« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 81   Go Down

Author Topic: David Astbury [merged]  (Read 263084 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1125 on: October 03, 2020, 03:39:27 AM »
David Astbury

Took the seven marks and mostly held his own in the backline. Also had the four tackles. Can’t be too upset with him.

Rating: 7

Source: Foxsports
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1126 on: October 10, 2020, 05:07:38 AM »
David Astbury

Wasn’t given too much work given Richmond’s ample defensive numbers, with the tall occasionally throw into the ruck.

Rating: 5

Source: Foxsports
Logged

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1127 on: October 10, 2020, 10:38:46 AM »
Wasnt bad in ruck gave us a chop out.Against Port talls may be needed back in defence.
Logged

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17868
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1128 on: October 10, 2020, 01:42:38 PM »
Astbury & Broad backing up in the ruck won't cut the mustard against Lycett & Ladham.... :shh
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1129 on: October 10, 2020, 02:17:20 PM »
Quote from: Diocletian on October 10, 2020, 01:42:38 PM
Astbury & Broad backing up in the ruck won't cut the mustard against Lycett & Ladham.... :shh

Cate went with Stanley and a backup how they go ?
Logged

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17868
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1130 on: October 10, 2020, 02:50:42 PM »
They lost.... :shh :shh
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1131 on: October 17, 2020, 05:07:31 AM »
Dave wasn't bad as backup ruck.
Logged

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3741
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1132 on: October 17, 2020, 05:21:16 AM »
Quote from: georgies31 on October 17, 2020, 05:07:31 AM
Dave wasn't bad as backup ruck.

Agreed, did well on first watch.
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1133 on: October 17, 2020, 06:22:27 AM »
David Astbury

Five touches, four of which were intercepts. Didn’t do a whole heap.

Rating: 4

Source: Foxsports
Logged

Offline Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2450
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1134 on: October 17, 2020, 08:01:54 AM »
Quote from: one-eyed on October 17, 2020, 06:22:27 AM
David Astbury

Five touches, four of which were intercepts. Didn’t do a whole heap.

Rating: 4

Source: Foxsports

Bet he would of felt like he did plenty after the game. Stats don't always tell the tale and his chopout in the ruck was vital.
Logged
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1135 on: October 17, 2020, 08:08:21 AM »
Quote from: Diocletian on October 10, 2020, 01:42:38 PM
Astbury & Broad backing up in the ruck won't cut the mustard against Lycett & Ladham.... :shh

That didnt age all that well

Astbury was huge, allowed Nank to play 69% (53% @ 1/2 time) & Nank dominated the last
Logged

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2204
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1136 on: October 18, 2020, 03:20:19 PM »
Agree , just watched the replay Dave Astbury played a great  team game that reflected on how well Nank played in the last quarter, he wasn’t exhausted.
Logged

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1137 on: October 18, 2020, 06:14:36 PM »
This week will suit him to against Bilavs or Hawkins.He actually has alot of strength gives a good contest.
Logged

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39004
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1138 on: October 18, 2020, 06:19:41 PM »
Quote from: georgies31 on October 18, 2020, 06:14:36 PM
This week will suit him to against Bilavs or Hawkins.He actually has alot of strength gives a good contest.

Agree re Hawkins but not Biclavs. Biclavs far to mobile and quick
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3745
Re: David Astbury [merged]
« Reply #1139 on: October 18, 2020, 06:24:11 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on October 18, 2020, 06:19:41 PM
Quote from: georgies31 on October 18, 2020, 06:14:36 PM
This week will suit him to against Bilavs or Hawkins.He actually has alot of strength gives a good contest.

Agree re Hawkins but not Biclavs. Biclavs far to mobile and quick

Maybe Balta better option for Biclavs then does he take them in defence or centre square the ruck duty Biclavs.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 81   Go Up
« previous next »