« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 80   Go Down

Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 243583 times)

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #660 on: January 17, 2021, 05:08:34 PM »
Loool with 3 flags in the bank bunch of clowns.
Logged

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9980
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #661 on: January 17, 2021, 07:42:20 PM »
Quote from: one-eyed on January 17, 2021, 01:24:00 PM

dmw_asia
Probably get down voted here, but Richmond is looking shaky past 2021. Other than Martin the rest of the "stars" are 30+ and starting to struggle with form and/or injuries (Cotchin hamstrings, Houli calves, Reiwoldt form and knees)

popcockery
Yeah I'll pay that. Please get s*** soon though, I miss it

Jack-Schulz
Pretty sure brisbane figured them out in that qualifier

https://www.reddit.com/r/AFL/comments/ky6m9h/which_teams_are_flag_or_bust_right_now/



Haha

Brisbane played their grand final in the qualifier
Logged

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #662 on: January 17, 2021, 08:38:16 PM »
If by figured out they mean our boys were silly and played the get in f50 fast with no lynch then yeah we got figured out
Logged

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #663 on: January 18, 2021, 02:53:16 AM »
Scraping the barrel of humanity quoting reddit..... :shh
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #664 on: February 01, 2021, 06:21:06 AM »
Quote from: Matthew C-J
never would’ve guessed Richmond and collingwood get a Friday night game 10 minutes down the road!
https://twitter.com/AFL_House/status/1355661252027015169

Quote from: Bill Inkle
What a surprise AFL pets Richmond and Collingwood don't have to travel
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1355689757112737796

Quote from: Neil Stewart
ANOTHER @Richmond_FCoff-field indiscretion. Wake up @afl, this is now beyond a joke.

Time to hold @brendongale25 to account and see that action is taken to correct the disgusting culture that has set in during his tenure.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1355861566684467202
Logged

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #665 on: February 01, 2021, 04:32:57 PM »
Quote from: one-eyed on February 01, 2021, 06:21:06 AM
Quote from: Matthew C-J
never would’ve guessed Richmond and collingwood get a Friday night game 10 minutes down the road!
https://twitter.com/AFL_House/status/1355661252027015169

Quote from: Bill Inkle
What a surprise AFL pets Richmond and Collingwood don't have to travel
https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1355689757112737796

Quote from: Neil Stewart
ANOTHER @Richmond_FCoff-field indiscretion. Wake up @afl, this is now beyond a joke.

Time to hold @brendongale25 to account and see that action is taken to correct the disgusting culture that has set in during his tenure.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1355861566684467202
I hope these people aren’t allowed to breed
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #666 on: February 03, 2021, 04:07:39 PM »
Eagles fan:

Quote from: Brunswick Trap King
To be fair, we all laughed at Richmond when they suggested that was an aim a few years back yet here we are. If a team like Richmond can do it, surely a bigger club like Carlton can.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/carlton-football-club-debt-free-and-record-membership.1254155/post-68660322
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #667 on: February 05, 2021, 03:52:24 PM »
On SEN today.

Cats caller: "I'd rather follow a club that won 70% of its games and didn't win a premiership [over the past decade] than a club that only won 50% of the time and pinched a premiership".

Cats fan's txt: "Geelong was the best team last year. Richmond was only the best in the second half of the Grand Final".

Another caller: "I see the problem with Geelong is they are team with too many gun players. You look at Richmond and they have role players.". 

Russell: "Geelong was beaten by some Dustin Martin magic."

Tigers fan's txt: "Dwayne, Geelong was beaten by the whole Richmond team not just Dusty".

Russell (30 mins later): "Geelong got close last year until some freakish magic from Dusty".

Russell to Cam Guthrie: "I'd expect you'd be expecting to improve on last year which would mean winning the flag."
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #668 on: February 06, 2021, 03:06:19 PM »
Super teams like the Hawthorn of the ’80s, North Melbourne and West Coast, Brisbane in the early 2000s, Geelong and even Hawthorn from 2011-2015 were outstanding.

With no disrespect to Richmond, their successful period has been more of a testament to the system and style first, talent second. Not that there’s no talent there, but does anyone really think they’d stand up to those super teams?

https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/02/06/the-scary-stat-behind-the-demise-of-high-scoring-in-the-afl/
Logged

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #669 on: February 07, 2021, 12:55:41 AM »
People acting like the Brisbane team from 3 peat was 22x AA players. They had role players too! Namely the Scott brothers.
Logged

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4474
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #670 on: February 08, 2021, 12:44:39 AM »
Quote from: lamington on February 07, 2021, 12:55:41 AM
People acting like the Brisbane team from 3 peat was 22x AA players. They had role players too! Namely the Scott brothers.

Still the most talented side I’ve ever seen assembled. Although as an expansion team they had draft and salary cap enhancements that helped them with that.

The hawks three peat team is the one I don’t buy into. That team was no more talented their our own and they won their 3peat while the league was expanding and all the top draft picks were going to the suns and giants. So essentially the top teams stayed top while the bottom teams took longer to rebuild with all the top talent going to the expansion teams.
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #671 on: February 09, 2021, 02:02:36 PM »
Replies to the Age article about us looking to sign Hardwick to a new contract:

Quote from: Neil Stewart
Proof that Richmond have no intent on cleaning up their culture.
Quote from: Greg
Reiwoldt will retire so there's 1 idiot gone. 3 others may retire to
Quote from: Neil Stewart
Proof that Richmond have no intent on cleaning up their culture.
https://twitter.com/NeilStewartWC/status/1358704568079552512
Logged

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #672 on: February 09, 2021, 02:53:06 PM »
Has anyone read the Saints nuffies page on facebook? I think it's called Trade Rumours, News etc.

He did Richmonds rankings, gave Dusty a 9.5, Dion a 10 and Rioli a -1, then he has ranked the Saints and 50% got 10's  :snidegrin Membrey, Crouch, Butler, Marshall, Ryder, Gresham, Billings... the list goes on  :snidegrin
Logged
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #673 on: February 09, 2021, 09:48:32 PM »
Quote from: wayne on February 09, 2021, 02:53:06 PM
Has anyone read the Saints nuffies page on facebook? I think it's called Trade Rumours, News etc.

He did Richmonds rankings, gave Dusty a 9.5, Dion a 10 and Rioli a -1, then he has ranked the Saints and 50% got 10's  :snidegrin Membrey, Crouch, Butler, Marshall, Ryder, Gresham, Billings... the list goes on  :snidegrin

Saints a irrelevant club believe there own hype and Ratten topping up with alot of has beens and rejects.
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #674 on: February 11, 2021, 12:57:31 PM »
Quote from: RampagingReigner
Your richmond team still doesnt touch the North team of the 90’s. Your three flags were handouts from the AFL and flukes.
Geelong away at home
Short season asterisks flag 2020
And lucked out against GWS as geelong played a home final at the G against collingwood.
https://twitter.com/DragonVladko/status/1359435945934639106



Quote from: ApplecrossWC
Even now that Richmond are winning flags their fans still post embarrassing stuff like this looking for attention.

Oooh love me... pathetic.
Quote from: mcgarnacle
Richmond fans have got to make the most out of this dynasty. Another >30 yr drought could be just around the corner.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/richmond-the-afls-biggest-merchandise-seller-again-congratulations-champs.1254436/post-68707120
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 80   Go Up
« previous next »