Author Topic: State of Umpiring [merged]  (Read 397097 times)

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Can someone explain what holding the ball was tonight?
« Reply #1410 on: July 24, 2020, 11:33:56 PM »
The difference in the 80’s & early 90’s was that there wasn’t the stupid rule called “prior opportunity” nor was there a stupid “made an attempt” classification.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Can someone explain what holding the ball was tonight?
« Reply #1411 on: July 24, 2020, 11:47:24 PM »
If you had time to take a second step you had prior opportunity....umpires also seem to let blokes off more often than not because they had no team mate to give it to...that's hardly the stuffing point you dippoos... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Can someone explain what holding the ball was tonight?
« Reply #1412 on: July 25, 2020, 08:49:18 PM »
Different rules tonight in the Port-vs-StK game. Back to the old interpretation for HTB. So much for consistency :::). Makes you wonder if there's been another directive overnight from HQ to ease off from the ridiculous whistle-happy umpiring that spoiled our game.     
« Last Edit: July 25, 2020, 09:23:32 PM by WilliamPowell »
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1413 on: August 06, 2020, 03:02:42 PM »
This is a nonsense’: Richmond left feeling like deliberate out of bounds rule was changed and they weren’t told

August 4, 2020

Both Richmond and the viewers at home have been left puzzled by a series of umpiring decisions around the deliberate out of bounds rule on Tuesday night.

The Tigers were the victims of two consecutive free kicks paid under the rule within 30 seconds, leaving Fox Footy’s commentators asking whether the rule had been changed and no-one was told.

The first free kick was paid against Liam Baker who dribbled a kick out of the Tigers’ defensive 50, bouncing towards teammate Marlion Pickett but then suddenly bouncing out of bounds.

Despite coming extremely close to finding a target, Baker was still penalised.

“It rolled about a metre in front of Pickett,” St Kilda great Nick Riewoldt said on Fox Footy.

Melbourne champion Garry Lyon added: “Essentially any kick out of bounds between the arcs is gonna be paid.

“The umpire must be a good judge of footy talent, because the players can’t bend the ball like that, so he’s assessed that was exactly what he meant.”

Then only a few seconds later, Ivan Soldo’s accidental kick out of bounds was also penalised for deliberate.

“Oh no,” Lyon said. “I’m telling you Rooey, last man to kick it or touch it gives a free kick!”

Riewoldt responded: “Then just bring the rule in.”

They weren’t the only ones confused by the calls.

Just make it last touched and be done with it. This is a nonsense.
— Andy Maher (@AndyMaherDFA) August 4, 2020

https://www.aflcrowcast.com/this-is-a-nonsense-richmond-left-feeling-like-deliberate-out-of-bounds-rule-was-changed-and-they-werent-told/

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1414 on: August 08, 2020, 05:05:35 PM »
Absolutely pathetic to pay them one way only

Best one was Charlie stay out, Charlie rucks and no free

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40319
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1415 on: August 08, 2020, 05:06:37 PM »
 
Absolutely pathetic to pay them one way only

Best one was Charlie stay out, Charlie rucks and no free

 :clapping
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3747
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1416 on: August 08, 2020, 07:02:36 PM »
Between the commentating on Fox and the umpiring the game was contrived for port to win, pathetic the number of incorrect disposals Port had and the free kicks were bewildering

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1417 on: August 08, 2020, 07:05:30 PM »
It stinks

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1418 on: August 08, 2020, 07:46:34 PM »
I've always wondered whether the AFL is rigged. There have always been suspicious tribunal decisions and the umpuring has always been poor. This is for 40 years it's been poor not just this year or last. They have NFL to look at which is the gold standard in umpiring and soccer which is blatantly corrupt and they have chosen closer to the latter then the former. I really do wonder if the high ups have ordained Port or Brisbane will win this year.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1419 on: August 08, 2020, 10:50:12 PM »
According to the Port supporters they were robbed 11 times.  :rollin
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1420 on: August 09, 2020, 03:41:13 PM »
According to the Port supporters they were robbed 11 times.  :rollin

They need to change their to Port Boganlaide

Bunch of ferals on ice

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1421 on: August 09, 2020, 05:22:41 PM »
They're the South Australian Collingwood...'nuff said... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1422 on: August 09, 2020, 06:16:42 PM »
They're the South Australian Collingwood...'nuff said... :shh

and the foxtel port.

did you listen to that commentary yesterday Dio. FMD that was rubbish. Grey falls forward and fakes it yet eddie was virtually screaming for a free. Worst examples of bias i have ever heard yesterday.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Knighter

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2744
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1423 on: August 09, 2020, 06:58:05 PM »
Fat Ed is a salty old campaigner - nough said

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4499
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #1424 on: August 09, 2020, 10:20:41 PM »
We had the better of it for sure
The free kick numbers quite often lie and this was a prime example game