Author Topic: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread / Dusty a Tiger for next 7 years [update]  (Read 187442 times)

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #540 on: August 20, 2017, 09:33:32 PM »
Saving his best Richmond games for last..... :shh
Do you really think he is going?

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #541 on: August 20, 2017, 09:39:27 PM »
I don't. :shh
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #542 on: August 20, 2017, 09:43:53 PM »
Can never tell if Dios being a horrible troll or is just a little.to excited about giving us shyte news....

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9974
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #543 on: August 20, 2017, 11:33:50 PM »
We can always match opposition offers, and I for one would be happy for RFC to match basically anything thrown at Dusty or at least bleed another team dry of talent and picks.

Offline The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3697
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #544 on: August 21, 2017, 07:39:11 AM »
We can always match opposition offers, and I for one would be happy for RFC to match basically anything thrown at Dusty or at least bleed another team dry of talent and picks.


This is what we should do if he leaves. I think he stays.

Offline Slipper

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #545 on: August 21, 2017, 09:22:56 AM »
If we match an offer, at what cost do we draw the line?

If another club offers him $1.5 million per season, do we match that?

Because at that price, he is going to be on close to double what anyone else on out list is getting.

I agree with a number of experts around the place saying that if you want to win a flag, you cannot pay one player so much of your cap.

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #546 on: August 21, 2017, 09:25:51 AM »
If we match an offer, at what cost do we draw the line?

If another club offers him $1.5 million per season, do we match that?

Because at that price, he is going to be on close to double what anyone else on out list is getting.

I agree with a number of experts around the place saying that if you want to win a flag, you cannot pay one player so much of your cap.
Yes but by matching the offer we are merely trying to force a trade that suits as opposed to keeping
him.

Offline 1885

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 110
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #547 on: August 21, 2017, 09:45:45 AM »
If we match an offer, at what cost do we draw the line?

If another club offers him $1.5 million per season, do we match that?

Because at that price, he is going to be on close to double what anyone else on out list is getting.

I agree with a number of experts around the place saying that if you want to win a flag, you cannot pay one player so much of your cap.

How much are we paying: Hampson, Maric, Grigg, Houli, Morris? Fancy losing dusty due to not wanting to paying an extra couple 100k and keeping these muppets around  :rollin

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #548 on: August 21, 2017, 09:48:00 AM »
If we match an offer, at what cost do we draw the line?

If another club offers him $1.5 million per season, do we match that?

Because at that price, he is going to be on close to double what anyone else on out list is getting.

I agree with a number of experts around the place saying that if you want to win a flag, you cannot pay one player so much of your cap.



How much are we paying: Hampson, Maric, Grigg, Houli, Morris? Fancy losing dusty due to not wanting to paying an extra couple 100k and keeping these muppets around  :rollin

Maric's retiring so his wage or lack of it does not come into the equation

Offline 1885

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 110
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #549 on: August 21, 2017, 09:52:13 AM »
If we match an offer, at what cost do we draw the line?

If another club offers him $1.5 million per season, do we match that?

Because at that price, he is going to be on close to double what anyone else on out list is getting.

I agree with a number of experts around the place saying that if you want to win a flag, you cannot pay one player so much of your cap.



How much are we paying: Hampson, Maric, Grigg, Houli, Morris? Fancy losing dusty due to not wanting to paying an extra couple 100k and keeping these muppets around  :rollin

Maric's retiring so his wage or lack of it does not come into the equation

It comes into question because it's more money for the dusty-fund. Assuming he's on more than what a new min wage draftee would be. It would be incredible to divert these types on funds on c graders and not give dusty the big dollars

Yarren and Deledio also come off the books end of this season, I hope. There should be plenty of cap space. There isn't an abundance of great players. Still no finals won since the cold war   :santa

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98244
    • One-Eyed Richmond
GWS optimism on retaining Josh Kelly is bad news for Richmond (Australian)
« Reply #550 on: August 21, 2017, 09:52:34 AM »
GWS optimism on Josh Kelly is bad news for Richmond

Greg Denham
The Australian
21 August 2017


Greater Western Sydney’s increased optimism over the past week that superstar Josh Kelly will stay with them for the next two years spells big problems for Richmond’s bid to retain Brownlow Medal favourite Dustin Martin.

There appears to have been a big turnaround in Martin’s situation, with the Tigers losing the confidence that they had the upper hand in recontracting the free agent.

After beating West Coast at Spotless Stadium on the back of a clear best-on-ground performance from Kelly, GWS coach Leon Cameron reiterated his confidence that the midfielder wanted to stay with the Giants until the end of 2019. Despite the constant distraction of Kelly’s immediate future — with North Melbourne, St Kilda and Carlton all after him — the uncontracted 22-year-old has maintained his focus and has hardly missed a beat this season.

On Saturday the left-footer gathered a club record 43 possessions and eight clearances in the 21-point win. Enormous courage can be added to his CV after being crunched when he collided with West Coast’s Josh Kennedy ­approaching time on in the final quarter.

How did he respond after being bandaged up on the bench? Unbelievably, under pressure, he ­delivered a brilliant right-foot pass to Shane Mumford, who kicked truly for goal, before Kelly booted the final goal of the match himself.

Kelly’s contract status beyond has been a talking point all year, and Cameron said his focus had been undiminished despite the speculation. “He’s had a huge year and that’s why we value him so much,” the coach said. “We understand where he’s at in terms of the contract.

“He’s wanted by us, and I have no doubt he wants to stay at our footy club. On the back of those sorts of performances you understand why other clubs are looking at him because he is a pretty good, god damn player. He wants to win for our footy club and he had a massive game.”

There is no doubt Kelly and the Giants have appreciated the ­return from injury in recent weeks of big-bodied on-ballers Stephen Coniglio and Jacob Hopper.

Importantly for the league’s newest club, it’s thought in Sydney’s west that if Kelly stays, so will his mate Hopper, who is also out of contract and has attracted the most attention from Carlton and Geelong.

But it is the Tigers who are starting to get nervous because North Melbourne are believed to be on the verge of increasing their offer to Martin if they miss luring Kelly — the second of their two-pronged priority recruiting strategy. With both Richmond and North Melbourne already having offered Martin six-year deals of more than $1 million annually, as exclusively reported in The ­Australian in May, the Kangaroos are now preparing to negotiate their deal out to seven years as well as a pay increase to ­almost $1.5m a year.

The Australian believes North Melbourne officials, possibly ­including coach Brad Scott, are preparing as early as this weekend, to fly to New Zealand to speak to Martin’s father Shane.

Martin’s future appears to have changed significantly over the past fortnight, as the Tigers were very confident they had almost closed the deal for Martin to play out his career at Punt Road. Right now, that no longer appears so.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/gws-optimism-on-josh-kelly-is-bad-news-for-richmond/news-story/50a07ef86098311f3588a76f202a0454

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #551 on: August 21, 2017, 10:54:58 AM »
If we match an offer, at what cost do we draw the line?

If another club offers him $1.5 million per season, do we match that?

Because at that price, he is going to be on close to double what anyone else on out list is getting.

I agree with a number of experts around the place saying that if you want to win a flag, you cannot pay one player so much of your cap.
Yes but by matching the offer we are merely trying to force a trade that suits as opposed to keeping
him.

What do you think we would get if we were to force a trade.  Looking at his body language I reckon he is gone. 

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #552 on: August 21, 2017, 11:18:59 AM »
If we match an offer, at what cost do we draw the line?

If another club offers him $1.5 million per season, do we match that?

Because at that price, he is going to be on close to double what anyone else on out list is getting.

I agree with a number of experts around the place saying that if you want to win a flag, you cannot pay one player so much of your cap.
Yes but by matching the offer we are merely trying to force a trade that suits as opposed to keeping
him.

What do you think we would get if we were to force a trade.  Looking at his body language I reckon he is gone.

Cashbolt.

Bookmark it.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98244
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Denham: Dusty’s “dramatic” North swing (SEN)
« Reply #553 on: August 21, 2017, 11:38:32 AM »
Denham: Dusty’s “dramatic” North swing

By SEN
21 August 2017


Greg Denham believes Richmond are losing a grip on in-demand superstar Dustin Martin, as North Melbourne remerge as a prime contender to secure his services.

Denham reported in The Australian today that the Tigers are “losing the confidence that they had the upper hand in recontracting the free agent [Martin].” With Josh Kelly showing more interest to remain a GWS Giant, Denham is reporting North’s offer is gaining urgency, as "North Melbourne officials, possibly, including coach Brad Scott, are preparing as early as this weekend, to fly to New Zealand to speak to Martin’s father Shane."

Speaking on SEN’s Hungry For Sport, Denham reiterated his report.

“There was a big dramatic change from Richmond swinging back to North in the last week,” he said.

“Something really significant has happened over the last week or two. I think Richmond was feeling quite confident that they had the deal done. All of a sudden, off the table, I’m not sure whether North got wind of what is now coming through GWS where Josh Kelly, after what Leon Cameron said, must be giving an indication to the Giants that he will stay for the next two years and not leave.

“To be honest, North are so desperate, they were after both players, but they need a least one to rejuvenate and they’re obviously going to put all their eggs in the Martin basket. It seems to be whatever it takes.

“At the start of the year, we had Martin around a four-year deal at about $850,000 to stay at Richmond. The four-years has now gone to six or seven, the 850 has gone to $1.2-1.5 million, which will make Dusty the highest paid player in the AFL.

“You can just see North’s bid is absolutely massive and they’re leaving no stone unturned. Whether they go to New Zealand, the money, the length of contract, they’re leaving nothing to chance.”

Tigers’ legend Kevin Bartlett believes his former club needs to take advantage of Martin’s talent while they have it, stating “Richmond fans will be devastated if Martin packs his bags, the only thing that could sooth the heartache would be if he leaves as a premiership player.”

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2017/08/21/denham-dusty-s-dramatic-north-swing/

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Dustin Martin's contract talk thread [merged]
« Reply #554 on: August 21, 2017, 11:44:58 AM »
not looking good. Gee if you cant keep a talent like that from going to nought, what hope do you have of gaining the services of a lever.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.