You cant deny we should have taken Heppell who was a much safer bet?
In saying that Reece will be a serviceable player but no Chris Judd...
Why was heppel a safer bet?
He was expected to go earlier but supposedly slipped because of long term doubts over his knee.
how strong a character is heppel? Di Hird play him primarily as a loose man in defence early in the season because he felt that heppel needs to be nursed along, whereas dimma was happy for conca to learn some harsh lessons early on?
conca wont be the best draft pick taken last year, but i believe he was one of the safest and will more than likely be a very valuable player to the club.