Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: Infamy on February 08, 2010, 08:07:00 PMQuote from: jackstar is back again on February 08, 2010, 08:02:12 PMQuote from: smokey_58au on February 08, 2010, 07:54:07 PMQuote from: jackstar is back again on February 08, 2010, 07:03:57 PMQuote from: Infamy on February 08, 2010, 06:15:24 PMWe ended up making money on losing the TAC sponsorship. He did us a favour!You would have to be the most idiotic poster on here,We are paying a large percentage of his salary in 2010, how on earth can he be doing us a favor, Hey hold on, its not 1st of April is it, You have proven would a complete and utter goose you really are.You might have misread Infamy's post Jack. He was referring to the money we 'made' from losing the TAC sponsorship. AFG's deal was worth a significant amount more to the club, so even if we are paying some of his 2010 salary (which I hadn't heard or read by the way) we will still be a long long way in front. How much of it are we paying?Paying an extremely large percentage Stop changing the subject you twit. You are the one who mentioned that he cost us money losing us the TAC sponsorship when he actually made us money for doing that. End of story, nothing to do with his contract at Port.Its amazing the positive spin the club puts on things to calm you Ferrals
Quote from: jackstar is back again on February 08, 2010, 08:02:12 PMQuote from: smokey_58au on February 08, 2010, 07:54:07 PMQuote from: jackstar is back again on February 08, 2010, 07:03:57 PMQuote from: Infamy on February 08, 2010, 06:15:24 PMWe ended up making money on losing the TAC sponsorship. He did us a favour!You would have to be the most idiotic poster on here,We are paying a large percentage of his salary in 2010, how on earth can he be doing us a favor, Hey hold on, its not 1st of April is it, You have proven would a complete and utter goose you really are.You might have misread Infamy's post Jack. He was referring to the money we 'made' from losing the TAC sponsorship. AFG's deal was worth a significant amount more to the club, so even if we are paying some of his 2010 salary (which I hadn't heard or read by the way) we will still be a long long way in front. How much of it are we paying?Paying an extremely large percentage Stop changing the subject you twit. You are the one who mentioned that he cost us money losing us the TAC sponsorship when he actually made us money for doing that. End of story, nothing to do with his contract at Port.
Quote from: smokey_58au on February 08, 2010, 07:54:07 PMQuote from: jackstar is back again on February 08, 2010, 07:03:57 PMQuote from: Infamy on February 08, 2010, 06:15:24 PMWe ended up making money on losing the TAC sponsorship. He did us a favour!You would have to be the most idiotic poster on here,We are paying a large percentage of his salary in 2010, how on earth can he be doing us a favor, Hey hold on, its not 1st of April is it, You have proven would a complete and utter goose you really are.You might have misread Infamy's post Jack. He was referring to the money we 'made' from losing the TAC sponsorship. AFG's deal was worth a significant amount more to the club, so even if we are paying some of his 2010 salary (which I hadn't heard or read by the way) we will still be a long long way in front. How much of it are we paying?Paying an extremely large percentage
Quote from: jackstar is back again on February 08, 2010, 07:03:57 PMQuote from: Infamy on February 08, 2010, 06:15:24 PMWe ended up making money on losing the TAC sponsorship. He did us a favour!You would have to be the most idiotic poster on here,We are paying a large percentage of his salary in 2010, how on earth can he be doing us a favor, Hey hold on, its not 1st of April is it, You have proven would a complete and utter goose you really are.You might have misread Infamy's post Jack. He was referring to the money we 'made' from losing the TAC sponsorship. AFG's deal was worth a significant amount more to the club, so even if we are paying some of his 2010 salary (which I hadn't heard or read by the way) we will still be a long long way in front. How much of it are we paying?
Quote from: Infamy on February 08, 2010, 06:15:24 PMWe ended up making money on losing the TAC sponsorship. He did us a favour!You would have to be the most idiotic poster on here,We are paying a large percentage of his salary in 2010, how on earth can he be doing us a favor, Hey hold on, its not 1st of April is it, You have proven would a complete and utter goose you really are.
We ended up making money on losing the TAC sponsorship. He did us a favour!
I know nothing about football, nothing what soever.
Yes, I am stupid.
Won't be at all surprised to see Schulz do well if Chocco persists with him up forward.
Comedy hour?The man is dud.I'm just glad we got something for him.Enjoy Chocco.
Quote from: tigersalive on February 10, 2010, 12:20:39 PMComedy hour?The man is dud.I'm just glad we got something for him.Enjoy Chocco. We'll see TA. I think he may surprise but then again I thought Myer may too but hey no one is perfect now are they
Sarge has taken 10 marks, had 13 possies and kicked 1.2. I'm sure some in the media will claim another Port gain from Richmond based on one NAB Cup game .
Quote from: mightytiges on February 13, 2010, 06:47:02 PMSarge has taken 10 marks, had 13 possies and kicked 1.2. I'm sure some in the media will claim another Port gain from Richmond based on one NAB Cup game .Mate ,I watched the entire game.He is lasy, didnt want to chase, etc etcHe is a dud.If he was any good, should of kicked 8 with the opportunites Port has up forward
Quote from: jackstar is back again on February 13, 2010, 07:28:41 PMQuote from: mightytiges on February 13, 2010, 06:47:02 PMSarge has taken 10 marks, had 13 possies and kicked 1.2. I'm sure some in the media will claim another Port gain from Richmond based on one NAB Cup game .Mate ,I watched the entire game.He is lasy, didnt want to chase, etc etcHe is a dud.If he was any good, should of kicked 8 with the opportunites Port has up forward Did you see his 2nd effort in 4th when he went back with the flight and then got up and chased some Crows player? It helped force a turnover. I thought he was alright. Definitely presented for Port.If he should have kicked 8, then why did no one on their team kick more than 3?