Of course high draft picks are essential and we need them badly.
But the narrative is we need pick 1 and if we had finished with pick 2 then it would have been a failure and imo that’s just not true at all.
I dont agree with all the talk along the lines of oh well this year pick one may as well be pick 5. it is a nonsense.
If im wrong and the MEDIA LOL are right then if we as a club are not trying to split pick one into say pick 4 and 8 then we are not doing due diligence. This to me is the only advantage pick one gives us. I think it is splitable.
There are two kids there id like to get my hands on before anyone gets a look at em.
A couple of simple sliding door moments.
1/ We manage to split #1 for 4 and 8 as an example. Me i want Smillie im happy to keep #1. But for the sliding door moment 4 and 8 it is. we may even need to add something.
We trade Dan Rioli to Dumwit for picks 6 and 20.
We trade Baker plus pick 33 to Freo for 12 and 25.
We get compo for Graham lets say pick 40.
We then bundle up 39, 51, 57, and 64 or some variation of this for a top 20 pick to a club who needs those picks.
It would leave the following picks.
4, 6, 8, 12, 19, 20, 21, 40,41, 72.
Not as mad as it seems imo. If its a real deep draft we could then look at the last 4 picks for future picks and strengthen our draft hand for the following season.