Author Topic: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024  (Read 61829 times)

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9972
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #660 on: October 05, 2024, 07:47:49 AM »
Anyone interested in Fiorini?

6 + Fiorini for Rioli?

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3744
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #661 on: October 05, 2024, 09:22:06 AM »
Anyone interested in Fiorini?

6 + Fiorini for Rioli?
Pass, Hardwick would not give anyone who had significant upside

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #662 on: October 05, 2024, 09:55:57 AM »
https://x.com/cleary_mitch?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1842061653635903926%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=

 :shh

It's a genius idea but think Graham would need to be a better player for it not to look as dodgy and North pick 2 would worry the Eagles enough to say nup. Good idea though.
Go Tigers!

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4461
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #663 on: October 05, 2024, 10:05:05 AM »
Anyone interested in Fiorini?

6 + Fiorini for Rioli?
Pass, Hardwick would not give anyone who had significant upside

Also pass. Same type of midfielder we already have. I really wouldn’t be trading in any mids. We already have TT, Hopper and Prestia as experienced mids. We’re gonna draft atleast 2 top end mids, need to ensure they are actually getting time in the middle and don’t end up like Sonsie shafted into the fwd line.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8093
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #664 on: October 05, 2024, 11:26:09 AM »
https://x.com/cleary_mitch?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1842061653635903926%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=

 :shh

It's a genius idea but think Graham would need to be a better player for it not to look as dodgy and North pick 2 would worry the Eagles enough to say nup. Good idea though.

We’ve matched 4 years so there’s some evidence
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #665 on: October 05, 2024, 12:37:25 PM »
You also have to place trust in the corruption known as the afl. Without knowing the exact formula they may say it didn't quite reach the band 1  :shh
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #666 on: October 05, 2024, 01:08:26 PM »
Geez all of these 1st round compo picks being handed out. Throw in the inevitable bids that will come and our second rounder could be pick 30.

It also greatly affects the picks we are hoping to trade for.
If it continues like this it could get to the point where we have to hang onto Rioli and Bolton.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #667 on: October 05, 2024, 02:14:13 PM »
Original draft hand: 1, 21, 29, 39, 41, 47, 57, 66, 73.

Projected after compos & bids:: 2, 27, 35, 45, 47, 53, 63, 72, 78.

 :damnpc
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98225
    • One-Eyed Richmond

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #669 on: October 05, 2024, 03:04:27 PM »
Sounds like BS from a Port supporter , no value for us or WC ,

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14048
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #670 on: October 05, 2024, 03:40:25 PM »
If port do any deal like that they are more stupid than I thought.

Blues must have hired dudoro in the offseason if they think a pick in the late teens is enough.

If I were port I would be demanding 2 first rounds and that's that.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online OneEyedRichmond

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #671 on: October 05, 2024, 05:54:51 PM »
Original draft hand: 1, 21, 29, 39, 41, 47, 57, 66, 73.

Projected after compos & bids:: 2, 27, 35, 45, 47, 53, 63, 72, 78.

 :damnpc

Your projected is all wrong …  matched bids means later picks are used up 😉 :shh

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #672 on: October 05, 2024, 06:02:19 PM »
It also doesn't include trades ....hence why it's just "projected" based on the current order champ... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online OneEyedRichmond

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #673 on: October 05, 2024, 06:54:40 PM »
It also doesn't include trades ....hence why it's just "projected" based on the current order champ... :shh

I never mentioned trades champ 🤣.

It’s ok to admit you don’t understand how the bidding system works and how it effects later picks  :shh

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #674 on: October 05, 2024, 10:47:29 PM »
I know picks blowout based off f/s and academy but FA compo are the only picks that really effect us. I mean we are not draft Ashcroft, Kako or Lombard. So our first round picks still have relevance to their order. As in we still have Pick 1 it just doesn't include Ashcroft who is never in our calcs. Lombard can go at Pick 8, and our potential Pick 9 goes to 10. We still have the same field to pick from it's just that Lombard went before our pick.

Just need FA round 1 picks to stop thanks.
Go Tigers!