whhoooo freakin rrraaaaayyyyy. got 7 or 8 yrs when you shouyld have got 2 at best.
your probably a great bloke kingy but ffs you were an ordinary footballer at this level.
A Edwards better?
different type and different need. a edwards a short term fix we all knew that. unlike king who has played 8 mostly very ordinary yrs and should never have been retained for as long as he has. we keep duds for so long we never improve and have little scope for improvement. king has been a part of this problem.
i refuse to sugar coat his carreer just because hes retired.
What are you trying to say that Shane Edwards has done more in his 8 years ?. Kingy done more in 1 year than Shedwards 8 years.
l dont know why you compare A Edwards they are 2 very different footballer's & Aaron is a crap footballer cause he won't give 100%
i didnt compare the two. angus hampson was being a smart arse and raised the comparison.and i replied to his post. do you read peoples posts before jumping in.
as poor as s edwards has been he has been a far better player than king. now that is saying something. simple fact is both are duds i cant be bothered arguing with you who is the bigger one.
you blokes crack me up. moaning on one hand about not being able to regularly play finals, and on the other hand defend the very hacks that stop us getting anywhere.
king while he gives 150% is and always has been a veru mediocre afl footballer. im glad to see the back of him in this sense.
s edwards i would have cut 5 yrs ago i constantly complain about this hack yr after yr. both are duds and we would be better off with out the both of them. we struggle big time in the roles these players perform.