Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 24422 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 70438
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #405 on: January 06, 2020, 01:34:56 AM »
Quote from: Mark Alvey @alvey5
Cotchin would have found it hard if he was suspended for the 17 GF like he should have been, absolute Rort

Quote from: Rhubarb90386160
Send Cotchin to the Suns and see how good a leader he is then 😂

Quote from: Mitchell Kermath @mitchykerm
Easy for Cotchin when they gave him a Brownlow he didn’t deserve and then let him play in a grand final he should’ve been suspended for
https://twitter.com/rickynixontoot/status/1213003799696048128

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 70438
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #406 on: January 09, 2020, 03:34:29 AM »
From the Herald-Sun's readers comments:


Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3165
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #407 on: January 09, 2020, 11:38:42 AM »
From the Herald-Sun's readers comments:



No, and at the moment we have the right to be arrogant! Winning a flag entitles you to that until the following season :)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 70438
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #408 on: January 13, 2020, 05:03:12 PM »
North Melbourne's Shaun Atley ... said he found it difficult to watch finals football from his couch at home, admitting to feelings of envy watching Richmond players hold up the premiership cup last September.

He said some of his teammates avoided the television set at finals time altogether.

“You definitely get jealous,” he said.

“It can be hard to watch for sure.

“Some of the boys don’t even watch it because they don’t want to get that feeling, but we understand and we know it can turn really quickly.

“But at the same time there’s a lot of work that needs to go in behind that to get to that stage.”

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/north-melbourne/north-melbourne-defender-shaun-atley-says-he-is-hungry-for-a-return-to-september-action-in-2020/news-story/0932d9d61afadbe66d2fce1ce6acae8f

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #409 on: January 15, 2020, 08:50:17 AM »
What a surprise

NORF

lol

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 70438
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #410 on: January 17, 2020, 02:59:34 AM »
Blight on SEN with Dwayne Russell said footy now is too defensive (wingmen pushed back at centre bounces to bolster the defence and tackling momentum to keep the ball in the forward line is causing more stoppages). A coach one day will go all out attack and change things.

ps. Having said that Blight likes Dimma as what Dimma says has always made sense to Blight.

https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode?id=549753

Online Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 799
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #411 on: January 17, 2020, 10:17:45 AM »
Our game is based on defense first but once we have the ball it is get the ball as quickly forward by any means.

Would think our game would stand up against anyone trying all out attack. They would be caught out on rebound.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 70438
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #412 on: January 22, 2020, 04:00:43 PM »
Eddie McGuire responds to claims Collingwood might not be the biggest club in the AFL.

https://www.triplem.com.au/story/eddie-mcguire-responds-to-claims-collingwood-might-not-be-the-biggest-club-in-the-afl-154281

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #413 on: January 22, 2020, 04:17:37 PM »
Ed sounds as though he is ready to concede.

Offline RedanTiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 989
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #414 on: January 22, 2020, 04:51:23 PM »
Poor old Ed.
Really sounds like a politician - setting up false arguments (straw man) that no-one has suggested just so they look silly.
Biggest club from Marvel, Biggest in Western suburbs, most revenue from pokies.

How about highest membership in the whole AFL
How about highest attendance in the AFL
How about highest ratings on AFL telecasts

Thats not a limitation based on venue, home  or non-core revenue.
Thats the best in the WHOLE competition we compete within.

Suck it up Ed.   oh and best of luck with your salary cap and upgrade subsidies.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 49486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #415 on: January 26, 2020, 04:12:03 PM »
Quote from: 00VicWard001
Quote from: Down at K Park
    Arrogance is saying on live tv, maybe dangerfield should have stayed and he'd be a premiership player. One week before the grand final where they were utterly humiliated. I wonder who did that?

    If that's not arrogance then I don't know what is.
You know what, he was right. That's not arrogance. If Danger stayed, the Crows would have beaten Richmond in the 2017 GF. That year, Danger was the dominant brownlow medalist. He was a beast. Add him into that Crows team and they wouldn't have wilted.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/is-josh-jenkins-in-our-best-22.1231369/page-13#post-64111213

 :lol

Funny that given Dusty was the 2017 Brownlow medallist and Danger didn't stop us beating Geelong in the finals of both 2017 & 2019 on our way to premierships :stupid.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd