Thanks for making my point clearer. Contracts dont mean jack. If they want to be broken they would be.
Lets be honest you have no idea who is on a contract, and i very much doubt Teague is on a contract that extends beyond this year. He isnt leppa or mcqualter and has proven sfa as an assistant and coach.
I dont remember Yze ever mentioning most are on contracts, but i may have missed it. Seems very strange a new coach would publicly state coaches are contracted or not.
Also you are the one who rambles on about contracts and not breaking them, soft cap this soft cap that.
As for your comment George I have always said Truck needs one more year as he has only been back for one. He was valuable as an assistant. Teague has had enough chances IMO and is a proven dud.
You really don't get it do you? An assistant can asked to be released from their contract it has been happening for years. But a club if they terminate an assistants contract have to pay most of it out. Seriously it isn't that difficult to understand... then again perhaps it is
Regarding the RFC's current assistant coaches from page 48 from Monday's Herald Sun under the heading "DUSTY IS YZE’S PRIORITY" 7th paragraph
"Said Yze on Ratten: "We have a meeting on Mondayto work out who is contracted, but
the majority of our coaches are contracted and good at what they do. We will workout if there are any gaps in our program and he would be someone we would talk to if there are any spaces available""
So hopefully that proves to you that he said what I've posted a couple about the majority of our assistants being contracts
And before you start twisting things. I have never said ALL I have only posted that Yze said the MAJORITY
