Author Topic: Richmond Team vs Bumbers  (Read 6710 times)

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1679
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2008, 05:39:15 PM »
A win is a win but i think i might only live for another 12 months after that game. How difficult can it be to milk the clock for 2 minutes!!! I think we managed four turnovers resulting in at least two standing shots for goal and another snap. I just dont think we are good enough skill wise to be doing it and it nearly cost us another game. Also not sure if anyone has noticed but at critical points in games Kelvin Moore seems to be going for big screamers and spilling the ball only for a turnover to result in a goal to the opposition. According to my count his butter fingers have cost us at least 5 goals at vital stages of games, otherwise he has i must admit been one of our better defenders.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #31 on: July 19, 2008, 05:54:18 PM »
I would rest Cotchin in games against Geelong and Hawthorn where we have little chance of winning.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2008, 05:59:14 PM »
Richmond
B: Chris Newman, Luke McGuane, Kelvin Moore
HB: Jordan McMahon, Joel Bowden, Matt White
C: Trent Cotchin, Shane Tuck, Richard Tambling
HF: Mitch Morton, Jack Riewoldt, Brett Deledio
F: Nathan Brown, Cleve Hughes, Adam Pattison
Foll: Troy Simmonds, Kane Johnson, Nathan Foley
I/C: Daniel Connors, Shane Edwards, Dean Polo, Jay Schulz,
EMG: Will Thursfield, Daniel Jackson, Alex Rance

Quite a young side - we should remember.

1/2 the 22 is more or less 21 years old.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13523
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #33 on: July 19, 2008, 06:01:33 PM »
A win is a win but i think i might only live for another 12 months after that game. How difficult can it be to milk the clock for 2 minutes!!! I think we managed four turnovers resulting in at least two standing shots for goal and another snap. I just dont think we are good enough skill wise to be doing it and it nearly cost us another game. Also not sure if anyone has noticed but at critical points in games Kelvin Moore seems to be going for big screamers and spilling the ball only for a turnover to result in a goal to the opposition. According to my count his butter fingers have cost us at least 5 goals at vital stages of games, otherwise he has i must admit been one of our better defenders.

yes i did notice that. i also noticed schulz is going backwards. i hope polak comes back to play and schulz is shown the door.
what a dud he is...He too goes for the big mark when it punched to the boundary line.
we let too many easy goals go against us when the ball should be punched out of bounds..

great game by browny, foley and it was tambling's best game this year by far...

overall good game and happy to beat those scumbags

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #34 on: July 19, 2008, 06:07:36 PM »
Bowden is copping a lot of flack for the way the game ended, but the truth of it is that there were no options to go to, the Bombers were actually manning up extremey well. Better to do what he did than kick to a contest and turn it over.




Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #35 on: July 19, 2008, 06:09:50 PM »
Chris Newman 6, Good performance
Luke McGuane 5, Thought he was beaten
Kelvin Moore 6, Just Ok
Jordan McMahon 7, Was good throughout
Joel Bowden 6, Average throughout, smart at the end
Matt White 7.5 Was very good I thought today
Trent Cotchin 5, Maybe getting tired, Id start to manage his season, rest v Geel & Hawks.
Shane Tuck 6, Good again
Richard Tambling 5, Good in parts, needs to kick goals on the run and not miss
Mitch Morton 7, excellent, 4 goals from a hff, my thanks to the WCE.
Jack Riewoldt 4, wasnt really in it, not his day today.
Brett Deledio 7, Goals, leadership, good game.
Nathan Brown 8, Outstanding in the last. Won us the game.
Cleve Hughes 3, Not in it at all, 1 goal, has the polak incident cost him psychologically?
Adam Pattison 5, I like how he competes, often breaks even. Didnt really follow his game today.
Troy Simmonds 8, Excellent today, 1 of afew who tried to win us the game. Excellent.
Kane Johnson 6, Did ok, average game for him i thought, once again didnt really follow his game.
Nathan Foley 8,Outstanding again, showed leadership when it counted. Helped win us the game.
Will Thursfield 5, I thought our backs were beaten,
Shane Edwards 7, Gave him 7 thought he had a good game with some really good efforts throughout. Good signs.
Dean Polo 6, Did some decent hard stuff, not a classy player but got the job done mostly.
Jay Schulz 7, I thought he was ok today, some efforts were really good.


jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #36 on: July 19, 2008, 06:57:10 PM »
Hey Ramps.
You gave Cleve 3 too many, should be 0. 
Tambling 5 nah, more like 2

jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #37 on: July 19, 2008, 07:02:36 PM »
What an embarrasing win

I agree, both teams were extremely poor and in parts were comical , BOTH TEAMS.

Would be embrasssing if we played finals.

If it wasnt for Morton and Brown ,we get beat, considering they had 19 men after half time, our 2nd half was poor.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #38 on: July 19, 2008, 07:14:25 PM »
1st half I thought we were ok. 2nd half a complete rabble.

jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #39 on: July 19, 2008, 07:32:53 PM »
1st half I thought we were ok. 2nd half a complete rabble.

Considering they had 19 men, and we had a big lead at half time, we were TERRIBLE. A complete RABBLE

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #40 on: July 19, 2008, 07:39:58 PM »
1st half I thought we were ok. 2nd half a complete rabble.

Considering they had 19 men, and we had a big lead at half time, we were TERRIBLE. A complete RABBLE

SCOREBOARD

jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #41 on: July 19, 2008, 07:41:58 PM »
1st half I thought we were ok. 2nd half a complete rabble.

Considering they had 19 men, and we had a big lead at half time, we were TERRIBLE. A complete RABBLE

SCOREBOARD



You must not have went, both teams were a RABBLE

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #42 on: July 19, 2008, 07:46:21 PM »
4 point win I am happy u nuts r f9cked

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #43 on: July 19, 2008, 07:47:37 PM »
whingy whinny little stuffn bi getb fioked

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Richmond Team vs Bumbers
« Reply #44 on: July 19, 2008, 08:58:49 PM »
4 point win I am happy u nuts r f9cked

your doing some of your best internet comedy work tonight cub.