Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
He'll be our best pick up ever
How sweet it would be to have another pick around 20. Of course peoples opinions might be different but we could of gone Duggan at 12 who I believe is a surer thing and then with 20ish taken Cockatoo or Langford or Garlett at pick 20ish, as it's likely all 3 could slip down that far.
Would people like a Bontempelli type? If the answer is yes then Kyle Langford is our man. (and yes I know he's mainly listed as a forward but he's essentially a tall -190cm- marking mid who can play forward.) Has also been compared by some to Richo.....I'd say a smaller version of 2008 Richo than, say, 1996 or 2001 Richo.
Quote from: Diocletian on October 20, 2014, 04:07:24 PMWould people like a Bontempelli type? If the answer is yes then Kyle Langford is our man. (and yes I know he's mainly listed as a forward but he's essentially a tall -190cm- marking mid who can play forward.) Has also been compared by some to Richo.....I'd say a smaller version of 2008 Richo than, say, 1996 or 2001 Richo.Very astute point tm! depends on whether he is a richo/bontempelli or a Cale Morton..
Quote from: Yeahright on October 20, 2014, 07:33:08 PMHow sweet it would be to have another pick around 20. Of course peoples opinions might be different but we could of gone Duggan at 12 who I believe is a surer thing and then with 20ish taken Cockatoo or Langford or Garlett at pick 20ish, as it's likely all 3 could slip down that far.Its bewildering they didnt get another 15-30 pickStanley=#21
Quote from: Diocletian on October 20, 2014, 04:07:24 PMWould people like a Bontempelli type? If the answer is yes then Kyle Langford is our man. (and yes I know he's mainly listed as a forward but he's essentially a tall -190cm- marking mid who can play forward.) Has also been compared by some to Richo.....I'd say a smaller version of 2008 Richo than, say, 1996 or 2001 Richo.depends on whether he is a richo/bontempelli or a Cale Morton..
yet stanley has been a better player imo.
Quote from: Judge Roughneck on October 20, 2014, 07:38:24 PMQuote from: Yeahright on October 20, 2014, 07:33:08 PMHow sweet it would be to have another pick around 20. Of course peoples opinions might be different but we could of gone Duggan at 12 who I believe is a surer thing and then with 20ish taken Cockatoo or Langford or Garlett at pick 20ish, as it's likely all 3 could slip down that far.Its bewildering they didnt get another 15-30 pickStanley=#21lol more over rating of our players. your obviously talking about vickery and stanley in the same breath. yet stanley has been a better player imo.
Quote from: the claw on October 20, 2014, 08:37:00 PMQuote from: Judge Roughneck on October 20, 2014, 07:38:24 PMQuote from: Yeahright on October 20, 2014, 07:33:08 PMHow sweet it would be to have another pick around 20. Of course peoples opinions might be different but we could of gone Duggan at 12 who I believe is a surer thing and then with 20ish taken Cockatoo or Langford or Garlett at pick 20ish, as it's likely all 3 could slip down that far.Its bewildering they didnt get another 15-30 pickStanley=#21lol more over rating of our players. your obviously talking about vickery and stanley in the same breath. yet stanley has been a better player imo.Might've been talking about Conca for all we know, claw. Either way, regardless of what you, I or Judge thinks, in the current climate I'd say Vickery would've likely got us a similar pick to Stanley. Clubs want talls, they want rucks too and many probably still see him as one even if our club no longer does, he was a first round pick and he was still hitting the scoreboard -23 goals in 12 games- even if most of them were cheapies. Very much a sellers market atm when it comes to his type.
