...

Eddie McGuine ...

Adam Treloar ...
Logged

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #288 on: October 12, 2019, 01:44:17 PM »
I’ve always liked Harry Taylor in his prime. He’s a victim of idiotic coaching moves like “play him forward” where he looks as awkward as me at my old year 12 formal.

He’s truly past his prime and it’s sad in a funny way seeing him get belted in the contests. Kinda like how Travis cloke stayed in the league too long
Logged

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58196
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #289 on: October 12, 2019, 06:17:32 PM »
Imagine if they had to play the last 7 games away from Melbourne ? Wouldn't even made the 8. #AFLEQUALITY

https://twitter.com/Snaggersson/status/1182661747162992642

Richmond have played 13 games at the G this year and only 5 interstate. THE HOME GROUND ADVANTAGE SHOWS AND YET THE UMPIRES ARE STILL BACKING THEM #DOUBLEADVANTAGE #AFLGF

https://twitter.com/lmsja11/status/1177821455934873600

Yes! Why is this not talked about? @Richmond_FC have 11 games IN A ROW at the MCG - their home ground. Is this not a national competition? Are teams not expected to travel? Imagine if the @WestCoastEagles had 11 games IN A ROW at Optus. #FFS #WTF #rigged #Vicbias

https://twitter.com/nick_rose96/status/1177823609500229632


Too bad we didn't play 11 games in a row at the MCG and we won games in Perth, Adelaide, Gold Coast & Brisbane in a final  :wallywink.
Logged
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 96026
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #290 on: October 12, 2019, 06:20:18 PM »
Gil VFL Coward McLachlan should help RICHmond out by letting poor RICHmond get the Captain and best player off the team that’s coming last and trying to build from scratch and make sure they don’t give up something for him too. It’s what RICHmond are ENTITLED to.

https://twitter.com/BodsMr/status/1182870591302356992
Logged

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #291 on: October 12, 2019, 06:56:26 PM »
The cries for help are real
Logged
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #292 on: October 12, 2019, 10:43:16 PM »
Its pathetic.
Logged

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18294
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #293 on: October 16, 2019, 12:37:08 AM »
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9071
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #294 on: October 16, 2019, 09:34:43 AM »
Probably the trade period, looking at all these commissions he won't be pocketing etc
Logged

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7652
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #295 on: October 16, 2019, 10:46:31 PM »
Could tell you some stories about Ricky but I couldn’t be bothered
Logged
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18294
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #296 on: October 16, 2019, 10:48:15 PM »
Think a few here could... :shh
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #297 on: October 17, 2019, 12:29:57 PM »
I could tell you some real corkers, but I would be just making em up
Logged
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58196
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #298 on: October 17, 2019, 12:46:48 PM »
Three weeks after the Grand Final and trade period just completed yet Kane Cornes is still sooking about us and our "disgraceful" fixture this year :nopity. Today he even added we should have been made to play West Coast and Brisbane at Marvel :facepalm. Yeah Kane, good luck fitting the 70k crowd that turned up to the Brisbane game at Docklands :stupid  :rollin.
Logged
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4713
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #299 on: October 17, 2019, 01:57:04 PM »
Kane is just a massive troll.
Logged
Unleash the tornado
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 80   Go Up
« previous next »