Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Will stand corrected but wasn't the dislocation and the subsequent serious ligament damage last year to his good knee?And sorry and I'm no medical expert but I don't understand how dislocating a kneecap is a result of being injury prone, it was freak injury. I know he had injury probs in Adelaide but weren't they predominantly soft tissue? This knee injury was not a soft tissue injury
He'll be our best pick up ever
Quote from: WilliamPowell on August 17, 2014, 09:39:53 PMWill stand corrected but wasn't the dislocation and the subsequent serious ligament damage last year to his good knee?And sorry and I'm no medical expert but I don't understand how dislocating a kneecap is a result of being injury prone, it was freak injury. I know he had injury probs in Adelaide but weren't they predominantly soft tissue? This knee injury was not a soft tissue injuryI thought he'd had injuries on both legs? Could argue it doesn't matter what knee because the fact is he has injured both now.If I remember correctly his dislocation was a result of ligament/tendon tear (depends what was actually damaged as I can't remember). This means it was a soft tissue injury as soft tissue refers to tendon, ligaments, muscles, synovial membranes etc. Pretty much anything that isn't bone. Not sure where this notion of a patella dislocation not being a soft tissue injury has come from as I've heard it a couple of times. In all seriousness I would like to hear what YBB has to say about it because generally his opinion is one I take on board.
Quote from: Yeahright on August 19, 2014, 08:09:46 PMQuote from: WilliamPowell on August 17, 2014, 09:39:53 PMWill stand corrected but wasn't the dislocation and the subsequent serious ligament damage last year to his good knee?And sorry and I'm no medical expert but I don't understand how dislocating a kneecap is a result of being injury prone, it was freak injury. I know he had injury probs in Adelaide but weren't they predominantly soft tissue? This knee injury was not a soft tissue injuryI thought he'd had injuries on both legs? Could argue it doesn't matter what knee because the fact is he has injured both now.If I remember correctly his dislocation was a result of ligament/tendon tear (depends what was actually damaged as I can't remember). This means it was a soft tissue injury as soft tissue refers to tendon, ligaments, muscles, synovial membranes etc. Pretty much anything that isn't bone. Not sure where this notion of a patella dislocation not being a soft tissue injury has come from as I've heard it a couple of times. In all seriousness I would like to hear what YBB has to say about it because generally his opinion is one I take on board.Agree I'd like to hear YBB opinion on this as well. Also that's where we differ in what we've heard. I heard at a pre-match function last year after he dislocated his knee that the dislocation had caused major ligament & tendon damage (similar to Astbury's a few years back). Hence, my comment about this knee injury not being soft tissue. As I said will stand corrected only going by what I was told last year
Any injury, freak or otherwise, contributes to someone being 'injury prone'.
Regardless if it was soft tissue, hard tissue, pliable tissue or kleenex tissue, it's about time he be given his favourite meal and taken down to the back paddock.
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH
Secret weapon.
Quote from: Tigeritis™©® on February 28, 2015, 11:03:32 PMSecret weapon.