Author Topic: Ruckman Needed / Cam Wood and Orren Stephenson training with Richmond  (Read 27067 times)

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #105 on: October 15, 2012, 03:34:53 PM »
I think we should just bring in a big, competitive state-leauger who can come in should Ivan go down.

Like Derrickx?

Derickx is definitely the right type to go for.

Is he a complete write off yet BTW? No convinced he is.

He has been considered to have been one of Coburg's best players once or twice in 2 years. For a 25 year old on an AFL list that is just not good enough. He doesn't do enough at VFL level for me to believe he could be a decent option in the AFL. The club gave him a few games and he averaged maybe 5 touches. I think there's a chance he could get the arse in a few weeks

Agree, but I think he is the type we need to go for. He could have gone the other way and been a handy pick-up for us. Still a slim chance to do so. He has some tools to work with.

Having two monster Rucks on the park is not viable anymore, unless they are both ultra mobile (Cox and Panther). We couldn't fit Hmac in the best 22. He would only be a replacement for Maric and I this would be attractive to him. Too bad the Mullet is flippin awesome. Hmac has a better chance of being top-dawg at Geetroit. 

I reckon the club has an eye on a state-leaguer and will take him late in the ND.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #106 on: October 15, 2012, 03:43:44 PM »
I think we should just bring in a big, competitive state-leauger who can come in should Ivan go down.

Like Derrickx?

Derickx is definitely the right type to go for.

Is he a complete write off yet BTW? No convinced he is.

He has been considered to have been one of Coburg's best players once or twice in 2 years. For a 25 year old on an AFL list that is just not good enough. He doesn't do enough at VFL level for me to believe he could be a decent option in the AFL. The club gave him a few games and he averaged maybe 5 touches. I think there's a chance he could get the arse in a few weeks

Agree, but I think he is the type we need to go for. He could have gone the other way and been a handy pick-up for us. Still a slim chance to do so. He has some tools to work with.

Having two monster Rucks on the park is not viable anymore, unless they are both ultra mobile (Cox and Panther). We couldn't fit Hmac in the best 22. He would only be a replacement for Maric and I this would be attractive to him. Too bad the Mullet is flippin awesome. Hmac has a better chance of being top-dawg at Geetroit. 

I reckon the club has an eye on a state-leaguer and will take him late in the ND.
yet sydney play both pyke and mumford.adelaide played a fair bit both jacobs and jenkins.  reckon carlton will play both kruezer and warnock. freo at one stage played all sandilands clarke and griffen.
essendon have played both hille and bellchambers with ryder.
i dunno if i buy into this two rucks on the park is not viable stuff.

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #107 on: October 15, 2012, 03:49:59 PM »
I think we should just bring in a big, competitive state-leauger who can come in should Ivan go down.

Like Derrickx?

Derickx is definitely the right type to go for.

Is he a complete write off yet BTW? No convinced he is.

He has been considered to have been one of Coburg's best players once or twice in 2 years. For a 25 year old on an AFL list that is just not good enough. He doesn't do enough at VFL level for me to believe he could be a decent option in the AFL. The club gave him a few games and he averaged maybe 5 touches. I think there's a chance he could get the arse in a few weeks

Agree, but I think he is the type we need to go for. He could have gone the other way and been a handy pick-up for us. Still a slim chance to do so. He has some tools to work with.

Having two monster Rucks on the park is not viable anymore, unless they are both ultra mobile (Cox and Panther). We couldn't fit Hmac in the best 22. He would only be a replacement for Maric and I this would be attractive to him. Too bad the Mullet is flippin awesome. Hmac has a better chance of being top-dawg at Geetroit. 

I reckon the club has an eye on a state-leaguer and will take him late in the ND.
yet sydney play both pyke and mumford.adelaide played a fair bit both jacobs and jenkins.  reckon carlton will play both kruezer and warnock. freo at one stage played all sandilands clarke and griffen.
essendon have played both hille and bellchambers with ryder.
i dunno if i buy into this two rucks on the park is not viable stuff.

true, but I think most clubs experienced problems with their balance and ended up dropping one (Hille, Warnock, Clarke). Or one of those players is mobile and played predominantly forward (Jenkins, Ryder). I think one key ruck (Ivan) and one forward/ruck (Vicks) works best for us. I dont think another big ruck like Hmac would work in the same team as Ivan, which is the reason he is on the outer at NM.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #108 on: October 15, 2012, 04:11:40 PM »
the one thing that may be his saving grace is injury. didnt he break his ankle big blokes can take a long time to get over that type of injury even when healed.

Yep. I think he'll get another season to show his worth.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #109 on: October 15, 2012, 04:57:34 PM »
I think we should just bring in a big, competitive state-leauger who can come in should Ivan go down.

Like Derrickx?

Derickx is definitely the right type to go for.

Is he a complete write off yet BTW? No convinced he is.

He has been considered to have been one of Coburg's best players once or twice in 2 years. For a 25 year old on an AFL list that is just not good enough. He doesn't do enough at VFL level for me to believe he could be a decent option in the AFL. The club gave him a few games and he averaged maybe 5 touches. I think there's a chance he could get the arse in a few weeks

Agree, but I think he is the type we need to go for. He could have gone the other way and been a handy pick-up for us. Still a slim chance to do so. He has some tools to work with.

Having two monster Rucks on the park is not viable anymore, unless they are both ultra mobile (Cox and Panther). We couldn't fit Hmac in the best 22. He would only be a replacement for Maric and I this would be attractive to him. Too bad the Mullet is flippin awesome. Hmac has a better chance of being top-dawg at Geetroit. 

I reckon the club has an eye on a state-leaguer and will take him late in the ND.
yet sydney play both pyke and mumford.adelaide played a fair bit both jacobs and jenkins.  reckon carlton will play both kruezer and warnock. freo at one stage played all sandilands clarke and griffen.
essendon have played both hille and bellchambers with ryder.
i dunno if i buy into this two rucks on the park is not viable stuff.

true, but I think most clubs experienced problems with their balance and ended up dropping one (Hille, Warnock, Clarke). Or one of those players is mobile and played predominantly forward (Jenkins, Ryder). I think one key ruck (Ivan) and one forward/ruck (Vicks) works best for us. I dont think another big ruck like Hmac would work in the same team as Ivan, which is the reason he is on the outer at NM.
i suppose it all comes down to team chemistry and what you prefer.
me i prefer both ruckmen to be primarily combative ruckmen where they dont just compete the ruck knock but become big battering rams and almost inside mids when the ball hits the ground.
good if one if not both can take a mark and go forward. ben hudson is one of those spare inside mid battering rams. ottens was as well kruezer is  and i reckon ivan is as well.
our troubles  are three fold.   when ivan goes for a break it falls away terribly.  we run the risk of working ivan into the ground if we dont give him decent breaks. and we need to play a genuine backup in case ivan is hurt.

others prefer one crash bash ruckman and a forward who can give a chop out  ie jolley and brown at collingwood or hale and roughhead at hawrthorn. our option here is vickery who imo is very much a forward first and ruckman second. atm my problem with this is vickery just doesnt compete and looks out of place in the ruck.


if vickery can become a more than competent ruckman we would not have to worry but hes miles away and is a real liability when in the ruck.

getting mcintyre  would mean vickerys spot in not an automatic gimme and i dont think that a bad thing. if it means two competetive proven  ruckmen and vickery is in a bun fight for the second key forward spot with elton astbury and griffiths bloody great.

as i said it all comes down to the team chemistry and what you prefer. i see plenty of examples of clubs playing 2 genuine ruckmen

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #110 on: October 15, 2012, 05:22:00 PM »
Yep. Its certainly not an exact science. I do agree that competition for spots is a good thing. We really need Vickery to stand up this year and I think he can. Still has plenty of development in him.
Does anyone know how competent Ivan was when he was Vickery's age? Might be an interesting insight.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #111 on: October 15, 2012, 07:02:25 PM »

yet sydney play both pyke and mumford.adelaide played a fair bit both jacobs and jenkins.  reckon carlton will play both kruezer and warnock. freo at one stage played all sandilands clarke and griffen.
essendon have played both hille and bellchambers with ryder.
i dunno if i buy into this two rucks on the park is not viable stuff.

You've never spoken truer words Claw.  I don't buy into it either - I reckon the clubs playing 1 and a part-timer are giving their opposition a walk-up start.   :thumbsup

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #112 on: October 16, 2012, 01:13:06 AM »
read this one on bf.
seems adelaide are interested in angus. seeing the club has said they arent really interested in trading for players but will be looking for pick upgrades what do people think of angus plus pick 50 to adelaide for their pick 40.

like one bf poster said i reckon it will get real interesting next week when all the picks are sorted and in order.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #113 on: October 16, 2012, 07:52:34 AM »
read this one on bf.
seems adelaide are interested in angus. seeing the club has said they arent really interested in trading for players but will be looking for pick upgrades what do people think of angus plus pick 50 to adelaide for their pick 40.

like one bf poster said i reckon it will get real interesting next week when all the picks are sorted and in order.

About right. Be great to get another selection inside 40.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #114 on: October 16, 2012, 09:24:49 AM »
read this one on bf.
seems adelaide are interested in angus. seeing the club has said they arent really interested in trading for players but will be looking for pick upgrades what do people think of angus plus pick 50 to adelaide for their pick 40.

like one bf poster said i reckon it will get real interesting next week when all the picks are sorted and in order.

 :thumbsup

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #115 on: October 16, 2012, 01:07:27 PM »
Giles had already been on an AFL list and a lot of people thought he was stiff to get delisted. I don't have a problem with giving a state league player a shot as long as they're dominating their comp. Right now it looks like people want to recruit blokes who couldn't even carry Graham's bag let alone be back up to Maric.

How many #1 ruckman in the comp that weren't drafted as a kid?

Cox, Mumford, Hudson, Jolly, Sandilands, Stephenson (If you think his #1)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #116 on: October 16, 2012, 01:15:09 PM »
Jolly drafted at 19 years old,ditto Cox & Sandi. The others all drafted in early 20's apart from Stephenson who is probably 3rd in line at best for Geelong.

Not saying you can't draft a good ruckman from state leagues but most of them are playing at that level for a reason

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #117 on: October 16, 2012, 01:39:37 PM »
Jolly drafted at 19 years old,ditto Cox & Sandi. The others all drafted in early 20's apart from Stephenson who is probably 3rd in line at best for Geelong.

Not saying you can't draft a good ruckman from state leagues but most of them are playing at that level for a reason

You're right, I just went by how old they would turn the year they were drafted.
I agree, and notice how all of them are older ruckmen, now-a-days with how much efforts put into drafting good ruckmen are getting picked up at younger ages.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #118 on: October 16, 2012, 02:27:24 PM »
Claw kruser is like a mid and is #1 draft pick. So the Carlton example is outside the general rule.

When we played adelaide from memory jacobs rucked entire game v maric.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Ruckman Needed
« Reply #119 on: October 16, 2012, 08:17:13 PM »
Yep. Its certainly not an exact science. I do agree that competition for spots is a good thing. We really need Vickery to stand up this year and I think he can. Still has plenty of development in him.
Does anyone know how competent Ivan was when he was Vickery's age? Might be an interesting insight.
was drafted 04 along with john meeson. managed 14 games in his first three  seasons.
  0 in 05, 8 in 06 and 6 in 07.
 ivan was in competition with biglands hudson  clarke   griffen  and meeson at various  stages. thats some ruck depth hey.is there a lesson for us here.
pretty sure biglands did his knee in the 06 finals. he then did his knee again if i remember correct in 07.  he stayed on their list for a few more yrs but did not play another game. they traded clarke at the end of 06 to stkilda ?. and hudson went to the dogs at the end of 07.

suddenly there was a spot to be had. maric played 16 games in 08 griffen managed 12  moran who the crows had just traded for played 7 and they had tippett who played 19 games and gave the ruckmen a chop out.   his 08 was very servicable as far as playing in the ruck went i suppose you could say the load was pretty well shared.

09 he played 20 games and become the clear #1 ruckman. again had a decent yr as a ruckman very competetive  but nothing world beating.
griffen had a poor yr and managed just 2 games but ivan had plenty of help from tippett who had a standout yr both as a forward and back up ruckman. moran did his knee rnd 12 after looking good early in the season. sellar also pinch hit in the ruck.

10 ivan again lead there ruck. again  servicable without being outstanding tended to go missing for chunks of games. was backed up by griffin and tippett again.
 think meeson was delisted or traded .also at the end of this yr griffen went home and moran was having serious injury issues still. so they went and got jacobs.

11 jacobs had a very good  yr surpassing anything that ivan had done to date. the crows decided to go with jacobs and tippett as backup and didnt see the need to play ivan he had effectively been surpassed. played just 6 games and was traded to us at the end of the yr.

looking back you could say ivan was tracking along okay with incremental improvement each yr until 2011 when he was overlooked for a significantly higher performer.

just my opinion but as a ruckman id place maric a long way in front of vickery at the same stage of their careers. always a competetor and physically a mile in front of vickery.always gave a contest at the least when rucking.

vickery has it over ivan in other ways but apart from a very good goal haul last yr vickery has not performed to the same level as ivan.
until this yr vickery was a bit like ivan in that he was tracking in the right direction each yr. he obviously is too young  and physically lacking to play with injury so he has a decent reason for not continuing to track in the right direction.

not much info there that you and everyone else probably didnt already know but theres an indicator of what ivan has done and ythe competition he had for a game. imo ivan in yrs 4 5 and 6 was pretty decent.poor in yr 7 and outstanding in yr 8.

the one thing that stands out in this is just how hard it is to get good ruckmen just look at the work the crows have put in to get good ones.
ive alwys advocated 4 or 5 on your list at varying stages of development you also need to vary the type of ruckman on your list.

we have a good ruckman in ivan. we need another mature ruckman who can compete and do a job at afl standard. gus should be this ruckman but hes not good enough. we need a quality young ruckman as a key component of any succesion plan we have. we need him in our system as soon as possible. and it would not hurt us to have a rookie ruckman or even  couple of different types on the rookie list.