Author Topic: official polak is @ richmond  (Read 15747 times)

Offline Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2449
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2006, 02:07:54 PM »
Looks like we are the only team to downgrade fiist round picks in the super draft. We must be seeing something that nobody else sees.

The only time I see things that nobody else can is when I am drunk.    Hey its Miller time
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #31 on: October 13, 2006, 02:14:15 PM »
Just keep in mind, I wouldnt think there is much difference between pick 8 and pick 13, this draft is very deep. Reality check is that Aaron Davey didnt even get drafted and was overlooked and Rookied.  I reckon we have done very good in getting Polak and still retaining a first round pick.  ;)

Offline Fwoy3

  • Un-unRichmondlike
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Shut the eff up Jack!
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #32 on: October 13, 2006, 02:17:27 PM »
I agree, we've effectively drafted Polack at pick 42. Not too bad at all :gotigers
My parents bought me a Richmond jumper and enrolled me in a junior footy clinic in 1981...look at me now.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57951
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #33 on: October 13, 2006, 02:18:32 PM »
Just keep in mind, I wouldnt think there is much difference between pick 8 and pick 13, this draft is very deep. Reality check is that Aaron Davey didnt even get drafted and was overlooked and Rookied.  I reckon we have done very good in getting Polak and still retaining a first round pick.  ;)

Then why trade away a third round pick as well if the draft is deep. Sorry Jack we caved in and hence stuffed up. Just having 2 picks in the top 50 of a superdraft is a disgrace. 
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #34 on: October 13, 2006, 02:22:04 PM »
I agree, we've effectively drafted Polack at pick 42. Not too bad at all :gotigers

Agree

Offline Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2449
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #35 on: October 13, 2006, 02:22:57 PM »
Lets just wait and see who falls though to pick 8 that we miss out on before we say there is no difference between pick 8 and 13. The way I see it there are 6 players that they say are good enough to be pick 1 in this draft , some clubs may just stuff up and one of those players may fall to to pick 8.  There will be none at 13 thats for sure.

There sure is a difference then.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #36 on: October 13, 2006, 02:24:13 PM »
losing 42 for 60 is a farce Jacko. Being stuck with players because they backended contracts is also a farce. Staggering and inexcuseable.

Ramps, I agree with your thoughts on being stuck with players who have backended contracts but thats the salary cup issue and fitting of players in it

Offline Fwoy3

  • Un-unRichmondlike
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Shut the eff up Jack!
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #37 on: October 13, 2006, 02:26:43 PM »
I am at least willing to give Polack a chance before slitting my wrists...this reminds me of all the people 1 year ago saying Simmonds was the worst trade ever, and to sack Miller...the same people praising Simmo this year...I will follow RICHMOND's decisions...I SUPPORT Richmond!
My parents bought me a Richmond jumper and enrolled me in a junior footy clinic in 1981...look at me now.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #38 on: October 13, 2006, 02:28:32 PM »
I dont recall bagging Simmonds infact i think people were laughing how that dealing was organised. We all support Richmond but some of us are tired of failure and mediocrity thats all and when we see clubs rebuild in a better fashion then well...I think we have a right to ask questions.

letsgetiton!

  • Guest
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #39 on: October 13, 2006, 02:28:43 PM »
Just keep in mind, I wouldnt think there is much difference between pick 8 and pick 13, this draft is very deep. Reality check is that Aaron Davey didnt even get drafted and was overlooked and Rookied.  I reckon we have done very good in getting Polak and still retaining a first round pick.  ;)

its about time i had support on this! i agree with you totally :clapping

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #40 on: October 13, 2006, 02:29:21 PM »
No need to slit wrists, its only a game of football ;D

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38963
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #41 on: October 13, 2006, 02:31:39 PM »
I am at least willing to give Polack a chance before slitting my wrists...this reminds me of all the people 1 year ago saying Simmonds was the worst trade ever, and to sack Miller...the same people praising Simmo this year...I will follow RICHMOND's decisions...I SUPPORT Richmond!

Happy to give Polak a chance he's a tiger now :gotigers

Just keep in mind, I wouldnt think there is much difference between pick 8 and pick 13, this draft is very deep. Reality check is that Aaron Davey didnt even get drafted and was overlooked and Rookied.  I reckon we have done very good in getting Polak and still retaining a first round pick.  ;)

Fair call Jack it just seems a massive wait from pick 26 to pick 60
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Fwoy3

  • Un-unRichmondlike
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Shut the eff up Jack!
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #42 on: October 13, 2006, 02:33:22 PM »
at least today proves we have passion  :gotigers
My parents bought me a Richmond jumper and enrolled me in a junior footy clinic in 1981...look at me now.

Offline Fwoy3

  • Un-unRichmondlike
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
  • Shut the eff up Jack!
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #43 on: October 13, 2006, 02:37:44 PM »
Weaver's analysis of the pick 8 situation...not the messiah, just a very intelligent junior footy boy  :lol

Which is exactly why I have been saying all along that I expected us to be a team looking to trade our pick.

Gumbleon, Leunberger, Hansen and Gibbs suit us perfectly but will be gone.

Selwood is too slow for us

Armitage and Hislop are inside midfielders, which are not the type we go for.

Sellar is a clone of Pattison (although a slightly better one). He won't ruck and he will struggle in a KP.

Thorp is not quite a KP player and not quite a ruck-rover. He is the most likely if we keep our pick, but again not really our type.

Reiwoldt? Don't make me laugh.

Collard and Jetta are small half-forwards. Tippett a big gorilla FF. O'Brien a back-pocket specialist.

The guys that are the ones that we'd be looking at - Benjamin, Pettard, O'Keefe, Hawksley, Boak, Edwards, Houlihan, Connors - will all still be available at 13.

Said it over and over again. I am not sitting on the fence when I say I don't know who to take at pick 8. The players around that mark don't fit our profile. I have always thought we would end up reaching for a player that we could have gotten at 15.

No problem at all with trading pick 8.
My parents bought me a Richmond jumper and enrolled me in a junior footy clinic in 1981...look at me now.

letsgetiton!

  • Guest
Re: official polak is @ richmond
« Reply #44 on: October 13, 2006, 02:40:03 PM »
Weaver's analysis of the pick 8 situation...not the messiah, just a very intelligent junior footy boy  :lol

Which is exactly why I have been saying all along that I expected us to be a team looking to trade our pick.

Gumbleon, Leunberger, Hansen and Gibbs suit us perfectly but will be gone.

Selwood is too slow for us

Armitage and Hislop are inside midfielders, which are not the type we go for.

Sellar is a clone of Pattison (although a slightly better one). He won't ruck and he will struggle in a KP.

Thorp is not quite a KP player and not quite a ruck-rover. He is the most likely if we keep our pick, but again not really our type.

Reiwoldt? Don't make me laugh.

Collard and Jetta are small half-forwards. Tippett a big gorilla FF. O'Brien a back-pocket specialist.

The guys that are the ones that we'd be looking at - Benjamin, Pettard, O'Keefe, Hawksley, Boak, Edwards, Houlihan, Connors - will all still be available at 13.

Said it over and over again. I am not sitting on the fence when I say I don't know who to take at pick 8. The players around that mark don't fit our profile. I have always thought we would end up reaching for a player that we could have gotten at 15.

No problem at all with trading pick 8.
:thumbsup