when you state played every game in season 2006 until he did his knee makes alot of sence
did he not do his knee in season 2006 l think you said round 12 so if thats the case he missed half the season of 2006 so that dont make he played every game
is that correct your starting to confuse me
"Played the rest of that season, all of 2005 and every game in 2006 until his knee in round 12."
"Played every game in 2006 until the knee injury."
What on earth is so confusing about this?
l know he missed alot of 2004 season & all of 2007 & his missed 5 games this season
That's where the fact ends (although it is only 4 this season so far), and no-one has disputed this. It is still only 2 blocks from injury - 1 from OP with a full recovery and 1 from his knee reco which he is still rehabilitating from. So those arguing how injury prone he is are simply not right.
maybe 22 by years end
Yep, might be, and THEN and only THEN is the right time to assess his future, not now while he is still recovering. That's all I have been saying all along if you care to reread.
so add half of 2006 season thats alot of service missing in action & those $$$$ oh my gosh
has a rookie been brought up yet for Cogs long term injury we might have another Kingy in the list
We did have him on the long term list last year and this made way for a rookie. He's not on the list this year because he is obviously coming on at a rate acceptable to the football department with the likelihood of playing footy again in the near future. On another level, our inability or reluctance to rookie list players in the past few years has been much more based on our financial circumstances and not about player availability.