Those that talk the most think they are always right...actually they are just reptititive.
WHO is the messiah that will take on the Richmond job? Especially with the knowledge that there are numerous people waiting in the wings to bitch and moan and stab them in the back the instant they make a mistake. Bitterness smothers almost everything written on this board sometimes.
I agree that some posts show bitterness, however, just because Richmond had a history of sacking coaches in the 80's willy nilly doesn't mean that todays coaches shouldn't be exempt from criticism.
I mean heck Spud got 5 years, probably 2 more than he deserved because the administration pleaded with the supporters to leave coaches alone to do their job, we did that, (well until a certain Adelaide game anyway) and look where it got us. Add to that the fact that Wallace is on around $600,000 per year, which is around about twice as much as the Prime Minister gets, so there is no reason that he should not be under the same scrunity as Johnny Howard, Kevin Rudd or Steve Bracks.
I'd like to see critiques of Wallace that are more well rounded, less repetitive, and based on fact. Which would include divulging information on this forum, which some people are loathe to do.