Author Topic: Wallace  (Read 25894 times)

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: Wallace
« Reply #15 on: August 03, 2004, 09:57:07 AM »
Hawks, Tigers both want Wallace
By Stephen Rielly, Jake Niall
realfooty.theage.com.au
August 3, 2004


Eade cancelled his second presentation for the Tigers yesterday after Richmond football director Greg Miller told him that Wallace was his first choice.


http://realfooty.theage.com.au/realfooty/articles/2004/08/02/1091432110901.html?oneclick=true

This is quite concerning if Wallace isn't in the bag.  Why would Miller tell Eade that Wallace is first choice even before signing him.  This would suggest he is signed.  Surely they can't be so stupid and risk losing a very good second option in Eade by saying this to him.

Does anyone have half an idea on anything?

Offline om21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 598
  • Original Melbourne 21
    • Original Melbourne 21
Re: Wallace
« Reply #16 on: August 03, 2004, 10:27:13 AM »
Pity about Casey......KNighter could have come back with him.

Look for Terry to bring in his own fitness team. Once the announcement is official I will provide you all with a summary of his fitness man.....
Den uparxei Ellada xwris AEK.

Finally our new webage: http://www.original21.com/melbourne

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: Wallace
« Reply #17 on: August 03, 2004, 10:34:34 AM »
Quote
IMO if Wallace chooses Hawthorn over us based on the above assessment then IMO we should be thankful he didn't take the job. On the other hand, if he chooses us over the Hawks then it's good to hear he understands where we are at and that we will need time to rebuild via youth. In that case he is the right man for the job.

Agree entirely.
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Wallace
« Reply #18 on: August 03, 2004, 03:53:24 PM »
Patrick Smith said today he aint backing away from the story in The Australian yesterday. Said it came from such a high-up source that he doesn't dispute it!
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Wallace
« Reply #19 on: August 03, 2004, 04:17:30 PM »
Hey mightytiges, the job is right ;)

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Wallace
« Reply #20 on: August 03, 2004, 04:24:29 PM »
I just want to say again - I am rellay enjoying this - it is fun.  :rollin

Actually being in the papers for positive reasons for a change .

I was listening to Gold104 this morning while I was eating my Weetbix and that dill they have doing their sports reports "The Coach" the call him was saying regarding the Wallace/Richmond Coaching situation "I am so over it"  :lol maybe that's because he has been saying since Danny quit that Eade would be our next coach and basically said there was no way Wallace would be interested in us....  :lol :rollin

It is great to hear alll these commentators squirming  :thumbsup
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: Wallace
« Reply #21 on: August 03, 2004, 05:19:13 PM »
Apparently there's a finals series in about 4 weeks time, however you wouldn't know it if you read the papers and listened to the radio.  It's all Richmond.

With this type of media coverage why wouldn't Wallace want to coach us, him being a media whore and all.  Bring it on !!
Does anyone have half an idea on anything?

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Wallace
« Reply #22 on: August 03, 2004, 05:34:35 PM »
I wouldn't think our sponsors would mind all this media coverage either with our contracts up for renewal  :).

Melbourne, Saints and Geelong might be up the top of the ladder but they don't sell papers like the Tiges do  :thumbsup.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline tigers80

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Wallace
« Reply #23 on: August 03, 2004, 05:55:46 PM »
thats it we might be crap on the field, but off the field we can sell newspapers for rupert and his merrie men.

Bulluss

  • Guest
Re: Wallace
« Reply #24 on: August 03, 2004, 08:03:17 PM »
All of this off field trouble that is looming at Hawthorn is all good for Terry going with us. Reported on the news tonight that Don Scott is likely to call for a full spill of the board.

All this as well as not having a CEO, Terry is surely going to tell them on thursday thanks but not thanks. I am back to Tigerland.

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Wallace
« Reply #25 on: August 03, 2004, 08:06:38 PM »
Apparently there's a finals series in about 4 weeks time, however you wouldn't know it if you read the papers and listened to the radio.  It's all Richmond.

With this type of media coverage why wouldn't Wallace want to coach us, him being a media whore and all.  Bring it on !!

Its been us all year but not for all the right reasons.

Realistically we've had about 30% of all press this year which is great if they can keep going off the back of it ino 2005.

All of a sudden we are looking like a marketable product again.


AMAZING how much better i feel just knowing the potato man is leaving seasons end *sighs with glee*

Offline JohnF

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1514
  • ROFLMAO
Re: Wallace
« Reply #26 on: August 03, 2004, 08:48:05 PM »
Everyone loves a circus and Richmond are the ring leaders.

lmfaoooooo@Wallace the media whore. Well said Harry Krishna.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Wallace looks for stability
« Reply #27 on: August 04, 2004, 01:51:09 AM »
Wallace looks for stability
By Jake Niall
realfooty.theage.com.au
August 4, 2004

The capacity of Hawthorn and Richmond to recruit players and manage their political crises will be critical to Terry Wallace's choice of coaching job.

Wallace, who will make a presentation to the Hawthorn board tomorrow night, will be offered four-year contracts by both the Hawks and Tigers and similarly lucrative remuneration, but it will be other factors - particularly the stability of either club, the health of its salary cap and recruiting prospects - that will be most influential in his decision.

Wallace is understood to slightly favour Richmond ahead of his old club, but this is largely because the Tigers have already made their detailed pitch - including a four-year offer - and the former Bulldogs coach is yet to hear the full details of Hawthorn's counter-bid.

The Hawks remain confident of making a persuasive pitch, which will include their belief that former director and outspoken ex-premiership skipper Don Scott will not return to the board and that the club will return to its trademark stability.

Sources yesterday said Wallace was likely to choose his preferred club over the weekend and then sit down with his management and the chosen club and secure a deal. On current market rates, Wallace is certain to be paid in excess of $500,000 a year.

Hawthorn, meanwhile, has followed Richmond by contacting Rodney Eade and informing the former Sydney coach that Wallace is its preferred candidate. Should Wallace choose Richmond, the Hawks will then turn their attention to seasoned coaches Eade and Gary Ayres and perhaps assistants Mark Harvey and Gary O'Donnell.

Ayres last night confirmed that he held only "informal" discussions with his close friend, Hawthorn football director Dermott Brereton, about the Hawthorn coaching position and had not yet been formally interviewed.

Like Eade, Ayres will have to wait until Wallace has made his call before he can entertain the Hawthorn job. Richmond has made clear that Eade is its second choice and will offer him the job should Wallace decline.

Wallace is less concerned with the staffing situations at the two clubs, though Richmond - with virtually all its assistants and football department staff out of contract - will be able to give him a blank canvas on which to create his own future.

But it is the political volatility at both clubs and their recruitment prospects that Wallace will weigh up in coming days, as Hawthorn attempts to negotiate a peace agreement with Scott, who has given the board an ultimatum and threatened a spill unless it meets certain demands.

The Richmond board, which convened last night without its key decision-maker and director of football Greg Miller, has put its power struggle between president Clinton Casey and challenger Brendan Schwab on hold until the coaching position is settled.

Hawthorn will tell Wallace that while its salary cap for 2005 is tight due to the massive contracts in place for next year, such as the $600,000-plus committed to Nick Holland and other costly deals, the club will have enormous scope in 2006, when several hundred thousand dollars of room, if not more, immediately opens up.

Richmond, too, has some salary cap concerns, though its restraints relate more to finances - the club is set to lose $2 million this year and is cutting its football budget, with total player payments earmarked for a significant reduction. The club is currently paying, in effect, 100 per cent of the cap, plus veterans' allowances.

http://realfooty.theage.com.au/realfooty/articles/2004/08/03/1091476491999.html
« Last Edit: August 04, 2004, 01:52:53 AM by mightytiges »
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Wallace looks for stability
« Reply #28 on: August 04, 2004, 02:01:54 AM »
Quote
The Richmond board, which convened last night without its key decision-maker and director of football Greg Miller

Hmmm...Interesting!

Quote
Richmond, too, has some salary cap concerns, though its restraints relate more to finances - the club is set to lose $2 million this year and is cutting its football budget, with total player payments earmarked for a significant reduction. The club is currently paying, in effect, 100 per cent of the cap, plus veterans' allowances.

3% is a "significant reduction" but as we've said before it isn't slash and burn stuff. We will reducing our TPP, where player contracts allow, to a more realistic level in line with where our list is at. Given there are now strong signals that we will be indeed drafting for youth then paying 97% of the salary cap shouldn't be a hinderance to our new coach.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Wallace
« Reply #29 on: August 04, 2004, 07:20:11 AM »
Easy to achieve when your list will be 2-3 players short next year. ;)
Also with one or two big names traded.