Author Topic: Cricket thread  (Read 113070 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98002
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #780 on: July 03, 2023, 12:46:17 PM »
Thought we had seen this before. Jonny Bairstow attempting to catch Marnus Labuschagne stepping out of his crease two days ago. #Ashes @wwos @9NewsAUS

WATCH: https://twitter.com/samdjodan/status/1675575411344908288


https://www.foxsports.com.au/video/cricket/the-ashes/bairstow-attempted-dubious-runout-first!861497

-------------------------

Broad is also a hypocrite. A flashback to him pretending to be not out and refusing to walk after clearly nicking it to slip.

This Stuart Broad



WATCH: https://twitter.com/charlesdavis75/status/1675650486115119104

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98002
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #781 on: July 03, 2023, 04:02:15 PM »

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #782 on: July 03, 2023, 04:23:39 PM »
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9936

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58592
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #784 on: July 03, 2023, 05:08:25 PM »
Karma says hi Pommies :shh.


Not really in the spirit of the game but when you've cheated out of a dismissal the day before, don't expect any favours from the opposition when you switch off and walk out of your crease before the call of over.

Lol
What a load of rubbish
Interesting when Nathan Lyon comes out in support of it being the correct decision

As for the Bairstow dismissal .. ranks with mankads in spirit of the game discussions .. but stiff poo Johnny, off you go .. but to think Starc’s catch decision played any role is laughable
And Glenn McGrath called the not out decision a "disgrace".
https://twitter.com/bbctms/status/1675203596139241474
Just like the AFL, former players can be openly honest and critical unlike current players who have to toe the line.

Yep
And plenty have rightly called out Glenn McGrath for being wrong and needing to learn the rules of the game

Below should help explain

https://twitter.com/Ben_Wisden/status/1675213536002293760?s=20
Two wrongs don't make a right. That was a clean catch too. What's the bowler meant to do in that situation when he is diving forward? Smash his face into the turf so his hands don't hit the ground? :facepalm

Neither of them are wrong

It’s the rule!!!

It isn’t cheating and it isn’t correct

I’m not saying I love the rule , but it’s the rule, and both decisions are 100% correct

Calling it cheating is laughable
It's the interpretation of that rule that is wrong. This was never an issue until the TV umpire became overlord. That rule is meant to be for instances where a running fielder catches the ball in play (has ball control) but his momentum causes him to step on or over the rope (body not in control) which is of course not out and 4 runs. It's not meant to be used for situations where the hand with the ball after a clean controlled catch touches the ground because the fielder has dived or slid forward to take a catch. 

33.2.1 A catch will be fair only if, in every case
either   the ball, at any time
or        any fielder in contact with the ball,
is not grounded beyond the boundary before the catch is completed.  Note Laws 19.4 (Ball grounded beyond the boundary) and 19.5 (Fielder grounded beyond the boundary).

19.4.2 The ball in play is to be regarded as being grounded beyond the boundary if:
- a fielder, after catching the ball within the boundary, becomes grounded beyond the boundary while in contact with the ball, before completing the catch.

33.3 Making a catch
The act of making a catch shall start from the time when the ball first comes into contact with a fielder’s person and shall end when a fielder obtains complete control over both the ball and his/her own movement.

33.2.2 Furthermore, a catch will be fair if any of the following conditions applies:
33.2.2.1 the ball is held in the hand or hands of a fielder, even if the hand holding the ball is touching the ground, ...

https://www.lords.org/mcc/the-laws-of-cricket/caught


Erasmus' new interpretation would mean running in to take a catch and throwing the ball up in the air to celebrate while still moving would be not out :facepalm.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58592
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #785 on: July 03, 2023, 05:15:37 PM »
From the Telegraph

https://twitter.com/KimGould/status/1675685304974606341

Bartholomew Frinton-Smythe
Humphrey Wigbert-Porter
Quinten Breckenridge

Surely these names are made up?

If they are real names of MCC members then that's hilarious  :rollin.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #786 on: July 03, 2023, 05:23:29 PM »
Sounds like a Melbourne coterie group - although the only Breckenridges I ever knew were working class Catholics from Epping. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4471
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #787 on: July 03, 2023, 06:44:54 PM »
From the Telegraph

https://twitter.com/KimGould/status/1675685304974606341

Bartholomew Frinton-Smythe
Humphrey Wigbert-Porter
Quinten Breckenridge

Surely these names are made up?

If they are real names of MCC members then that's hilarious  :rollin.


 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40243
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #788 on: July 03, 2023, 08:20:57 PM »


Erasmus' new interpretation would mean running in to take a catch and throwing the ball up in the air to celebrate while still moving would be not out :facepalm.

It isn't a new interpretation as there is a precedent for this decision form a T20I NZ v Bangladesh. Similar situation, went upstairs and the TV umpire gave it out

I don't agree with the rule as it is written as it open to interpretation but as it stands technically Erasmus has made a correct call based on his opinion and how the rule is written

Now onto Broad

What a hypocritical dope he is

He snicks a ball to first slip back in 2013 and refused to walk. Suggest he worry more about what he is going to be remembered for

Poms clearly have very short and/or selective memories when it comes to what poor Jonny B has been trying and what they did at Lords on 6 June 2022 versus NZ

As for McCallum - check with Jonny and Stuart on how to spell hypocrite
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4471
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #789 on: July 03, 2023, 08:41:43 PM »


Erasmus' new interpretation would mean running in to take a catch and throwing the ball up in the air to celebrate while still moving would be not out :facepalm.

It isn't a new interpretation as there is a precedent for this decision form a T20I NZ v Bangladesh. Similar situation, went upstairs and the TV umpire gave it out

I don't agree with the rule as it is written as it open to interpretation but as it stands technically Erasmus has made a correct call based on his opinion and how the rule is written

Now onto Broad

What a hypocritical dope he is

He snicks a ball to first slip back in 2013 and refused to walk. Suggest he worry more about what he is going to be remembered for

Poms clearly have very short and/or selective memories when it comes to what poor Jonny B has been trying and what they did at Lords on 6 June 2022 versus NZ

As for McCallum - check with Jonny and Stuart on how to spell hypocrite

You got one part of this wrong WP

He didn’t snick it to slip. He fair dinkum SMASHED IT

Which makes it all far worse

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #790 on: July 03, 2023, 10:16:08 PM »
Thoroughly enjoyed watching broad walk back to the pavilion after acting like a total tool by planting his bat on the crease after every ball and gesturing to the aussies whether that was long enough.

When you look at it again, bairstow didn’t even plant his bat, he dragged his feet on the crease sure but his bat was never even grounded as much as the English want to tell you he did.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9936
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #791 on: July 03, 2023, 11:07:17 PM »
Thoroughly enjoyed watching broad walk back to the pavilion after acting like a total tool by planting his bat on the crease after every ball and gesturing to the aussies whether that was long enough.

When you look at it again, bairstow didn’t even plant his bat, he dragged his feet on the crease sure but his bat was never even grounded as much as the English want to tell you he did.

Was too soon also.

No way dead ball IMO

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58592
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58592
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #793 on: July 04, 2023, 05:27:20 AM »
I'm Sorry, I'll Read That Again (The Goodies with some of the Monty Python members such as John Cleese) did a song acting as MCC members.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT4qObpOzeI

"The noise, the barricades, the trenches, the fighting ... you know what I mean?"
"War?"
"No .... Cricket!"


"The trouble with long-haired fellows today is they're too damn violent. Spend too much time fighting and marching. Ought to put 'em in the Army: that'd soon stop 'em fighting and marching!"
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9936
Re: Cricket thread
« Reply #794 on: July 04, 2023, 08:08:49 AM »

https://twitter.com/WestIslandSambo/status/1675827990268383233/photo/1

lol

Gold, love it.

I hear on the radio that the spokesperson for the England PM has come out and echoed Stokes' sentiment about it.

What an absolute whinge of the highest order. A whole country making a fool of themselves, sooking collectively.