Author Topic: Changes next week for the Hawks game?  (Read 18005 times)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #30 on: May 20, 2012, 12:25:07 PM »
I have seen many coburg games this season and the one thing I have noticed about Arnott is that he seems to blow up after not much effort ,appears to not have much of an engine at this stage...yes he's hard,tuff and has skill.

Should be sub then?

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #31 on: May 20, 2012, 12:38:08 PM »
We'll beat this mob, Gerks Guarantee  :thumbsup

(no refunds)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #32 on: May 20, 2012, 12:57:33 PM »
:gotigersftp://
Just watching the replay now.2 goals we got in last quarter were due to Milller blocking the opposition to allow Cotch to mark

What about the othee 99% of millers game?

 :lol...thats it, no-one questions his effort but forwards are paid to finish off all the good work up field..to that end they have failed misertably and Miller is part of the guilty party
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #33 on: May 20, 2012, 12:58:58 PM »
forwards are paid to kick goals.
Jack Riewoldt ??

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #34 on: May 20, 2012, 01:05:02 PM »
Jack I agree Riewoldt has been skata this year, but Miller you can say a million things about him but the simple thing is this.....

If Jack pulls his finger out of golo he can win games of footy for us.

Miller at his best has the same impact as a below par Jack.

Miller was woeful last night and that goal he missed in the last quarter for me sealed the deal.

Yes others missed shots too but that goal goes in and the margin gets back to 3 points after they kicked 2 goals to regain the lead. Anything could have happened.

Did I say he can't kick from 40.

You are not going to drop a Coleman Medallist in favour of a bloke getting 5 touches a game with no impact.


Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #35 on: May 20, 2012, 01:08:30 PM »
Miller had 13 disposals
Riewoldt 8
King 9

Dont know who got 5 disposals ::)

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #36 on: May 20, 2012, 01:16:39 PM »
The stats are irrelevent Jack.

Ok so it was 13 who cares. He's still a dud. :thumbsup

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #37 on: May 20, 2012, 01:40:40 PM »
Miller had 13 disposals
Riewoldt 8
King 9

Dont know who got 5 disposals ::)

Games are won on the back of the work done in the first half. For much of football. For our CHF (most important postion imo) miller to have only 2 touches of the ball. And be general slow and non agile kills our us.

His lack of possies is not unlike his season or overall average.

At least vickery has potential ffs

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5004
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #38 on: May 20, 2012, 01:42:56 PM »
Jack needs to lead harder, but teams scrag and crowd him to death because they know he is our only dangerous forward.

Offline Ekto

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #39 on: May 20, 2012, 01:55:24 PM »
Maybe composed delivery into the forward line is what is needed to hit whichever target is presented at them.

I think we may say the most composed deliverer of the footy into the forward line at Coburg get a run next week.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #40 on: May 20, 2012, 02:02:29 PM »
So why dont we play Jack one out in the square isolated with his player?.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #41 on: May 20, 2012, 02:47:47 PM »
mine are
out 
 grimes, jackson, king,nahas.
in
post for grimes,
darrou yes darrou we need a third tall defensive option and hes been going alright at coburg. has genuine size at 190/97 we cant keep on risking our structure we need to play with the structure that is likely to take us forward.
derickx the second ruck/third tall forward option that we have to have. we must give maric a hand and im not inclined to just bring vickery straight back in coming off such woeful form and injury.in for jackson who is not the way forward and continues to be very ordinary.
arnot for king who lets face it continues to be very ordinary time to give this kid a game.

grimes apart who is injured, the other three have been mainly in our bottom 6 all season and imo are a reason why we cant get over the line.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38996
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #42 on: May 20, 2012, 05:18:17 PM »
Our entire forward line with the exception of Edwards were poor. If you are going drop Miller then you drop Jack. Miller was poor, Jack was pathetic. Why he persists with trying to take mark of the year at every contest beggars belief. He should be leading more. Surely it isn't that hard. Play to your strengths for crying out loud

Anyhow

Ins: Vickery, Griffiths at chb, White

Outs: Grimes, King, Jackson
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #43 on: May 20, 2012, 05:20:43 PM »
Our entire forward line with the exception of Edwards were poor. If you are going drop Miller then you drop Jack. Miller was poor, Jack was pathetic. Why he persists with trying to take mark of the year at every contest beggars belief. He should be leading more. Surely it isn't that hard. Play to your strengths for crying out loud

Anyhow

Ins: Vickery, Griffiths at chb, White

Outs: Grimes, King, Jackson

Would have Nahas out before Jackson.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Changes next week for the Hawks game?
« Reply #44 on: May 20, 2012, 07:16:34 PM »
If you are going drop Miller then you drop Jack. Miller was poor, Jack was pathetic.

Outs: Grimes, King, Jackson

Please outline your thought process behind this comment.


Its a good idea to drop both key tall forwards this week?
« Last Edit: May 20, 2012, 07:31:53 PM by Bentleigh-esque »