What's our best 22 now?

[Chuck17]

Petterd is not in our best 22. He's depth and will have to do a lot to even be considered best 22 this year.
Here's my 22

FB Ellis Rance Houli
HB Grimes Chaplin Morris
C Edwards Cotchin Conca
HF King Vickery Newman
FF Nahas Reiwoldt Griffiths
FOLL Maric Martin Deledio
INT Foley Vlastuin Tuck Grigg
EMER Batchelor Astbury Jackson Ohanlon

Petterd seems to be a much better player than Morris IMHO.

Worst thing you have ever said

I thought he was trolling

[yellowandback]

I wonder how many that had chris knights in their best 22 would still have him in now.

...... What about it?

Edited for accuracy

[Tigeritis™©®]

I wonder how many that had chris knights in their best 22 would still have him in now.

...... What about it?

Edited for accuracy

We'll see Y&B......we'll see.

[gerkin greg]

Based on pre-season form and injuries

B: Morris Rance Griffiths
HB: Houli Chaplin Ellis
C: Newman Deledio Grigg
R: Maric Cotchin Tuck
HF: Conca Martin Jackson
F: S.Edwards Riewoldt Vickery
Int: Vlastuin King Petterd White

Emg: Arnot, McGuane, Nahas

Foley and Grimes would be in that 22 if not injured.
Batchelor and Knights have had poor pre-seasons IMO, Knights probably underdone.

[Smokey]

It's a fair stab Gerks and a half decent side.  One question - can we elevate Petterd off the rookie list straight up?

[gerkin greg]

It's a fair stab Gerks and a half decent side.  One question - can we elevate Petterd off the rookie list straight up?

Yeah I think we can re: Terd

If it's a half decent side, name the half that aren't decent 

Still a few quality senior players off the top sides for mine and rely on too many kids whilst still carrying a couple of hacks

[Tigeritis™©®]

Based on pre-season form and injuries

B: Morris Rance Griffiths
HB: Houli Chaplin Ellis
C: Newman Deledio Grigg
R: Maric Cotchin Tuck
HF: Conca Martin Jackson
F: S.Edwards Riewoldt Vickery
Int: Vlastuin King Petterd White

Emg: Arnot, McGuane, Dea

Foley and Grimes would be in that 22 if not injured.
Batchelor and Knights have had poor pre-seasons IMO, Knights probably underdone.

Martin at CHF?  Interesting
What's your reasoning enlightened one?

[gerkin greg]

Martin at CHF?  Interesting
What's your reasoning enlightened one?

Means we get to play with one less hack was at the forefront of the thought

Gives us an extra midfielder and he'd probably be a gun at it, at worst better than most of our options

All based on current form/injuries mind you

[Tigeritis™©®]

Martin at CHF?  Interesting
What's your reasoning enlightened one?

Means we get to play with one less hack was at the forefront of the thought

Gives us an extra midfielder and he'd probably be a gun at it, at worst better than most of our options

All based on current form/injuries mind you

But will we beat the scum?
I still reckon we just plop Griff there for the season. A high CHF to open up the forward 50.
If Grimey is back where do you put Griffiths?

[Gigantor]

Awhile back Royce hart suggested that Dusty would be the ideal CHF

[gerkin greg]

Martin at CHF?  Interesting
What's your reasoning enlightened one?

Means we get to play with one less hack was at the forefront of the thought

Gives us an extra midfielder and he'd probably be a gun at it, at worst better than most of our options

All based on current form/injuries mind you

But will we beat the scum?
I still reckon we just plop Griff there for the season. A high CHF to open up the forward 50.
If Grimey is back where do you put Griffiths?

If Grimey is back he takes Ellis' spot, Ellis goes to the bench, and either White or Petterd eat burgers

Just get the best 22 players out there

Work out positions and match-ups during the week.

Punters put too much emphasis on naming a side to look like how it has been formatted in the paper for the last 100 years. We all do it. But it's a bit outdated IMO.

Awhile back Royce hart suggested that Dusty would be the ideal CHF

He looks like one. And who are we to disagree with Royce?

[Tazzytiger]

Royce would know

[Tigeritis™©®]

Martin at CHF?  Interesting
What's your reasoning enlightened one?

Means we get to play with one less hack was at the forefront of the thought

Gives us an extra midfielder and he'd probably be a gun at it, at worst better than most of our options

All based on current form/injuries mind you

But will we beat the scum?
I still reckon we just plop Griff there for the season. A high CHF to open up the forward 50.
If Grimey is back where do you put Griffiths?

If Grimey is back he takes Ellis' spot, Ellis goes to the bench, and either White or Petterd eat burgers

Just get the best 22 players out there

Work out positions and match-ups during the week.

Punters put too much emphasis on naming a side to look like how it has been formatted in the paper for the last 100 years. We all do it. But it's a bit outdated IMO.

Awhile back Royce hart suggested that Dusty would be the ideal CHF

He looks like one. And who are we to disagree with Royce?

You still haven't told me where you'd rather play Griff. You had him in the back 6 but if Grimey canes back where do you put Griff against the scum?
I'm talking round 1 here and we MUST beat the cheats.
Tell us Obe one. Your our only hope.

[gerkin greg]

Grimes wont play round 1 

[Tigeritis™©®]

Grimes wont play round 1 

Oh yes  your right. My mistake.

Do then you prefer griff down back or up forward?