Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: Knighter on October 18, 2016, 10:41:27 PMQuote from: WilliamPowell on October 18, 2016, 08:50:52 PMQuote from: Harry on October 18, 2016, 08:21:07 PMPeople aren't happy with our deals because they suck.So you think Lids (who wants to go) and a straight swap for Caddy isn't a good deal for us?or would you rather the club cave into geelong's demand of Lids + pick 27 for Caddy and say that's a better deal?Or perhaps you want them to do a Hawthorn'esq deal for Lids? Pick 50 odd?Caddy for Lids is a win for us.Nothing wrong with that deal it doesn't suck.Simple facts are (1) if Geelong want him it's on our terms not their's. If they wont' accept a fair a reasonable trade then Lids comes back, re stocks his locker and we move onAnd (2) we can throw up the likes of Edwards, Ellis B, Lennon, etc but if no one wants them or they don't agree to a trade then they don't go Geelong not prepared to do that deal is not the Club's faultCaddy is slightly better than Conca. He is slow and lacks endurance. Will be another list clogged in a few years bank on itCaddy is better than that mate. I'd take Caddy over Prestia any day.
Quote from: WilliamPowell on October 18, 2016, 08:50:52 PMQuote from: Harry on October 18, 2016, 08:21:07 PMPeople aren't happy with our deals because they suck.So you think Lids (who wants to go) and a straight swap for Caddy isn't a good deal for us?or would you rather the club cave into geelong's demand of Lids + pick 27 for Caddy and say that's a better deal?Or perhaps you want them to do a Hawthorn'esq deal for Lids? Pick 50 odd?Caddy for Lids is a win for us.Nothing wrong with that deal it doesn't suck.Simple facts are (1) if Geelong want him it's on our terms not their's. If they wont' accept a fair a reasonable trade then Lids comes back, re stocks his locker and we move onAnd (2) we can throw up the likes of Edwards, Ellis B, Lennon, etc but if no one wants them or they don't agree to a trade then they don't go Geelong not prepared to do that deal is not the Club's faultCaddy is slightly better than Conca. He is slow and lacks endurance. Will be another list clogged in a few years bank on it
Quote from: Harry on October 18, 2016, 08:21:07 PMPeople aren't happy with our deals because they suck.So you think Lids (who wants to go) and a straight swap for Caddy isn't a good deal for us?or would you rather the club cave into geelong's demand of Lids + pick 27 for Caddy and say that's a better deal?Or perhaps you want them to do a Hawthorn'esq deal for Lids? Pick 50 odd?Caddy for Lids is a win for us.Nothing wrong with that deal it doesn't suck.Simple facts are (1) if Geelong want him it's on our terms not their's. If they wont' accept a fair a reasonable trade then Lids comes back, re stocks his locker and we move onAnd (2) we can throw up the likes of Edwards, Ellis B, Lennon, etc but if no one wants them or they don't agree to a trade then they don't go Geelong not prepared to do that deal is not the Club's fault
People aren't happy with our deals because they suck.
Who's your Caddy?
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....
Prestia>Caddy>>>>>Conca
Right GWS give us that mid teen pick for lidsCats FO
Quote from: Dookster on October 19, 2016, 08:39:14 AMPrestia>Caddy>>>>>ConcaEFA :And FWIW on Brownlow votes:Prestia - 23 from 95 games @ 0.24/gameCaddy - 8 from 95 games @ 0.09/gameConca - 3 from 80 @ 0.04/gameAll debuted the same year too...
Yep, SEN saying Giants now into Lids.
Quote from: Willy on October 19, 2016, 09:41:51 AMYep, SEN saying Giants now into Lids.What picks do GWS have to offer?