Author Topic: Anthony Miles [merged]  (Read 161110 times)

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #165 on: April 21, 2014, 04:11:46 PM »
At this very moment Grigg
And that's why we are a " middle of the road " team
Grigg last game has saved him being dropped .at least for another week
I ask this question, we promote Lloyd and not Miles
Why ?
Lloyd as some size about him .Miles doesn't



Lloyd was drafted, no need for him to get promoted.

Sorry I meant to say we drafted Lloyd and Rookied Miles
I wonder why we do that
Probably because we rated Lloyd more but what has that got to do with it? It doesn't mean we didn't rate Miles.
I'd be happy if you said, I don't think he is this or that but what you are saying is just because the Tigers didn't draft him and only rookied him, he is no good. Or even worse, he is a lightly framed player.
Anyway each to their own.  :thumbsup

Miles too small is my opinion

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #166 on: April 21, 2014, 04:14:20 PM »
Jack unlike those giants Barry cable,george Bisset,bobby skilton etc

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #167 on: April 21, 2014, 04:16:47 PM »
We did pick the kid, big tone, in the rookie draft when every other club had multiple chances to so before we did. We have promoted a tall to cover an injury to another tall. If Foley or someone similar went down, then maybe miles would have been promoted.
My point is Go Richo 12, that clubs don't always get it right. Every year players from state leagues come in after being missed in ALL drafts.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #168 on: April 21, 2014, 04:24:54 PM »
Jack unlike those giants Barry cable,george Bisset,bobby skilton etc

No bench
Few rotations
Slower game
Less emphasise on athletic abilities

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #169 on: April 21, 2014, 04:27:29 PM »
Jack unlike those giants Barry cable,george Bisset,bobby skilton etc

Oh dear

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #170 on: April 21, 2014, 04:28:07 PM »
I agree with you too on that one, it's just that some posters have made the decision not to promote him to be a massive mistake and an illustration of our poor list management.I am not convinced it is especially when 17 other clubs have deemed him to be not worthy of a place on their list.
I hope they are wrong, and in time it may be proven they were.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #171 on: April 21, 2014, 04:30:07 PM »
His career is over before it started now that he's learning to be mediocre and less passionate about his footy.
He'd be better off at another club if he wants to have a successful career in footy.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #172 on: April 21, 2014, 04:31:22 PM »
Emo

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #173 on: April 21, 2014, 04:32:49 PM »
I can't understand how Thomas got promoted instead of Miles.Dont come and tell me Miles is not better then Thomas.There is no room in our first 22 for both Thomas and Jackson we go in so unbalanced it's Jackson for me that's it.How can the match committee not see this !.

Guys you play players on form even if the bloke coming out of the side is more skillfull or else your sending the wrong message.


Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #174 on: April 21, 2014, 04:36:03 PM »


My mail out of Albury is that there were probably 10 better players playing up there that should of got drafted before


All that says to me is that there must be at least 11 players in Albury better than Matt Thomas.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #175 on: April 21, 2014, 04:42:31 PM »
From what I have seen of both players, I would prefer Miles on our list than McDonough.
Forget about who missed drafting who or what someone's under 10's coach said.....
Who would you prefer?
Who has the biggest possible upside?
What sort of player do we need now and long term?

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #176 on: April 21, 2014, 04:57:09 PM »
At this very moment Grigg
And that's why we are a " middle of the road " team
Grigg last game has saved him being dropped .at least for another week
I ask this question, we promote Lloyd and not Miles
Why ?
Lloyd as some size about him .Miles doesn't



Lloyd was drafted, no need for him to get promoted.

Sorry I meant to say we drafted Lloyd and Rookied Miles
I wonder why we do that
Probably because we rated Lloyd more but what has that got to do with it? It doesn't mean we didn't rate Miles.
I'd be happy if you said, I don't think he is this or that but what you are saying is just because the Tigers didn't draft him and only rookied him, he is no good. Or even worse, he is a lightly framed player.
Anyway each to their own.  :thumbsup

Miles too small is my opinion

He's 179cms and 78kg hardly small and plenty in senior sides at afl clubs of a similar size and shape.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40319
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #177 on: April 21, 2014, 06:23:30 PM »
At this very moment Grigg
And that's why we are a " middle of the road " team
Grigg last game has saved him being dropped .at least for another week
I ask this question, we promote Lloyd and not Miles
Why ?
Lloyd as some size about him .Miles doesn't



Lloyd was drafted, no need for him to get promoted.

Sorry I meant to say we drafted Lloyd and Rookied Miles
I wonder why we do that
Probably because we rated Lloyd more but what has that got to do with it? It doesn't mean we didn't rate Miles.
I'd be happy if you said, I don't think he is this or that but what you are saying is just because the Tigers didn't draft him and only rookied him, he is no good. Or even worse, he is a lightly framed player.
Anyway each to their own.  :thumbsup

Miles too small is my opinion

He's 179cms and 78kg hardly small and plenty in senior sides at afl clubs of a similar size and shape.

At 179cm he is taller than Jake King and Nathan Foley. And just a couple of centimetres shorter than Newman, McDonough, Lloyd, Arnott, Ellis. Throw in the fact he is only a couple Kgs lighter than Newman, King, Banfield, Conca don't think the argument that he is too small cuts it.

Have to say I'd have Miles on our list ahead a couple of others and I am not talking about the usual suspects either  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #178 on: April 21, 2014, 06:34:20 PM »
There is a reason that Miles is a rookie you know
Is it the same reason Stephen Milne was a rookie or is it the same reason Dean Cox was a rookie or is it the same reason Matthew Boyd was a rookie?
Jack, the kid was on a list of basically all top 10 draft picks, and they have to delist people every year as the rules state. The point is they have to let some go.
Now us not putting him on our list is another RFC f#%k up IMO. Just because we didn't doesn't make it right, our ability to pick kids is putrid.
And you wanting Grigg in the side instead of a kid that has done everything possible this year is staggering! Or are you just taking your mail as gospel?

spot on BT

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Rookie pick 27 - Anthony Miles
« Reply #179 on: April 21, 2014, 06:49:41 PM »
At this very moment Grigg
And that's why we are a " middle of the road " team
Grigg last game has saved him being dropped .at least for another week
I ask this question, we promote Lloyd and not Miles
Why ?
Lloyd as some size about him .Miles doesn't



Lloyd was drafted, no need for him to get promoted.

Sorry I meant to say we drafted Lloyd and Rookied Miles
I wonder why we do that
Probably because we rated Lloyd more but what has that got to do with it? It doesn't mean we didn't rate Miles.
I'd be happy if you said, I don't think he is this or that but what you are saying is just because the Tigers didn't draft him and only rookied him, he is no good. Or even worse, he is a lightly framed player.
Anyway each to their own.  :thumbsup

Miles too small is my opinion

He's 179cms and 78kg hardly small and plenty in senior sides at afl clubs of a similar size and shape.

Agreed. Almost midget like
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH