Author Topic: Matty White [merged]  (Read 88436 times)

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #510 on: March 29, 2014, 07:22:00 PM »
Had a blinder coming on as sub today, 2 goals and a number of possessions, looked super quick in comparison to our guys.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #511 on: March 29, 2014, 07:29:16 PM »
That's how he often looked coming on for us last year. We don't have a replacement for him yet which sucks.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #512 on: March 29, 2014, 07:36:00 PM »
Good on him, they are on fire atm, look really strong, fit and fast. 3rd youngest list in the comp too.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #513 on: March 29, 2014, 07:54:18 PM »
That's how he often looked coming on for us last year. We don't have a replacement for him yet which sucks.
Banfield is his replacement but he can't get anywhere as a rookie.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #514 on: March 29, 2014, 07:57:30 PM »
That's how he often looked coming on for us last year. We don't have a replacement for him yet which sucks.
Banfield is his replacement but he can't get anywhere as a rookie.

Hence we don't have a replacement  :-[

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #515 on: March 29, 2014, 08:18:30 PM »
Woeful decision to throw money at conca, ultimately squeezing white out of the pic.

As stated. We have no replacement.
Clever list management, fellas.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline flea03

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #516 on: March 29, 2014, 08:36:29 PM »
conca will be a gun, had a major hammy op

where we messed up was keeping foley


Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9974
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #517 on: March 29, 2014, 09:25:47 PM »
Foley for 3 years yeah? FFS...

Should have kept Whitey even if he was permanent sub...

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #518 on: March 29, 2014, 09:31:49 PM »
He s a perfect sub whitey  a classic game of his where he ll chalk up 9-10 possies and kick a couple in a half, the weird thing is give him a full game and he ll generally only ever get 2 or 3 possies more than that,  ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #519 on: March 29, 2014, 09:35:22 PM »
Club wasnt prepared to give the length of contract that port were. it was not  so much to do with money, they just weren't prepared to give an extended contract and put with with claws bitching for said period of time.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9974
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #520 on: March 29, 2014, 09:42:00 PM »
Foley 3 years.

Whitey 1 year.

Laughable. Whitey was at least tough, quick and good by foot. Foley used to be all those things. And White tried hard. Richmond supporter who just wanted the club to win...

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #521 on: March 29, 2014, 09:49:24 PM »
Reality was whitey had one good year in his 8 at RFC and is oft plagued by dodgy hammies, we'd be derelict offering a player with a cv like that 3 years
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7359
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #522 on: March 29, 2014, 09:51:01 PM »
Didn't white leave because he didn't want to be a sub ffs get it right dudes

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #523 on: March 29, 2014, 10:23:30 PM »
Didn't white leave because he didn't want to be a sub ffs get it right dudes
Incorrect. He wanted a 3 year contract but probably would have accepted 2 - the club was only prepared to give him 1.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Matty White [merged]
« Reply #524 on: March 31, 2014, 12:15:03 AM »
Good on him, they are on fire atm, look really strong, fit and fast. 3rd youngest list in the comp too.
THAT IS NOT CORRECT OR EVEN RELEVANT. Whoops again i apologise for caps on.
There are  5 or 6 sides whos overall list age is younger than ports not sure cant be bothered looking it up. theres another 7 to 10 sides including port,  again dont have the figures in front of me,who are all aged 23 yrs and so many days. its neither here nor there. who

what is relevant is the age of the players who will play the majority of games. to me about 25 players at all clubs will play more than half the games work out the age of these players. i bet ports top 25 are up there with most other clubs.
it really is a fallacy that most players under 22 yrs of age impact clubs seasons. the simple truth is most are in early development with no guarantee of them making it. trhe thing these players do do is impact the overall age of the list though.