Author Topic: Science thread [merged]  (Read 98111 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #90 on: February 16, 2014, 11:32:27 PM »
I know it's not literally something from nothing but it was more a dig at 'those' who can't get their head around ending with seemingly more than they started with.
All good  :thumbsup

Honestly I'm surprised and excited by this. Not being a physics pro I just assumed this was only capable in the cores of stars due to their mass overcoming the strong interaction (or was it the weak? I always get the two mixed up lol) and that the technology just did not exist yet. Makes taking my scifi books literally a little easier ;D
The mass (gravitational force) has to be massive enough to overcome the electric repulsion of like (positive) charge protons and 'squeeze' the protons close enough together to fuse. So the Sun produces and releases energy by fusing Hydrogen into Helium.


http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit2/energy.html

Or pictorially:

http://www.physics.fsu.edu/users/ProsperH/astronomy/sun/default.htm
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #91 on: February 16, 2014, 11:50:08 PM »
All the way into iron until it is no more efficient to fuse into heavier elements  :thumbsup

Sagan's greatest ever quote, "we are made of star stuff." If you have Fox the Cosmos series is being rebooted by Ann Druyan and Steve Sotor from the original as well as Seth McFarlane, and presented by Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Airs in Aus on NatGeo March 26th I think it is.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #92 on: February 21, 2014, 12:49:26 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oAVjF_7ensg

just be sheer weight of numbers, the chances that we are the only planet supporting life is minimal
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #93 on: February 22, 2014, 11:23:33 PM »
All the way into iron until it is no more efficient to fuse into heavier elements  :thumbsup

Sagan's greatest ever quote, "we are made of star stuff." If you have Fox the Cosmos series is being rebooted by Ann Druyan and Steve Sotor from the original as well as Seth McFarlane, and presented by Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Airs in Aus on NatGeo March 26th I think it is.

I was interested until you said Seth McFarlane. Unless of courses the series attempts to unravel the cosmic mystery of how one twit can become so successful recycling the same unfunny joke over and over again.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #94 on: February 22, 2014, 11:27:20 PM »
Whether or not you find him funny is subjective, but without his input the new series wouldn't have received any network backing. He's a staunch atheist and has been trying to get this off the ground for years.


Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #96 on: March 13, 2014, 12:13:29 PM »
Quantum physics secures new cryptography scheme.

The way we secure digital transactions could soon change. An international team has demonstrated a form of quantum cryptography that can protect people doing business with others they may not know or trust – a situation encountered often on the internet and in everyday life, for example at a bank's ATM.

"Having quantum cryptography to hand is a realistic prospect, I think. I expect that quantum technologies will gradually become integrated with existing devices such as smartphones, allowing us to do things like identify ourselves securely or generate encryption keys," says Stephanie Wehner, a Principal Investigator at the Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT) at the National University of Singapore, and co-author on the paper.

In cryptography, the problem of providing a secure way for two mutually distrustful parties to interact is known as 'two-party secure computation'. The new work, published in Nature Communications, describes the implementation using quantum technology of an important building block for such schemes.

Today, taking money out of an ATM requires that you put in a card and type in your PIN. You trust the bank's machine with your personal data. But what if you don't trust the machine? You might instead type your PIN into your trusted phone, then let your phone do secure quantum identification with the ATM (see artist's impression). Ultimately, the aim is to implement a scheme that can check if your account number and PIN matches the bank's records without either you or the bank having to disclose the login details to each other.

The experiments performed at IQC deployed quantum-entangled photons in such a way that one party, dubbed Alice, could share information with a second party, dubbed Bob, while meeting stringent restrictions. Specifically, Alice has two sets of information. Bob requests access to one or the other, and Alice must be able to send it to him without knowing which set he's asked for. Bob must also learn nothing about the unrequested set. This is a protocol known as 1-2 random oblivious transfer (ROT).

Unlike protocols for ROT that use only classical physics, the security of the quantum protocol cannot be broken by computational power. Even if the attacker had a quantum computer, the protocol would remain secure.

To start the ROT protocol, Alice creates pairs of entangled photons. She measures one of each pair and sends the other to Bob to measure. Bob chooses which photons he wants to learn about, dividing his data accordingly without revealing his picks to Alice. Both then wait for a length of time chosen such that any attempt to store quantum information about the photons is likely to fail. To complete the oblivious transfer, Alice then tells Bob which measurements she made, and they both process their data in set ways that ensure the result is correct and secure within a pre-agreed margin of error.

In the demonstration performed at IQC, Alice and Bob achieved a random oblivious transfer of 1,366 bits. The whole process took about three minutes.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-03-quantum-physics-cryptography-scheme.html

Actual scientific paper at: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140312/ncomms4418/full/ncomms4418.html
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #97 on: March 13, 2014, 12:53:40 PM »
That's awesome if it could be applied to internet transactions  in time as well.

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #98 on: March 17, 2014, 03:00:28 PM »
Here is an interesting documentary called "A Brief History Of Time" on Stephen Hawking's life and his theories.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjFynyihXuY

Suffice to say that after watching this very good doco, I came to the conclusion that Stephen was in fact the most normal person in his family. His sister is well scary and I mean "The hills have eyes" scary.  :outtahere


dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #99 on: March 17, 2014, 08:10:38 PM »

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #100 on: March 17, 2014, 11:07:26 PM »
Dam


Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #102 on: March 18, 2014, 10:17:50 AM »
So is this a cosmologists version of one of those magic eye things? If you stare at it long enough you may be able to draw some sort of theoretical conclusion from it?

I wonder what they would see if they squint.  ;D

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Science thread [merged]
« Reply #103 on: March 18, 2014, 10:24:03 AM »
Inflation is no longer theoretical. It would take some remarkable evidence to suggest otherwise.  :cheers

Anyone catch the new Cosmos reboot on NatGeo? I reckon Neil Tyson is a very fitting replacement for Carl Sagan.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir