You just proved yourself to be the idiot I think you are. I didn't compare the two players. Go back and have a look and if you are any sort of a man you'll say you are an idiot and we can all move on with the conformation from the idiot that you are indeed an idiot. Congratulations
Congrats and deserved short is next to jack as far as footy smarts go.....and his kicking
Is he as good as puopolo?
You are all dreaming if you think he is any good
Jayden Short. Paul Puopolo
20yo 16 games 23yo 133 games
Height 177. 72kg. Height 173. 78kg
Averages. Averages
Disposals 14.88 Disposals 14.71
Kicks 11.81 Kicks 7.41
Marks 3.38. Marks 2.41
Handballs 3.06 Handballs 7.81
Goals 0.38 Goals 0.98
If it's Puopolo we're comparing with he's tracking along quite nicely....
http://afltables.com/afl/stats/players/J/Jayden_Short.html
http://afltables.com/afl/stats/players/P/Paul_Puopolo.html
There is a stat you missed- 3x Premiership player. Makes all the other numbers sound pretty stupid.
There is your comparison right there you nuffer. So are you now man enough to admit you're in fact the idiot?
Just so it is clear to everyone my interpretation is as follows;
* Big Note didn't put up the initial comparison
* Big Note however did add to the initial comparison by adding another comparison factor ie premierships
* Big Note then went on to say because Puopolo was a premiership player x 3 that the other comparison factors where all stupid
To summarise Big Note has inferred by his posts that comparing Short and Puopolo is valid and the most material factor is premierships played.
If anyone else has a different interpretation of what has happened please advise.