Author Topic: Kelvin Moore [merged]  (Read 13481 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95131
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Kelvin Moore [merged]
« on: August 26, 2007, 08:11:29 PM »
What did we think of Kel's game tonight?

Offline bluey_21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Road Runner
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2007, 08:33:06 PM »
6.5/10

richmondrules

  • Guest
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2007, 09:01:29 PM »
Did some good thinks tonight. I don't know if Terry's made up his mind on him yet, doesn't know what to do with him. To delist or not to delist, that is the question. If we keep him for another year I won't be too disappointed. Depends on whether we miss anything from keeping his possi on the list occupied.

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2007, 09:03:24 PM »
he was real good tonight, a couple of times tried teh right things and make teh play but luck went against him

he has a good size and will bulk up more, and is lightning quick and has good hands and a good kick

we must persist with him , he has what it takes, and along with luke and thursty will  form a gr8 trio in defence

Bull

  • Guest
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2007, 09:06:02 PM »
Thought he played well but no sure if we keep him though.

Offline bluey_21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Road Runner
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2007, 09:06:14 PM »
my trouble with moore is his inconsistency at AFL level, cannot seem to string together successive good games.

Agreed that purely from a general look at him he looks perfect for AFL

190cm, good hands, solid skills, lightning quick

... but just doesn't look AFL to me

Good VFL player though  :thumbsup

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8400
  • In Absentia
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2007, 09:43:00 PM »
my trouble with moore is his inconsistency at AFL level, cannot seem to string together successive good games.

He has one in a row now, let's see how he goes next week.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2007, 09:47:08 PM »
He's 23 and has done sweet FA tbh for 3-4 years.


I think we still have to let him go.


He might have sat himself ahead of Meyer now though . . .
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline Mopsy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1679
  • Once a Tiger always a Tiger
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2007, 09:49:03 PM »
He's 23 and has done sweet FA tbh for 3-4 years.


I think we still have to let him go.


He might have sat himself ahead of Meyer now though . . .
Just the right age to come good - it's just a confidence thing now IMO

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2007, 10:08:18 PM »
He's 23 and has done sweet FA tbh for 3-4 years.


I think we still have to let him go.


He might have sat himself ahead of Meyer now though . . .
Just the right age to come good - it's just a confidence thing now IMO

i agree
« Last Edit: August 26, 2007, 10:47:05 PM by xXx »

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2007, 10:09:00 PM »
Career was on the line, still is next week. I think we'll defer a decision on him for a while, wait until we asses the tall talent on offer in the draft.

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2007, 10:35:54 PM »
He's 23 and has done sweet FA tbh for 3-4 years.


I think we still have to let him go.


He might have sat himself ahead of Meyer now though . . .
Just the right age to come good - it's just a confidence thing now IMO

Well he owes us big time so lets hope if we keep him he delivers in spades for having so much patience.  :thumbsup
EAT EM ALIVE!

Online torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5271
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2007, 12:37:28 AM »
don't be fooled !!!

he is useless ...

DELIST HIM !!!

he is a waste of time ...

has been here for to long ...

don't care what he did last night ... (even though i didn't watch it!!!)

he should be off our list ... (sorry Kelvin ... no offensive dude!!!)

 

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2007, 10:26:24 AM »
when his not injured his a good footballer
showed some good signs tonight maybe he likes the big stage

you know now that our young playing list has a taste of the big stage & have tasted a win under them conditions things could swing around quickly

l was impressed with the way everyone put in


Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57804
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Kel Moore
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2007, 03:34:53 PM »
Kel got the unsung hero this week from Plough in EOTT. Terry said it was the first time Moore showed he was able to set up as an attacking defender at AFL level. Still it's hard to see one game saving a career after 4 years on the list.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd