Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 243314 times)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2017, 02:50:00 PM »
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success?
The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol
Jimmy Bartel did today. Said Tex can't talk about success as he hasn't achieved any. Whack!  ;D

Actually, it's all starting to backfire on Walker. People in Adelaide now openly questioning whether he's fit to remain captain given his "juvenile" outburst towards Lever.


Honestly, his performance was crap. Bad day at the office, it happens.

His post-game speech was garbage. I can forgive that because he was upset and I wanted hit ugly face to FO the stage.

But even commenting at all on Lever is seriously poor. This is a time when you go the cliches and pretend you don't mine, kind of like how coaches pretend they haven't seen footage of their own players punching blokes on the field and can't comment on whether or not is warrants suspension.


Seriously all jokes aside I don't think Tex should be captain of that club. Guy is a genuine thug, finger-pointer and sore loser.

Agree with this. In isolation they aren't terrible acts (excluding the Lever one - I think that's poor no matter the circumstances) but the bloke is just spiraling

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2017, 10:44:28 PM »
From the Adelaide Advertiser:

THOUGHT OF THE WEEK

"THEY have 10 peanuts on peanuts."


FIVEaa AFL commentator STEPHEN ROWE explaining list management at Richmond where he notes Brownlow Medallists Dustin Martin and Trent Cotchin and All-Australian captain Alex Rance would take up the bulk of the Tigers’ salary cap.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/expert-opinion/michelangelo-rucci/adelaides-fall-in-the-afl-grand-final-has-stripped-the-crows-of-the-image-of-being-the-games-darlings/news-story/2709bfafaa985b1390ec6df42f7548d0

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2017, 10:55:39 PM »
The Grand Final umpiring conspiracy theories continue on Crows forums. One of them even knocked this video up called "Free kick Richmond":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk

 :nopity



Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2017, 01:03:52 AM »
Gez love to meet them again in gf.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2017, 08:05:56 AM »
The Grand Final umpiring conspiracy theories continue on Crows forums. One of them even knocked this video up called "Free kick Richmond":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk

 :nopity

LMAO that is gold, the music makes it all the more dramatic.
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #20 on: October 22, 2017, 08:16:50 AM »
I reckon the away strip helped the jumper tugs be spotted. We did get the better of those.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #21 on: October 22, 2017, 09:31:31 AM »
 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

95% of those are the correct decisions. Ohh the salt.

Subscript. We were an outlier as far as free kick differentials for this season. In the negative. Try again Adelaide.

 :lol :lol :lol :lol

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #22 on: October 22, 2017, 10:21:53 AM »
The Grand Final umpiring conspiracy theories continue on Crows forums. One of them even knocked this video up called "Free kick Richmond":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bet9xIXVhdk

 :nopity

Build a bridge

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #23 on: October 26, 2017, 03:47:22 AM »
Crows fans don't like you recalling the fact that in 1997 they controversially got to play Geelong in a home semi-final despite the Cats finishing above them on the ladder. It was thanks to a quirk in the rules with Geelong (2nd) losing to reigning premiers North (7th) and Adelaide (4th) beating the 5th side in the first week of the finals that year. Then add Geelong's Leigh Colbert being denied a clear mark and shot on goal. Nah, no whinging about home-town umpiring  :whistle.

Then in the following year (1998), the Crows finished 5th and were flogged by Melbourne (4th) in the first week of the finals. Now days if you finish 5th and lose your out (as we learnt twice the hard way  :P ), but Adelaide got a second chance, again thanks to the rules of the day, and went on to win the back-to-back flags.

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2017, 03:59:31 AM »
These must be Tex Walker's new personalised number plates. Fitting. #gotiges 😹😹😹👎👎👎


https://twitter.com/Tommy10cents/status/923096906112176128

 :lol

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #25 on: October 26, 2017, 07:27:52 AM »
Funny but they are WA number plates.... :rollin
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #26 on: October 26, 2017, 07:59:06 AM »
ahh no wonder we haven't seen him, he moved west to hide
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Slipper

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #27 on: October 26, 2017, 09:29:03 AM »
Seems appropriate to me that a guy who likes to be called Tex would move out West, and of all things drive an x-trail!

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #28 on: October 28, 2017, 09:31:49 AM »
Brett "igomissinginfinals" Deledio
The club that keeps giving.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #29 on: October 28, 2017, 09:41:17 AM »
Brett "igomissinginfinals" Deledio

100% correct