Author Topic: State of Umpiring [merged]  (Read 362819 times)

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Umpiring 2014
« Reply #540 on: May 05, 2014, 06:45:08 PM »
thing that's always shitted me to tears with the umps is the extra  leeway they give to the bigger names in the game. For example, when Bartel shoved Rance to the ground after his clumsy tackle on Selwood,  as he was getting up to stand the mark. If that was one of the young blokes or an average run of the mill type, that would have been reversed 100% of the time

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Umpiring 2014
« Reply #541 on: May 05, 2014, 06:52:52 PM »
That's right.

Some blokes can get away with more.

Typical dumb stuff mentality of the whole poo fight
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Umpiring 2014
« Reply #542 on: May 05, 2014, 07:35:33 PM »
The decision against rance on Hawkins was a bloody disgrace , was a textbook spoil, and against cotch taking the knees out, he was already on the bleedin ground the silly idiot  :banghead
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Umpiring 2014
« Reply #543 on: May 05, 2014, 07:43:25 PM »
The decision against rance on Hawkins was a bloody disgrace , was a textbook spoil, and against cotch taking the knees out, he was already on the bleedin ground the silly idiot  :banghead

The Rance vs Hawkins decision was the worst ive seen in a long long time.
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Umpiring 2014
« Reply #544 on: May 05, 2014, 09:29:24 PM »
the greatest indictment on how the umps treat players differently could be seen when the umpire went to selwood and pointed out the blood on his forehead, selwood made a token effort to wipe it, but all that did was smudge it, but still allow him to stay on.

simply amazing.
the selwoods must swallow, for sure

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Umpiring 2014
« Reply #545 on: May 06, 2014, 09:14:36 AM »
the greatest indictment on how the umps treat players differently could be seen when the umpire went to selwood and pointed out the blood on his forehead, selwood made a token effort to wipe it, but all that did was smudge it, but still allow him to stay on.

simply amazing.
the selwoods must swallow, for sure

And then the flogs in the media saying how RFC players made a fundamenetal error in not having him taken off.

After he was already inspected by the umpire, FFS we have been getting it raw from them over the years and now have to do their stuffing job

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #546 on: June 11, 2014, 09:09:42 AM »
Its been pretty funny for a few years now but the norr game was a new low ...

The gerkin couldn't even pretend he could bounce the ball

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #547 on: June 11, 2014, 09:39:51 AM »
Really hope our guys have revisited the holding the ball rule this week. I think against North it was the most times I can remember one team pinged continually for holding the ball, I think we only caught them once. Either we are doing something horribly wrong or our interpretation is way different to the umpires. From what I could see some looked almost identical where we were pinged and North were not, very frustrating for the players and supporters.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #548 on: June 11, 2014, 09:43:47 AM »
Malthouse at least complains about the umpiring. What about Dimwit
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #549 on: June 11, 2014, 09:49:58 AM »
Really hope our guys have revisited the holding the ball rule this week. I think against North it was the most times I can remember one team pinged continually for holding the ball, I think we only caught them once. Either we are doing something horribly wrong or our interpretation is way different to the umpires. From what I could see some looked almost identical where we were pinged and North were not, very frustrating for the players and supporters.

Worst umpiring I've seen in many a year. We were simply robbed. There was one rule for Norf and another for Richmond when it came to holding the ball.
 We would get tackled and dragged to the ground and the umps would just wait and wait and wait and then ping us for holding the ball yet when we tackled Norf the ump wouldn't wait at all ! He would immediately blow the whistle and call ' held to him , no prior opportunity '
That was a disgrace !
Also 51 free kicks paid in our game yet only 18 paid in the Coll V Melb game ?  How can that be possible ? It's the same rules in both games isn't it ?
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #550 on: June 11, 2014, 09:57:09 AM »
Have been ok with the way the umpiring has been this year.
Have liked the way the game has been allowed to flow.
The umpiring is the least of our problems.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #551 on: June 11, 2014, 10:24:35 AM »
Couldn't give a stuffing poo about the umpiring, it has absolutely nothing to do with our crap play.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #552 on: June 11, 2014, 10:28:54 AM »
Have been ok with the way the umpiring has been this year.
Have liked the way the game has been allowed to flow.
The umpiring is the least of our problems.

So I'll ask you then , how can there be 51 free kicks paid in Sunday night's game and then only 18 paid in a game the following day ?  We are playing the same game. AFL football.
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #553 on: June 11, 2014, 10:31:15 AM »
I get what your saying. But when football is generally ugly boring and low scoring - an umpire decision to remove and goal which results in a goal the other end - in a game where one side only scores three goals has a significant impact... To use the queens bday game as an example.

In regards to richmond. When we are on a 3/4/5/6 goal momentum raping. And the umps start pulling out strange free kicks / non free kicks / 50s, it might not be the reason for our crap but it does not help

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: general state of umpiring - richmond 2014
« Reply #554 on: June 11, 2014, 10:32:34 AM »
Have been ok with the way the umpiring has been this year.
Have liked the way the game has been allowed to flow.
The umpiring is the least of our problems.

I can see your point too

But they cannot pretend the rules off the game don't exist (ie. correct disposal) for free flowing reasoning