Author Topic: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]  (Read 16899 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #75 on: May 09, 2010, 05:50:39 PM »
Even though Polak missed that goal I think he has been great today.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14245
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #76 on: May 09, 2010, 05:51:22 PM »
which player was it that cost us that goal? Daniel Jackson directly kicks it to an Adelaide guy which results in a goal.

stuff me that was terrible.

Tackling is where it should be every week we run out on the field.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59427
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #77 on: May 09, 2010, 05:52:49 PM »
Was that the siren? A premature adjudication  ;D

Now it's the siren.

Rich    3.3    6.5-41
Adel    3.0    5.3-33

Goals: Nahas 2, Riewoldt, White, Edwards, Tuck
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #78 on: May 09, 2010, 05:53:19 PM »
which player was it that cost us that goal? Daniel Jackson directly kicks it to an Adelaide guy which results in a goal.

eff me that was terrible.

Tackling is where it should be every week we run out on the field.

No it wan't Jackson Unless we are watching different games, Polo and Edwards have been responsible for the Crows last two goals via turnovers.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4897
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #79 on: May 09, 2010, 05:54:45 PM »
How good is it just to see the tigers in a contest....Enjoying every minute of this game.
Unleash the tornado

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #80 on: May 09, 2010, 05:56:32 PM »
which player was it that cost us that goal? Daniel Jackson directly kicks it to an Adelaide guy which results in a goal.

eff me that was terrible.

Tackling is where it should be every week we run out on the field.

No it wan't Jackson Unless we are watching different games, Polo and Edwards have been responsible for the Crows last two goals via turnovers.
It was Rance.  Polo has been disappointing.  Selfish.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59427
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #81 on: May 09, 2010, 05:58:39 PM »
The Crows are as bad as us which is keeping the scores close but our pressure has been good and we've actually been the better side. The good sign is virtually everyone is contributing. We should be a couple of more goals in front actually in we made the most of our attacks. Up to us now to run out the game. Need to start the 3rd quarter positively and try to get a break on the scoreboard.


All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5858
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #82 on: May 09, 2010, 05:59:02 PM »
It wasnt Jackson Daniel161 it was Rance.. :banghead

Ge with this work ethic and the fact we are getting smashed in stoppages who knows what we could do.

McGuane been good on Tippett. No Crow player is having a big impact.
Deledio working really really hard off hard back. 3 great runs down the outer wing for inside 50s that resulted in scoring shots.
Riewoldt is on and working hard. His marking back with the flight was superb.
Cotchin has made some mistakes, more than usual, but hes everywhere.
Nahas dangerous
Edwards been really good early
Polak has been superb.

We're doing well whilst getting smashed out of stoppages and playing 2 men down with Jackson and Rance kicking it to Adelaide player more than Richmond...

Tackling best its been all year.

Job is half done.
Go Tigers!

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #83 on: May 09, 2010, 06:00:37 PM »
which player was it that cost us that goal? Daniel Jackson directly kicks it to an Adelaide guy which results in a goal.

eff me that was terrible.

Tackling is where it should be every week we run out on the field.

No it wan't Jackson Unless we are watching different games, Polo and Edwards have been responsible for the Crows last two goals via turnovers.
It was Rance.  Polo has been disappointing.  Selfish.

Yep Rance gave the direct turnover straight to their player in the forward line but the other two were as I said. So 3 goals from turnovers, stop that and they score no more. Our backline is great today Webberly has done a few nice things too, very happy with Polak presenting himself around the ground.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4897
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #84 on: May 09, 2010, 06:02:17 PM »
How good is it not having jurassic park (Simmo) in the team.Go Polly.
Unleash the tornado

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100438
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #85 on: May 09, 2010, 06:05:42 PM »
Disposals

Moore     15
Edwards  14
Cotchin   12
Collins    11
Deledio   11
Jackson   11
Tuck        10
Martin       9

Total:  180 - 157
Marks    57 - 47

Tackles  43 - 39
Hitouts  17 - 37

Moore, Edwards, Jacko and Cotch in the top 5 on AFL live stats.

http://xml.afl.com.au/swf/live_stats.htm?gameID=10280707

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7393
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #86 on: May 09, 2010, 06:06:11 PM »
If the star watches he may see what Hardwick is trying to do !!!
Not saying we are gunna win, just take note.....
Easy to criticise  ;)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59427
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #87 on: May 09, 2010, 06:08:09 PM »
How good is it not having jurassic park (Simmo) in the team.Go Polly.
Yep no 30 year olds today. Tuck, Newy, Moore and Polak the only senior players above 23 y.o. They said we've got 8 players who've played less than 20 games.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59427
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #88 on: May 09, 2010, 06:10:22 PM »
Tear down AAMI stadium  :pray

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100438
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Winless Vs Winless - Tigers vs Crows [merged]
« Reply #89 on: May 09, 2010, 06:11:12 PM »
Inside 50s: 19 - 22

Clearances: 10 - 5