For the sake of actual political discussion rather than pot shots and silly rhetoric, what are people's reasons here for voting yes or no?
Actual logical reasons please rather than general wing allegiance.
I have been ambivalent for a long time and am still on the fence a lot.
I don't think the proposed legislation is specific enough but I also don't see any real potential harm for the voice. Any indigenous body can already make a submission to government for change but maybe the voice will encourage it to happen more.
Acknowledging indigenous people in the Constitution also seems quite harmless.
I'd answer Andyy but will only cop the normal whacks for being a "leftie"
My only comments are this:
I've been absolutely staggered how little people know about our constitution, what's in it and how it works. Understand our constitution and you soon realise that some of the statements being made as fact are simply not true. Section 51 in particular says "Hi"
And finally I posted this a few weeks back. Referendums shouldn't be about politics. I got lambasted about that comment but facts are they shouldn't be about politics but this one has sadly mostly been about politics. You'd hope we'd be better than that but clearly we are not
IMHO the Referendum won't succeed.