Author Topic: How did we rate Richmond's draft?  (Read 7914 times)

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #45 on: November 23, 2012, 02:09:09 PM »
Out of the 4 we know Vlastuin will play but out of the other 3 who will get a gig next year?
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #46 on: November 23, 2012, 02:10:19 PM »
Out of the 4 we know Vlastuin will play but out of the other 3 who will get a gig next year?

McIntosh.

Maybe McDonough depending on his fitness levels.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #47 on: November 23, 2012, 02:11:26 PM »
Out of the 4 we know Vlastuin will play but out of the other 3 who will get a gig next year?

McIntosh.

Maybe McDonough depending on his fitness levels.

Mcintosh won't play unless someone goes down?

Mcbean no chance at all?
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #48 on: November 23, 2012, 02:30:05 PM »
Out of the 4 we know Vlastuin will play but out of the other 3 who will get a gig next year?

McIntosh.

Maybe McDonough depending on his fitness levels.

Mcintosh won't play unless someone goes down?

Mcbean no chance at all?

Surely 1 midfielder will go down or Ellis will get tired on a wing. Batch always gets injured at least once. Plenty of chances for McIntosh.

Not sure on McBean. Elton got a game so he may get 1 or 2 if we are desperate.

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #49 on: November 23, 2012, 02:45:54 PM »
All bar McBean should get a game.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #50 on: November 23, 2012, 02:51:37 PM »
All bar McBean should get a game.

Don't hate on Beaner

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #51 on: November 23, 2012, 03:00:48 PM »
Very pleased with the selection of Beaner (I got him in the OER Phantom Draft, so I'm an expert  :police: ), just won't be physically ready for AFL next season.  8)

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #52 on: November 23, 2012, 03:20:46 PM »
Really hoping none of them get a game until after mid year. This will mean they have 1) earned their spot,  2) we have few injuries and 3) their are many more big bodied, senior players in front of them.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #53 on: November 23, 2012, 03:24:11 PM »
Why can't they earn their spot prior to round one instead of blokes like Newman getting a game on reputation?

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #54 on: November 23, 2012, 03:51:55 PM »
Very pleased with the selection of Beaner (I got him in the OER Phantom Draft, so I'm an expert  :police: ), just won't be physically ready for AFL next season.  8)

David Bourke mk II ?
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #55 on: November 23, 2012, 03:58:27 PM »
Why can't they earn their spot prior to round one instead of blokes like Newman getting a game on reputation?

 :clapping

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4842
  • Beaver BLT
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #56 on: November 23, 2012, 06:00:24 PM »
Very pleased with the selection of Beaner (I got him in the OER Phantom Draft, so I'm an expert  :police: ), just won't be physically ready for AFL next season.  8)

David Bourke mk II ?

Was Bourke a ruckman :wallywink :wallywink

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #57 on: November 23, 2012, 06:27:44 PM »
Very pleased with the selection of Beaner (I got him in the OER Phantom Draft, so I'm an expert  :police: ), just won't be physically ready for AFL next season.  8)

David Bourke mk II ?

Was Bourke a ruckman :wallywink :wallywink

He sure was skinny though
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #58 on: November 23, 2012, 11:28:51 PM »
All bar McBean should get a game.

x 2

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's draft?
« Reply #59 on: November 24, 2012, 09:30:30 AM »
I expect Vlastuin and McIntosh to become really good players for us. McBean is 2 to 3 years away. McDonut well thats up to him if he works hard anythings possible I suppose.