Author Topic: Angus Graham [merged]  (Read 51097 times)

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #285 on: May 19, 2011, 06:44:39 PM »
Should always be the taller player IMO

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #286 on: May 19, 2011, 06:57:29 PM »
The Footscray players were getting into Rance about it. I'm not sure whose mistake it was but they seemed to think it was his.
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #287 on: May 19, 2011, 09:55:48 PM »
What we have is 4 ruckman all u23 you pessimistic toad.

Long term it's a healthy postion to be in given ruckman don't start finding. Best form untill 25/26
not getting into a slanging match all i have to say is its only a healthy situation if you are reasonably sure you have at least 2 decent ruckmen on your list. most clubs can categorically say they have at least one if not two at the least afl standard ruckmen. the idea is to actually compete and find better than other sides.
clearly this is not the case. bloody hell every man and his dog on most richmond forums have been telling me graham is the best we have.

all im asking is what is the likely hood given where each player comes from and their weaknesses, of them actually making it.
no need for the abuse at the end of the day i want exactly the same thing as you. that is we find a couple of decent ruckmen. i just happen to think we dont have long term ruckmen on our list and think we need to load up a bit and ensure we do find a couple of good ones.

what would you propose we do if graham browne and derickx dont make it and vickery becomes primarily a forward. myself and many others have already written graham off as any thinking football follower should.so in effect we are trying to find 2 ruckmen from 3.  it just does not happen.
without a doubt come seasons end graham should be delisted and his spot should be taken by another ruckman. we need to turn em over until we find the quality we want.

so what do we do just let matters rest and risk in 3 yrs time having to start from scratch. or do we cater now to the worst case scenario load up with a few extra ruckmen in an attempt to ensure we find what we need. what is there to lose we are in rebuild if we end up with 4 good ruckmen we sell two to the highest bidder for decent picks. this is what well run clubs have done and do.

anyway like i said no need for the abuse we want the same thing i at least come up with a way that i think will help us actually find some decent ruckmen and could well benefit us at draft time in the future.

i will say again its only healthy if you actually  have ruckmen who become bonafide  afl standard players we have to cater for failure not every player we take is going to make it. you wouldnt realise this given the way supporters talk about every single player on our list. we have to be realistic and in being realistic and its only my opinion graham has to go. we wont know if vickery is a decent ruckman for two yrs and the odds atm of both browne and derickx making it are short. like you i hope the whole friggen lot of them become guns but common sense says it wont happen.
im not putting the players down im just saying hey lets cover our bets here.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #288 on: May 21, 2011, 11:15:17 PM »
Except for the problem that Graham beats Browne in every single drill at training

browne has ticker.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Graham is back (RFC)
« Reply #289 on: July 21, 2011, 05:00:44 PM »
Gus is back


Ruckman Angus Graham has been recalled to the Richmond side for Sunday’s Round 18 clash with Geelong at Etihad Stadium.

Graham, who hasn’t played at AFL level since the Tigers’ Round 8 match against the Western Bulldogs, replaces Andrew Browne, who has been omitted


http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/119135/default.aspx

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #290 on: July 24, 2011, 01:55:16 PM »
Working hard, I don't rate him but hats off for working pretty hard.
Go Tigers!

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #291 on: July 24, 2011, 01:58:44 PM »
Agreed.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #292 on: July 24, 2011, 02:06:12 PM »
Graham today pretty much sums RFC up.

Tries hard but has limited or no impact.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #293 on: July 24, 2011, 02:15:24 PM »
I personally like him as a player, however I just dont rate him highly
He has good height and body size and tries but is just not chop
Even when we played freo at the G, Sandilands dominated the entire game, but Gus never gave imo

It does some up richmond doesnt it
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #294 on: July 24, 2011, 02:22:42 PM »
Not the answer for finals let alone a flag but hats off for having a dig.
Go Tigers!

Online Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2450
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #295 on: July 24, 2011, 04:03:19 PM »
Im sorry but I rate Brownes effort >> than Gus and I have always supported Gus. Gus basicly does nothing around the ground, even the players think twice about giving it to him.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #296 on: July 24, 2011, 04:07:45 PM »
Graham and Browne shouldnt be on the list at the end of the year.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #297 on: July 24, 2011, 04:46:52 PM »
Gus easily won more hitouts today :o. 28 to Gus while West had 17.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #298 on: July 24, 2011, 04:54:00 PM »
Graham and Browne shouldnt be on the list at the end of the year.

Agree.
Go Tigers!

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Angus Graham [merged]
« Reply #299 on: July 24, 2011, 04:54:56 PM »
Gus easily won more hitouts today :o. 28 to Gus while West had 17.

That's why West is down the pecking order at Geelong and Blake is even further back now that the father and son rule has served its purpose and he played in a premiership.
No and no to either ruckman.