Author Topic: 2011 Draft thread [merged]  (Read 42811 times)

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #45 on: October 02, 2011, 06:26:09 PM »
76kg's at 189 cm, light but looks like plenty of room to pack on some beef, tracking nicely for mid to upper 80kg mark with a few pre seasons in the gym, could be a nice pickup if he has the skills.

Has the skills supposively. Has huge legs so would imagine he will fill out in the upper body quite nicely. A quick goal-kicking mid. Pretty sure we need one of them.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #46 on: October 02, 2011, 06:30:45 PM »
I would imagine he has a cm or two of height to go too given his age. 
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline tigtuff12

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #47 on: October 02, 2011, 08:21:17 PM »
76kg's at 189 cm, light but looks like plenty of room to pack on some beef, tracking nicely for mid to upper 80kg mark with a few pre seasons in the gym, could be a nice pickup if he has the skills.

Has the skills supposively. Has huge legs so would imagine he will fill out in the upper body quite nicely. A quick goal-kicking mid. Pretty sure we need one of them.
I would imagine he has a cm or two of height to go too given his age. 

^ sounds like he could fill out & mature nicely - skills def don't seem to be his biggest concern from all reports - and yes, we could def do with some more goal kicking mids :)
...the fighting fury...

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98244
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #48 on: October 03, 2011, 01:17:38 PM »
From two of the regular BF phantom draft makers (Knightmare and Bulldogsman):

#24 Daniel Markworth (VIC – Mid/Fwd)
Height: 189cm, Weight: 78kg, DOB: 03/04/1992
Recruited from: Calder Cannons
Player comparison: Nat Fyfe
Range: 10-35
Profile: Overager with nice positional flexibility. High character. Comes from a tennis and basketball background. Has played as leadup forward as well as a midfielder and brings really nice versatility. Very high athlete with a super burst of pace. Not bad by foot and has a good 55m kick on him. Good ball user by both hand and foot. New to AFL but showing some big progress! Looks very draftable. Still learning the game. Project. But has made big progress! Just keeps getting better with every game he plays and there seems to be allot of upside.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=843582

PICK 20 – Daniel Markworth (Calder Cannons)
Height: 189cm Weight: 76kg Age: 19
Medium forward/Midfielder

Lead up forward that has shown some ability to play through the midfield. Only fairly new to the game but has shown a lot this year. Was ranked no 1 for goal assists and no 4 on the goal kicking ladder in the TAC cup. Has very good pace and very clean hands. He can take a contested grab. He’s a good kick and can be quite creative. Decision making is generally ok and will only improve. Still has plenty of upside and is still learning the game. I can see him developing as a midfielder eventually with his break away pace being his weapon.

Can’t see this guy slipping past... middle of the 2nd round

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=876935

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #49 on: October 03, 2011, 01:33:58 PM »
Why would we go with a project player with our first round pick who'll need 3 years to stack on the 12-14 kgs needed to play at AFL level?!  ??? Surely you go with the best available footballer with your first pick such as a Grigg based on that TAC Cup Future Stars phantom draft.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #50 on: October 03, 2011, 01:46:56 PM »
Why would we go with a project player with our first round pick who'll need 3 years to stack on the 12-14 kgs needed to play at AFL level?!  ??? Surely you go with the best available footballer with your first pick such as a Grigg based on that TAC Cup Future Stars phantom draft.

absolutely MT - dont take risks with first couple of picks

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #51 on: October 03, 2011, 01:54:36 PM »
agree shouldn't be taking risks with our first pick but his weight is a non issue
conca, batch and helbig were all around the 76-78kg mark
this markworth bloke is almost identical size to batch

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #52 on: October 03, 2011, 02:43:33 PM »
Batch was 188cm, 82kg when drafted (a differential of 6 == height/10 - weight)
Reece was 185cm, 79kg (also a differential of 6)
Helbig was 185cm, 75kg (differential of 10 but he was a 3rd round pick - pick 47)

You don't risk first round picks on kids who need to put on 12-14kgs unless they are rucks/tall KPPs who are high 190s/200+cm tall.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #53 on: October 03, 2011, 02:45:30 PM »
agree shouldn't be taking risks with our first pick but his weight is a non issue
conca, batch and helbig were all around the 76-78kg mark
this markworth bloke is almost identical size to batch

spot on. people see project and think its a worry. The first PD one-eyed put up rates Markworth the 8th best player long term. That's what we want. Could take the best current player and end up with the 30th best in 3 years or the 30th best now who ends up being top 5 in 3 years. I know which one i'd take. 76-78kg isn't bad at all. 70kg would be a worry.

I'd take Nat Fyfe in a heartbeat.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #54 on: October 03, 2011, 02:46:07 PM »
Batch was 188cm, 82kg when drafted (a differential of 6 == height/10 - weight)
Reece was 185cm, 79kg (also a differential of 6)
Helbig was 185cm, 75kg (differential of 10 but he was a 3rd round pick - pick 47)

You don't risk first round picks on kids who need to put on 12-14kgs unless they are rucks/tall KPPs who are high 190s/200+cm tall.

The kid is an outside mid with elite skill and pace. We won't necessarily take him but he's hardly a risk.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #55 on: October 03, 2011, 02:47:56 PM »
batchy is still listed at 188 78 on the RFC site, and there are differing reports (like with all draftees) on markworth's weight

nope, markworth's weight is not the issue at all, he'd be into the 80 range before R1

the issue is he's a project, end of story

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #56 on: October 03, 2011, 02:53:34 PM »
and that height weight differential formula is a nothing more than antiquated layman's guide

has nothing to do with capabilities, long and short term, of playing at AFL level, debunked long ago

my concern with markworth is his lack of time in the game

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #57 on: October 03, 2011, 03:05:36 PM »
nope, markworth's weight is not the issue at all, he'd be into the 80 range before R1

the issue is he's a project, end of story

spot on

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #58 on: October 03, 2011, 03:26:02 PM »
OER the foundation for Richmond supporters to scream "Dud" on draft day  :lol

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2011 Draft thread
« Reply #59 on: October 03, 2011, 05:31:18 PM »
I would be surprised if Batch weighed only 78kgs seeing him and the way he plays but in any case he wasn't a first round pick so he's not a contrary example. IMO you don't use first round picks on mids who will need to put on 12 kgs especially when there will be safer alternatives who are real footballers available at pick 14 who don't need to learn to the basics of the game. Our recruiters in this year's draft will earn their money with our 2nd, 3rd and 4th round picks moreso than our first rounder.

OER the foundation for Richmond supporters to scream "Dud" on draft day  :lol
:lol

We've been pretty good lately. I don't think we've done that with our first pick since JON in 2005.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd