Author Topic: JON  (Read 6508 times)

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
Re: JON
« Reply #45 on: April 27, 2009, 12:49:20 PM »
I agree WP! JONs best game for the club. With a bit more confidence he could become a stable of the side. HArd to believe really.... :whistle

Stripes

your optimism is fantastic but gee he played one servicable game. thats one in 4 years, hardly ground breaking stuff.

Good on em for giving it a crack but he should be nowhere near our best 22.


I agrre with Stripes,  hard to belive but thought he had little bit of Micheal Long in the way he played - yes I know he's no Micheal Long yet but I was proud of him with all the mud he has had to carry I belive he took the next step - has a faw steps to go yet, but I hope he suceeeds!



Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: JON
« Reply #46 on: April 27, 2009, 01:50:45 PM »
Sorry but he ain't no kid anymore.
Given he only turned 21 two months ago, I'd say he's still a kid

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: JON
« Reply #47 on: April 27, 2009, 09:37:27 PM »
i am TOTALLY astounnded that some people think he played well. :banghead
Watched the replay again on One HD last night.
He made several significant errors , especially in the 3rd quarter, .
One of the many reasons the RFC is where is it ,as some players havent or more importantly cant "'step up to the plate""
Jarrod falls into the latter, as his kicking skills and decision making are very poor.
His kicking is extremely bad., especially in traffic and when in transition.
Positives for Jarrod that he was prepared to be the "'hit-up target"" although was afraid to kick when he did gain possesion.
Might be sum trade value and years end.
I say leave him in the team for another week, the alternative is to bring back Schulz, NO THANK YOU.

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
Re: JON
« Reply #48 on: April 27, 2009, 10:01:28 PM »
i am TOTALLY astounnded that some people think he played well. :banghead
Watched the replay again on One HD last night.
He made several significant errors , especially in the 3rd quarter, .
One of the many reasons the RFC is where is it ,as some players havent or more importantly cant "'step up to the plate""
Jarrod falls into the latter, as his kicking skills and decision making are very poor.
His kicking is extremely bad., especially in traffic and when in transition.
Positives for Jarrod that he was prepared to be the "'hit-up target"" although was afraid to kick when he did gain possesion.
Might be sum trade value and years end.
I say leave him in the team for another week, the alternative is to bring back Schulz, NO THANK YOU.

MMM, didnt notice the contested marking, forward pressue and precision passing to others in better position. If you think we should leave him in the team says volumes to me. He might fall in a heap but at face value it was pleaseing to see him compete. I must admitt those lead marks were very good . Anyway I hope he steps up again this week.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: JON
« Reply #49 on: April 27, 2009, 10:16:09 PM »
i am TOTALLY astounnded that some people think he played well. :banghead
Watched the replay again on One HD last night.
He made several significant errors , especially in the 3rd quarter, .
One of the many reasons the RFC is where is it ,as some players havent or more importantly cant "'step up to the plate""
Jarrod falls into the latter, as his kicking skills and decision making are very poor.
His kicking is extremely bad., especially in traffic and when in transition.
Positives for Jarrod that he was prepared to be the "'hit-up target"" although was afraid to kick when he did gain possesion.
Might be sum trade value and years end.
I say leave him in the team for another week, the alternative is to bring back Schulz, NO THANK YOU.

MMM, didnt notice the contested marking, forward pressue and precision passing to others in better position. If you think we should leave him in the team says volumes to me. He might fall in a heap but at face value it was pleaseing to see him compete. I must admitt those lead marks were very good . Anyway I hope he steps up again this week.

well said, certainly did enough to warrant another game, let him build on that, next week he may be shooting for goal rather than look to give off, made space well and took some nice marks...thought someone said he just turned 21...whoa, veteran huh ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4801
Re: JON
« Reply #50 on: April 28, 2009, 06:49:44 PM »
OMG....JON has to stay now.His last 3 appearances in the seniors has resulted in 3 tiger victories.He can be our new Rabbits foot :lol
Unleash the tornado

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: JON
« Reply #51 on: May 03, 2009, 05:31:36 PM »
BUMP.
Was hopless today.
7 kicks.
we cannot afford to play sub standard players.
We aint going anywhere playing him.
He actually kicked into the man on the mark twice again today :banghead

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: JON
« Reply #52 on: May 03, 2009, 05:40:03 PM »
u r getting very boring jack, jons efforts in the first half kept us  in the game

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: JON
« Reply #53 on: May 03, 2009, 07:44:59 PM »
oh dear, thats why he will be back at the burgers next week.
7 kicks in a game of football hardly warrants getting a game the following week., especially when you are a very average footballer

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: JON
« Reply #54 on: May 03, 2009, 07:49:27 PM »
funny what a difference a week makes.

Last week people on here were comparing him to Michael Long FFS.

Back to reality boys!! It was typical JON today. Kicking into the man on the mark and dancing around on the spot looking confused.

Was not the worst by any means but if thats our future geez we need to tank for the next 10 years

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: JON
« Reply #55 on: May 03, 2009, 08:41:55 PM »
funny what a difference a week makes.

Last week people on here were comparing him to Michael Long FFS.

Back to reality boys!! It was typical JON today. Kicking into the man on the mark and dancing around on the spot looking confused.

Was not the worst by any means but if thats our future geez we need to tank for the next 10 years



Er are we watching the same game? Played well in the 2nd qtr, drifted out of it in the 2nd half but did not see much of him.
He'll get another game unless Browny is fit - which TBH is not that fair, Browny needs some reserves time.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: JON
« Reply #56 on: May 03, 2009, 09:32:38 PM »
funny what a difference a week makes.

Last week people on here were comparing him to Michael Long FFS.

Back to reality boys!! It was typical JON today. Kicking into the man on the mark and dancing around on the spot looking confused.

Was not the worst by any means but if thats our future geez we need to tank for the next 10 years



Er are we watching the same game? Played well in the 2nd qtr, drifted out of it in the 2nd half but did not see much of him.
He'll get another game unless Browny is fit - which TBH is not that fair, Browny needs some reserves time.

like someone mentioned before re: Browny thinks he is too good for Coburg.

This is why being Wallace favourite pet i expect he will come straight into the seniors and they just aint right.

regarding JON he showed nice glimpses i agree with you there and as i said he wasn't our worst but gee we need to rebuild further if that is our depth.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40271
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: JON
« Reply #57 on: May 03, 2009, 09:46:58 PM »
For the limited time he got on the ground he did OK. Certainly not as good as last week but he certainly wasn't our worst (that would go to the bloke in number 20 but back to the topic)

I will be interested to see what the replay shows because I am sure it wouldn't show his work off the ball



"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Gordon Bennett

  • Guest
Re: JON
« Reply #58 on: May 04, 2009, 11:19:26 AM »
oh dear, thats why he will be back at the burgers next week.
7 kicks in a game of football hardly warrants getting a game the following week.
of course you unfairly don't mention his 5 handballs, but that wouldn't help your position.
Anyway, using your criteria of  needing 7 kicks to warrant a game next week, then Moore (5k), Morton (5k),Graham (5k), Rance (2k) and Nahas (6k) all won't be selected. :'(

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5687
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: JON
« Reply #59 on: May 04, 2009, 11:39:20 AM »
I thought JON was ok.

If Jack snapped teh ball over his head and we levelled the score. The game turned into a draw. We woudln't be eating our own "again" this week. So for mine lets focus on next week, we play like we did yesterday and we beat Brisbane no matter what the show up as.

Brown must play VFL football if Cousins had too
Go Tigers!