Author Topic: Shane Edwards [merged]  (Read 306666 times)

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #705 on: September 24, 2012, 04:52:48 PM »
surprised edwards didn't go top ten in his draft, how this superstar slipped would make a good book

or 50 page thread
:lol

He slipped to 26. All clubs are guilty of passing on him. :help

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #706 on: September 24, 2012, 04:59:12 PM »
2.15 clangers a game this year WAT

got no idea if that is good or bad
13th at the club. 12 blokes averaged more per game.
Epic fail by titch

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4846
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #707 on: September 24, 2012, 05:05:45 PM »
2.15 clangers a game this year WAT

got no idea if that is good or bad
13th at the club. 12 blokes averaged more per game.
Epic fail by titch

Only 13th?? WAT had him top 4 easily, cant believe he slipped that far back :huh

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #708 on: September 24, 2012, 05:11:31 PM »
if you disregard grahams 1 game, the red pontiac managed a pass mark with a top 4 finish though
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #709 on: September 24, 2012, 06:15:18 PM »
2.15 clangers a game this year WAT

got no idea if that is good or bad
13th at the club. 12 blokes averaged more per game.
Epic fail by titch

Titch is WAT's bitch  :lol
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #710 on: September 24, 2012, 08:46:17 PM »
Titch played 20 games this year averaging just under 18 disposals per game and kicked 29 goals for the season. He had 20 or more possies in 7 matches (3 of them against the top 4 sides) and kicked multiple goals in 10 games.

Career Stats:
        Games  Disposals  Marks  Tackles    G.B        1st   Clear.   In50   R50    CP    UP    1%ers
2007:    16         10.3       3.4       2.2     11.7
2008:    16         11.6       2.9       1.9     12.11
2009:    15         12.6       2.3       2.0       5.3   
2010:    22         18.8       2.8       3.5       7.8
2011:    20         16.1       3.3       2.9       4.12       1.6    1.8      2.6     0.9                         3.4
2012:    20         17.8       2.5       2.8     29.26                2.6      2.7     0.2     8.6    8.7      1.5     

http://finalsiren.com/PlayerStats.asp?PlayerID=1728&SeasonID=ALL
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/player_profile?pid=2007109

So really the only difference was goals, I would like to see his clangers compared...

Jako's got everyone in the team covered in clangers have you checked that out on your video analysis WAT.

Um sorry was that my question, yep sure have noticed it, same as I have noticed the poor kicking of Ellis, the non leading of Jack or the slowness of Post......anymore. The question was about Edwards though...

Strueth your analysis misses nothing.....freaky

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #711 on: September 24, 2012, 09:01:18 PM »
2.15 clangers a game this year WAT

got no idea if that is good or bad
13th at the club. 12 blokes averaged more per game.
Epic fail by titch

Only 13th?? WAT had him top 4 easily, cant believe he slipped that far back :huh

He's got 100 vhs's and watches them on his lunch break. Can't be right.

Offline hammo1976

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #712 on: September 25, 2012, 09:47:25 AM »
EDWARDS was a find this year specially with king struggling and nahas form bit like a yo-yo he kicked goals and dished some off he is slippery. Just hope he hits the gym this year and gets some size on him surely the weights should be working after about 5 pre- seasons know.

GO U TIGERS

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #713 on: September 25, 2012, 10:12:16 AM »
2.15 clangers a game this year WAT

got no idea if that is good or bad

Not that bad I suupose, thought there would of been more actually, maybe he just did them all in the games I watched... ;D
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #714 on: September 25, 2012, 12:28:45 PM »
wonder if his card will be thrown on the table
come trade time.

mmm crows might be interested.

Offline unplugged

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #715 on: September 25, 2012, 12:31:50 PM »
Missing goals from 2m out probably don't count as clangers.  Kicking the ball constantly to the oppositions advantage doesn't count either.  He just puts the ball on his boot and hopes.  He would need 40 possessions a game to make an impact. 

Avoiding any form of physical contact doesn't come up as a stat either.  But he is the master of it.

This thread is good value.

2.15 clangers a game this year WAT

got no idea if that is good or bad

Not that bad I suupose, thought there would of been more actually, maybe he just did them all in the games I watched... ;D

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #716 on: September 25, 2012, 01:12:14 PM »
This thread is good value.

have to agree with this

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #717 on: September 25, 2012, 01:29:02 PM »
Missing goals from 2m out probably don't count as clangers.  Kicking the ball constantly to the oppositions advantage doesn't count either.  He just puts the ball on his boot and hopes.  He would need 40 possessions a game to make an impact. 

Avoiding any form of physical contact doesn't come up as a stat either.  But he is the master of it.

This thread is good value.

2.15 clangers a game this year WAT

got no idea if that is good or bad

Not that bad I suupose, thought there would of been more actually, maybe he just did them all in the games I watched... ;D

 :thumbsup Geez mate we are out numbered here aren't we... :lol
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #718 on: September 25, 2012, 01:42:28 PM »

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Shane Edwards [merged]
« Reply #719 on: September 25, 2012, 01:49:00 PM »
This thread is good value.

have to agree with this

Grow up....




Kidding. Keep up the good work. :lol