Shane Edwards [merged]

[the claw]

I thought he was very very good.

he barely touched the ball for three quarters. was invisible for huge parts of the game as is his norm.
yeah he did some nice things in tight and won his share of c/p which he always does. if not for his last quarter his game was very ordinary.

[Hellenic Tiger]

I'm one of Titch's most critical observers on here but I thought he was much better than ok last night his handball to Grigg for our sixth goal was sublime and he had many other score involvements and clearance work. Consistency is the key with him. Good and bad with Shane are way way too far apart still. Here's hoping the gap closes more.

[Francois Jackson]

Great game

He owes us many more like that to bridge the gap

Edwards has been playing like this week in week out for the past 50+ games

last 50? so last 2 seasons and a bit week in week out he has performed like that you think?

Each to their own i guess. He has played many more poor ones out of his 150.

We are all on the same team here if he helps win us a flag who cares about past performances.

[TigerMonk]

Now if anyone on here bashes this bloke up it's your truely    Well Edwards game last night was one of his better games where he was always about to pull off some rubbish that they keep him around the club for. Last night l gave him a 7   

[🏅Dooks]

I thought he was very very good.

he barely touched the ball for three quarters. was invisible for huge parts of the game as is his norm.
yeah he did some nice things in tight and won his share of c/p which he always does. if not for his last quarter his game was very ordinary.

Not again WAT!

If he barely touched the ball for the first three quarters, how did he have 11 possessions in the first half (our 4th highest) and finish with 22 for the game?

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

Possies:

Hunt    14
Lids     13
Macca   13
Titch    11
Floss    10
Jack     10
Miles     10
Rance    9
Houli      9
Chaplin   9
Lloyd      8
Ellis        8
Grigg     7
Batch    7
Dusty    6
Ivan       6
Griffs     6
Cotch    6
Newy     5
Grimes   5
Morris    3
Gordon  0 (sub not used yet)

[Zlatan]

would be a far lesser side without him

[WA Tiger]

I thought he was very very good.

he barely touched the ball for three quarters. was invisible for huge parts of the game as is his norm.
yeah he did some nice things in tight and won his share of c/p which he always does. if not for his last quarter his game was very ordinary.

Not again WAT!

If he barely touched the ball for the first three quarters, how did he have 11 possessions in the first half (our 4th highest) and finish with 22 for the game?

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

Possies:

Hunt    14
Lids     13
Macca   13
Titch    11
Floss    10
Jack     10
Miles     10
Rance    9
Houli      9
Chaplin   9
Lloyd      8
Ellis        8
Grigg     7
Batch    7
Dusty    6
Ivan       6
Griffs     6
Cotch    6
Newy     5
Grimes   5
Morris    3
Gordon  0 (sub not used yet)

WTF, wake up Dooks, I will re-post what I said and then wait for your apology!!!! Some of you posters...

[WA Tiger]

Edwards for mine, well he was excellent one of the BOG without doubt,. He was the only player that cleared the ball out of the center for us consistently, 6 times in fact. His handballs were great and really got us going!!! Excellent game Shane, keep that going mate!!

For you Dooks, you ******* **** !!!!!

[🏅Dooks]

Edwards for mine, well he was excellent one of the BOG without doubt,. He was the only player that cleared the ball out of the center for us consistently, 6 times in fact. His handballs were great and really got us going!!! Excellent game Shane, keep that going mate!!

For you Dooks, you ******* **** !!!!!

Oops sorry Wat. I meant claw. Ok I'll repost below....

[🏅Dooks]

I thought he was very very good.

he barely touched the ball for three quarters. was invisible for huge parts of the game as is his norm.
yeah he did some nice things in tight and won his share of c/p which he always does. if not for his last quarter his game was very ordinary.

Claw!

If he barely touched the ball for the first three quarters, how did he have 11 possessions in the first half (our 4th highest) and finish with 22 for the game?

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

Possies:

Hunt    14
Lids     13
Macca   13
Titch    11
Floss    10
Jack     10
Miles     10
Rance    9
Houli      9
Chaplin   9
Lloyd      8
Ellis        8
Grigg     7
Batch    7
Dusty    6
Ivan       6
Griffs     6
Cotch    6
Newy     5
Grimes   5
Morris    3
Gordon  0 (sub not used yet)

[WA Tiger]

Edwards for mine, well he was excellent one of the BOG without doubt,. He was the only player that cleared the ball out of the center for us consistently, 6 times in fact. His handballs were great and really got us going!!! Excellent game Shane, keep that going mate!!

For you Dooks, you ******* **** !!!!!

Oops sorry Wat. I meant claw. Ok I'll repost below....

Ok, no worries.

[torch]

Does a lot of little things very well.

Death touches.

Handballs.

Side steps.

Assists.

Smothers.

Pressure acts.

Blocks.

Mr Elite 

[the claw]

I thought he was very very good.

he barely touched the ball for three quarters. was invisible for huge parts of the game as is his norm.
yeah he did some nice things in tight and won his share of c/p which he always does. if not for his last quarter his game was very ordinary.

Not again WAT!

If he barely touched the ball for the first three quarters, how did he have 11 possessions in the first half (our 4th highest) and finish with 22 for the game?

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

Possies:

Hunt    14
Lids     13
Macca   13
Titch    11
Floss    10
Jack     10
Miles     10
Rance    9
Houli      9
Chaplin   9
Lloyd      8
Ellis        8
Grigg     7
Batch    7
Dusty    6
Ivan       6
Griffs     6
Cotch    6
Newy     5
Grimes   5
Morris    3
Gordon  0 (sub not used yet)

simple he didnt.
since otherds are bringing up stats i looked up his  quarters break down they went as thus
q1 -  2 kicks 0 h/b
q2 -  3kicks 1hb
q3  - 0 kicks 2 hb
thats 8 dispoasols and 0 tackles. its worse than i thought.
q4 -  4 kicks 9h/b 3 tackles.

they confirm what i thought, that he was invisible for big chunks of the game.
totals 9 kicks 12 h/b 3 tackles.

[🏅Dooks]

Where's a link to your stats?

I'll trust One -Eyes over yours

[the claw]

Where's a link to your stats?

I'll trust One -Eyes over yours

nine msm live score updates. one of the few sites i can find who do a quarter by quarter break down.
would appreciate if you or anyone else could provide a lnk to other sites that do it.

also if proved correct all apologies will be accepted  .

one continual complaint i have with edwards is he just doesnt consistently get his hands on the ball enough. to me for an average mid 20 a game is the cut off as good as people make him out t be last yr he went at 17 .6 a game. it highlights the fact he does go missing throughout games too much.

as i said i thought he did some nice things but i also thought his game very inconsistent. and for three quarters he just didnt get his hands on the pill enough for me. 26yo 150 game mids just have to be better.